The gender roles within both Rome and Han China were similar. For example, both civilizations were patriarchal. The male was placed in charge because he was the closest to his ancestors, maintained the well-being of the household, and made sure to continue the family’s sense of honor. A difference between Rome and Han China included the family structure. The people of Han China believed that the way an individual acted would reflect upon the whole family and their hierarchy; in contrast, Rome was more lenient on the individual affecting the family’s hierarchy. The reason for the Romans’ lenience was that there was no equivalence of Confucianism in Roman society. Roman hierarchy did not completely rely on an individual’s code and conduct. Although these two civilizations do not relate in their family structure, they are comparative within their method of economical production.
Both Rome and Han China’s civilizations applied the same method of economical production. Agriculture was the main factor within the Roman and Han Chinese economies . During annual harvests both empires received a certain percentage of revenue which funded government activities. The class structures included in the Rome and Han China civilizations were very different from one another. An opportunity for improvement of an individual’s economic and social status was very limited in China; whereas in Rome, it was not so limited. Trade and the lack of interference from the Roman government resulted in more economic mobility within the hierarchy. Additionally, Rome and Han China also compared in their agriculture.
Another similarity that the Roman and Han civilizations shared was architecture. Roads were originally built to assist the journey of the military troops; however, these same roads were later used to spread trade and culture throughout each empire. Rome and Han China had different styles of religious practice. In Han China, Buddhism came to be the leading religion, while in Rome the leading religion was Christianity. Unlike Christianity which maintained its original viewpoints, Buddhism was willing to adapt to the Chinese traditions and beliefs.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Han China chose the middle path between the two diverse methods of government and pursued the policies of administrative centralization and imperial expansion. In contrast, Imperial Rome centralized political and military power which coincided with the preservation of traditional republican offices and form of government. The Han government believed that the network of political alliances in the Zhou Dynasty caused chaos between states, but the tightly woven Qin dynasty diminished the reason for imperial family members the sustain the empire. Han China was preferably divided into administrative districts that were governed by officials. These officials reached the emperor’s expectations, but allowed his authority over them while the bureaucrats implied his policies. Although, original forms of governing were adjusted in both places; the military responded directly to the emperor or ruler to avoid the problems caused by generals commanding personal armies. Imperial Rome progressed, from a previous dictatorship, by fashioning a centralized political government and unifying military power. Imperial Rome, in comparison to Han china, handled governmental functions with more concern. The Roman Emperor accrued copious amounts of power for himself and took complete responsibility during these times.…
- 514 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China and Imperial Rome's government were similar due to the fact that they were ruled under one central leader. Han China had an emperor, who would enforce policies. Imperial Rome had a republic because they felt as though a monarchy did no good to the people. Although, the Senate of Rome had most of the power over the citizens. The differences between their rule was that in Han China the lower class citizens did not have any say on how they were ruled, while in Imperial Rome the plebeians, ordinary people, had representatives in the Senate, tribunes. Another difference between Han China and Imperial Rome is that, in Han China the emperor was chosen through family(hereditary), while in Rome they chose their ruler.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both had a great influence not only on its people but the world as a whole. The two had similar and different methods of political control. Both ruled their people under a bureaucracy, they had civil servants to maintain their large empires, and their foundations were made of great and strong rulers. Aside from the similarities they also had several differences. Take China for example, they focused more on Confucianism and they had a Mandate of Heaven. Rome on the other hand used entertainment to distract and control the masses of its population.…
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
While Han China and Imperial Rome possess distinct differences, for example, the effects of their collapse and their religious views in government, the similarities between the two are still there, like, the cause of their falls and the ways of leadership over their empires. The Romans and the Han, though they appear very different at a glance do have their similarities. Despite being far in distance, the empires were both different and the same throughout their history and in their untimely…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Both empires have to develop road systems for their expanding military. The roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role along with the senate, in choosing an emperor. The center power for the Roman Empire as generally the senate. The ruler for the Han dynasty was hereditary. The Han dynasty’s military wasn’t as loyal. Most of the soldiers were new drafted and didn’t have much experience. The merchant class in Han was restricted by the government unlike the middle class in Rome whom were free from government constraints which allowed economic mobility. The imperial model was only revived in china later but it never revived in Rome.…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare and Contrast the Fall of the Han Dynasty with the Fall of the Roman Empire.…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. - 476 C.E.) were each amazing civilizations in their own ways. Each dynasty made many great ecological and technological advancements. Additionally, the governments of these civilizations each had ways of maintaining the political control over their subjects. The Han Dynasty of China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control were similar in many ways (including their use of centralized governments and their uses of their military) and many differences (including the roles of citizens in the government and the governments techniques for keeping the lower classes happy) but I believe the similarities outweigh the differences because while the differences are definite ways to control the people, the similarities listed have been much more long-lasting and are also much more essential to this type of control.…
- 775 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…
- 624 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty both have many similarities and differences. The Roman Empire lasted from 27 BC - 476 CE. The Han Dynasty lasted from 206 - 220 BCE. The Roman Empire included parts of northern Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. Throughout ancient history, this was known as the largest empire ever. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty included only the southeastern and northeastern parts of present-day China. Even though both Rome and Han were settled in different areas at different times, they were very similar in the way they chose their government officials & their duties and architectural accomplishments, but they had different thoughts on religion. Both civilizations have been shown to have many similarities and differences, whether it was politically, architecturally, or religiously.…
- 695 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Consolidating the Roman and Chinese Empires 1. both empires defined themselves in universal terms 2. both invested heavily in public works 3. both claimed supernatural sanctions a. deceased Roman emperors as gods (imperial cult) i. persecution of Christians for nonparticipation in cult b. Chinese emperor as Son of Heaven i. rule by Mandate of Heaven ii. dependent on just rule iii. heavy ritual duties to maintain relationship between earth and heaven iv. moral government spelled out by writings of Confucius and his followers The Han Dynasty was heir to the Qin state that had unified China in 221 BCE. The first ruler of the Qin established the title of “emperor.” The power of a Chinese emperor was absolute; however, he was subject to various checks on his authority by both high officials and imperial family members. The Romans practiced emperor worship solely in the case of dead emperors. In addition, only certain emperors were accorded divine honors, and always after death. In other parts of the Empire, however, local customs merged with Roman ones. In Egypt, for instance, emperor worship was practiced more widely. This was because the Roman office of emperor combined with the Egyptian notion as Pharaohas-sun-god. Chinese emperors were not considered divine beings. The emperor was called the “Son of Heaven” and was responsible for conducting sacrifices to both Heaven and Earth. The word “Heaven” referred more or less to what we would call “nature”: the succession of day and night, and the motions of the stars and planets. During the first millennium BCE, the concept of the “Mandate of Heaven” was applied. If an emperor oppressed the people, Heaven could withdraw a dynasty’s right to govern.…
- 3046 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
To begin with, decentralization occurred and upper classes’ values in both societies changed. In Han China, landlords ruled their neighborhoods according to their wishes. In Rome, farmers gathered under the protection of landlords. The decentralization occurred because in both societies, the central government was weakening and quality of imperial rule was declining so landlords became the source of power. Another reason was that in Han China, bureaucrats were becoming corrupt. In Rome, the upper class became more pleasure-seeking, and did not participate politically and economically. The upper classes’ shifting values caused the empires to crumble because they did not want what was contributing to the success of the empire, only to their personal gain.…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
While the Roman and the Han empires were similar, they also differed. The households within both empires were run very differently. In the Roman households, they enforced a concept of pater familias, meaning the eldest male in the house would rule, this is also passed down through generations. Where as in the Han, they followed a Confucian quality,…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are many similarities and differences between the Roman and Han Empires. The similarities range from parts of the world they control to how they affected other parts of the world. The differences include who they had conflicts with, and how they settled them. But the main point to compare and contrast is the fall of the empires.…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays