Preview

Role of Takeover Regulations in Protecting Minority Interests

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4950 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role of Takeover Regulations in Protecting Minority Interests
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………. 3
NEED FOR REGULATIONS IN CORPORATE CONTROL MARKET AND THE RELEVANCE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE…………………………………………… 4
DEVELOPMENT OF THE TAKEOVER REGULATIONS IN INDIA……………………….. 5
OBJECTIVES OF THE TAKEOVER REGULATIONS………………………………………. 7
TAKEOVER CODE…………………………………………………………………………….. 7
SUBSTANTIAL ACQUISITION OF SHARES AND TAKEOVERS………………………… 8
PROTECTION OF MINORITY INTEREST………………………………………………….. 10
CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………… 15
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………………… 17

INTRODUCTION
Takeover of companies is a well-accepted and established strategy for corporate growth. International experience of takeovers and mergers and amalgamations has been varied. Nonetheless, one of its important lessons is that, its appeal as an instrument of corporate growth has usually been the result of an admixture of corporate ethos of a country, shareholding pattern of companies, existence of cross holdings in companies, cultural conditions and the regulatory environment.
In India, however, "the market" for takeovers has not yet become significantly active, though following economic reforms, there is now a discernible trend among promoters and established corporate groups towards consolidation of market share, and diversification into new areas, albeit in a limited way through acquisition of companies, but in a more pronounced manner through mergers and amalgamations. The latter course is outside the purview of SEBI and constitutes a subject matter of the Companies Act, 1956, and the courts of law, and there are well laid down procedures for valuation of shares and protection of the rights of investors.
In common parlance, a takeover bid is generally understood to imply the acquisition of shares carrying voting rights in a company in a direct or indirect manner with a view to gaining control over the management of the company. Generally speaking, there cannot be a



Bibliography: • http://indiacorplaw.blogspot.in/2012/02/minority-shareholder-protection-in-m.html • www.ashurst.com/doc.aspx?id_Content=3748 • www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid...98AA...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Companies perform acquisitions for various reasons: they may be seeking to achieve economies of scale, greater market share, increased synergy, cost reductions or for many other reasons. The acquiring company would usually proceed with the corporate action by offering to purchase the shares from the shareholders of the target company. Often, a cash offer is made but sometimes the acquiring company may offer to trade its own shares in exchange for the target company's shares. Takeovers in Australia are regulated by a combination of legislation and regulatory policy. The takeovers rules apply to acquisitions of ASX listed Australian companies, ASX-listed Australian managed investment schemes (being investment trusts), and unlisted Australian companies with more than 50 shareholders.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Lubatkin, M. (1983), ``Mergers and the performance of the acquiring firm ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 218-25. Retrieved 2012-02-03…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capitaliq Tutorial

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Acquires company for strategic reasons (access new markets, synergies, growth, etc.) • Done by firms in similar operating industries • Will pay a control premium for target firm…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to achieve economic goals, stay competitive and improve market position, firms have to advance with times by executing all kinds of strategies, one of which is acquisition. “An acquisition resembles more of an arm’s-length deal, with one firm purchasing the assets or shares of another, and with the acquired firm’s shareholders ceasing to be owners of that firm” (Sudarsanam, 2003). Serving as an important capital restructuring tool, acquisition offers firms a conceivable opportunity for development by taking over another firm economically and legally. This essay aims to demonstrate that initially firms can achieve growth by the means of the acquisition of another firm, but the long-term effect of acquisition appears to be a double-edged sword. Targeted financial indicators will be cited to support this view, and different factors, which include stock market value, shareholders’ income, firm management, external pressure, supply of resources and internal cooperation, will be discussed respectively.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does M&a Add Value?

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Bibliography: Goergen, M. and Renneboog,L., 2003. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and crossborder takeover bids. European Corporate Governance Institute Finance Working Paper Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers, Journal of Business 59, 197-216 Servaes,H., 1991. Tobin’s Q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance 46, 409-419 Kaplan,S and Weisbach,M.,1992. The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures, Journal of Finance 47, 107-138. Jensen, MC., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76, 323-329 Asquith, P; Bruner, R; and Mullins,F., 1987. Merger returns and the form of financing. Working Paper, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Business School Bruner, R., 2001. Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker. Batten Institute Working Paper, Darden Graduate School of Business Caves, R., 1989. Mergers, Takeovers and Economic Efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7 151-174 Meeks,G., 1977. Disappointing Marriage: A Study of Gains from Merger. Cambridge University Press Huang,Y and Walkling,R., 1989. Target Abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition Form and Managerial Resistance, Journal of Financial Economics Yook, K.C., 2000. Larger Return to Cash Acquisitions: Signalling effect or Leverage effect? Working Paper, Johns Hopkins Gregory, A., 1997. An Examination of the Long Run Performance of UK Acquiring Firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 971-1002 Loughran,T and Vijh,A., 1997. Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52 1765-1790 Lang,L; Stulz,R; and Walkling,R.,1989. Managerial Performance, Tobin’s Q and Gains from Successful Tender Offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24 137 - 154 Lewellen,W; Rosenfeld,A., 1985. Merger Decisions and Executive Stock Ownership in Acquiring Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 209-231 Berger,P.G and Ofek, E.,1995. Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics 37 39-65 Bloomberg for accounting and financial data…

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    International Mergers

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The difference in merger practices between U.S. companies & companies in other countries is, mergers by form of hostile takeovers or any form of takeovers, is virtually nonexistent or uncommon (Gitman & Zutter 2012). The U.S.’s emphasis on shareholder value and relying on public capital markets for financing are also a few practices generally not shared by companies in continental Europe. Gitman & Zutter (2012) also state that the U.S. approach isn’t the norm in Japan and other Asian nations either. “Both European and Japanese companies have been active as acquirers of U.S. companies in recent years” (Gitman & Zutter 2012 pg.736). Historically the British have been the most active acquirers of U.S. firms, with…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In regards to acquisitions, it is important to distinguish between mergers and acquisitions. In a merger, two companies come together and create a new entity. In an acquisition, one company buys another one and manages it consistent with the acquirer’s needs. An acquisition that involves integration has greater staffing implications than one that involves separation (Rizvi, 2008). A combining of companies is a major change. Mergers and acquisitions represent the end of the gamut of options companies have in combining with each other. It is the mergers and acquisitions that are the combinations that have the greatest implications for size of investment, control, integration requirements, pains of separation, and people management issues (Doz and Hamel, 1998).…

    • 3253 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my language, friendly takeover happens when a company (A) wants to buy another company (B). Company A firstly informs company B's board of directors, then company A offers a price. Hopefully, company B will consider this offer carefully and make a decision whether to be bought. Usually not so many companies will take offers, because a lot of people will lose their jobs, such as the managers or CEOs in company B. Also the shareholders should give up their shares, which are sometimes against their expectation. To make an example, IBM have a list of mergers and acquisitions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_IBM. Some of them are traded in private, with price not announced, such as Varicent in April 13, 2012.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business acquisition is one of the most vital tools to expand an existing business effectively. An acquisition takes place when an existing company buys another company which has more or less similar operating activities and ended up controlling it. It is clearly different from merger which is the integration of a business with another and sharing the control of the combined businesses collectively. Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have long been considered as an one of the most highly appreciated method to achieve the desired growth rate and satisfying the key stakeholders. With rapid advances in science and technology competition for the same marker has increased significantly and to remain competitive in the market business organizations have considered M&As as an imperative strategic tool. Rising of new financing promises and changes in regulations have made M&As even more popular to create new market, maintain the existing market and acquiring unique technologies and intellectual properties. However, despite being considered as a pivotal business strategy to achieve target growth the general consensus is that more than eighty percent of the M&A fail to reach the desired financial goal (Nahavandi and Malekzadeh 1993) and fifty percent simply become unsuccessful (Cartwright and Cooper 1995; Child et al. 2001, Sally Riad. 2007).…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rottig, D., (2007). Successfully Managing International Mergers and Acquisitions: A Descriptive Framework. (International Business: Research Teaching and Practice 2007 1(1) The Journal of the AIB-SE)…

    • 5544 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this essay is to describe a Case Study - Growing a Company by International Acquisition and to answer all questions form the written assignment task. To further entail other requirements, this paper is aimed to at least 4 page length, font size 12, double spaced, Bookman Old Style font, and lastly include a source list.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss and examine international acquisitions as a way to grow a business. I will use the, Times 100, case study; Davis, Growing a Company by International Acquisition as a guide for analysis. First, I will describe the two major ways to grow a company; organically by increasing the companies turnover rate, and inorganically by acquisitions. Secondly, I will be analysing the acquisition of Berendsen by the Davis Group that is examined in the case study. Thirdly I will be investigating options within the European Union for the Davis Group to grow horizontally, including any organic options available. Finally, I will discuss the options available to the Davis Group for expansion…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract The nascent debate on corporate governance in India has tended to draw heavily on the large Anglo-American literature on the subject. This paper argues however that the corporate governance problems in India are very different. The governance issue in the US or the UK is essentially that of disciplining the management who have ceased to be effectively accountable to the owners. The problem in the Indian corporate sector (be it the public sector, the multinationals or the Indian private sector) is that of disciplining the dominant shareholder and protecting the minority shareholders. Clearly, the problem of corporate governance abuses by the dominant shareholder can be solved only by forces outside the company itself. The paper discusses the role of two such forces - the regulator and the capital market. Regulators face a difficult dilemma in that correction of governance abuses perpetrated by a dominant shareholder would often imply a micro-management of routine business decisions which lie beyond the regulators’ mandate or competence. The capital market on the other hand lacks the coercive power of the regulator, but it has the ability to make business judgements. The paper discusses the increasing power of the capital market to discipline the dominant shareholder by denying him access to the capital market. The newly unleashed forces of deregulation, disintermediation, institutionalization, globalization and tax reforms are making the minority shareholder more powerful and are forcing the companies to adopt healthier governance practices. These trends are expected to become even stronger in future. Regulators can facilitate the process by measures such as: enhancing the scope, frequency, quality and reliability of information disclosures; promoting an efficient market for corporate control; restructuring or privatizing the large public sector institutional investors; and reforming…

    • 8345 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It comes 57 years after the previous one, has spent 4 years in drafting, four years in Parliament and contains 470 sections, with over 370 yet-to-be-notified rules. One-man companies, small companies, dormant companies, RoFR validity, new private placement rules, new subsidiary threshold, only two layers of investment subsidiaries, restrictions of inter-corporate loans and investments, mergers of Indian companies with foreign companies, no treasury stock, further safeguards in related party transactions, a definition for fraud, new rules for winding up, national company law tribunals – no doubt this law brings many important changes and we will discuss them in detail once the rules are out.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Privatisation in India

    • 5809 Words
    • 24 Pages

    2.A review of the role of the public sector in the Indian economy, and the process of…

    • 5809 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays