Role of Financial Intermediaries
Chapter 2
(in S. B. Dahiya and V. Orati (eds.) Economic Theory in the Light of Schumpeter 's Scientific Heritage, Spellbound Publishers, Rohtak, India, 2001)
THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION IN ECONOMIC GROWTH: SCHUMPETER REVISITED
TAPEN SINHA Chair Professor, Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (ITAM), Mexico and Professor, University of Nottingham, UK Email: tapen@itam.mx ABSTRACT Nineteenth Century Classical Economists ignored financial intermediation as an important element in explaining economic growth until Bagehot. Bagehot, for the first time, gives explicit examples of how money market developments in England could make capital flow across the country in search of the highest rate of return. However, analysis of Bagehot was incomplete. It was Schumpeter, who put the role of financial intermediation at the center stage of economic development. Curiously, renewed interest in economic growth in the post Second World War saw a development in the literature that completely ignored the role of financial intermediation. For example, Solow-Swan model of development and growth has no role of financial intermediation. For all practical purposes, the economies were seen to be well approximated by a one good (corn producing corn) model. It took the international financial crisis of Latin America in the early 1980s to force economists to take the role of financial intermediaries seriously. I examine why financial intermediation is important in the tradition of Schumpeter. There are important contributions by banks and other financial intermediaries on the economy. This process can be seen when we examine how the economy is affected when there are banking crises. Latin America provides an extremely fertile test-bed. There are important ways financial intermediaries can contribute to growth by examining the models of new growth theory in the tradition of Arrow-Romer. Elements of these models can be found in the writings of Schumpeter. Current debate about
(in S. B. Dahiya and V. Orati (eds.) Economic Theory in the Light of Schumpeter 's Scientific Heritage, Spellbound Publishers, Rohtak, India, 2001)
THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION IN ECONOMIC GROWTH: SCHUMPETER REVISITED
TAPEN SINHA Chair Professor, Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (ITAM), Mexico and Professor, University of Nottingham, UK Email: tapen@itam.mx ABSTRACT Nineteenth Century Classical Economists ignored financial intermediation as an important element in explaining economic growth until Bagehot. Bagehot, for the first time, gives explicit examples of how money market developments in England could make capital flow across the country in search of the highest rate of return. However, analysis of Bagehot was incomplete. It was Schumpeter, who put the role of financial intermediation at the center stage of economic development. Curiously, renewed interest in economic growth in the post Second World War saw a development in the literature that completely ignored the role of financial intermediation. For example, Solow-Swan model of development and growth has no role of financial intermediation. For all practical purposes, the economies were seen to be well approximated by a one good (corn producing corn) model. It took the international financial crisis of Latin America in the early 1980s to force economists to take the role of financial intermediaries seriously. I examine why financial intermediation is important in the tradition of Schumpeter. There are important contributions by banks and other financial intermediaries on the economy. This process can be seen when we examine how the economy is affected when there are banking crises. Latin America provides an extremely fertile test-bed. There are important ways financial intermediaries can contribute to growth by examining the models of new growth theory in the tradition of Arrow-Romer. Elements of these models can be found in the writings of Schumpeter. Current debate about
References: Bagehot, Walter. [1873] 1991. Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. Philadelphia: Orion Editions. Beck, Thorsten, Levine, Ross and Loayza, Norman. 1999. Finance and Sources of Growth. Unpublished Working Paper. Becsi, Zsolt and Wang, Ping. 1997. “Financial Development and Growth.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 82 (Fourth Quarter) 46-62. Cameron, R. 1961. France and Economic Development in Europe, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. DeGregorio, Jose. 1999. Estudios de Economia, 26(2), December 1999, 137-61. DeGregorio, Jose and Guidotti, Pablo E. 1992. “Financial Development and Economic Growth.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 92-101. Fernandez, David G. and Galetovic, Alexander. 1994. “Schumpeter Might Be Right—But Why? Explaining the Relation between Finance, Development, and Growth.” Johns Hopkins University SAIS Working Paper in International Economics. Gerschenkron, A. 1963. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Harvard University Press. Goldsmith, Raymond. 1969. Financial Structure and Development. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Goldsmith, Raymond. 1985. Comparative National Balance Sheets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Greenwood, Jeremy and Jovanovic, Boyan. 1990. "Financial Development, Growth, and the Distribution of Income," Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), Part 1, October 1990, p. 1076-1107. King, Robert G and Levine, Ross. 1992. “Financial Indicators and Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” World Bank Working Paper No. 819. King, Robert G and Levine, Ross. 1993a. “Finance, Entrepreneurship, and Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (December): 513–42. King, Robert G and Levine, Ross. 1993b. “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (August): 716–37. La Porta, Rafael, Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer Andrei and Vishny, Robert W. "Law and Finance," Journal of Political Economy, December 1998, 106(6), 1113-1155. McKinnon, Richard I. Money and Capital in Economic Development. 1973. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Rajan, Raghuram and Zingales, Luigi. 1998. "Financial Dependence and Growth." American Economic Review., 88, 1998, 559-586. 70 ECONOMIC THEORY IN THE LIGHT OF SCHUMPETER’S SCIENTIFIC HERITAGE Romer, Paul M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94 (October): 1002–37. Schumpeter, Joseph. [1911] 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York:McGraw-Hill. Shaw, E. S. 1973. Financial Deepening in Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press. Sims, Christopher A. 1972. "Money, Income, and Causality, American Economic Review, 62(4), Sept. 1972, pages 540-52. Solow, Robert J. 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1956, 65-94. Swan, T. 1956. "Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation," Economic Record, 1956, Vol. 32, November, 334-361.