Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Revolution 1905 Aims Achieved

Good Essays
835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Revolution 1905 Aims Achieved
To what extent were the aims of the 1905 Revolution achieved?
To a certain extent the aims of the 1905 Revolution were achieved. Every class had grievances with the government and their main aims were political reforms, land reforms, civil liberties and industrial reforms. The October Manifesto partially addressed most of the factors concerned, yet a year after the mandate, the Fundamental Laws were passed and it made the October Manifesto redundant in many aspects.
The general populace wanted a constitution and a parliament instead of an autocrat monarchy. Tsar Nicholas II had few qualities of a ruler and leader, and was politically naïve; he believed that great change would undermine his autocratic power. However his stubborn resistance to change had caused the people to suffer combined with failed crops, inflation and economic depression. A constitution would lessen the power of the Tsar and change the rule from an autocratic power to a constitutional monarchy. 77% of the population were peasants alternatively the 1% of nobility lived lives of splendour through the labours of the peasants. This led to peasants and other classes a want for the Russian class system to change.
The peasants, proletariat and bourgeoisie wanted a duma to represent, express and fight for their beliefs and rights. The duma was to be a national assembly on the basis of universal male suffrage and held the power to make laws. While the introduction of the October Manifesto on the 17th of October 1905 announced the Tsar’s introduction of the duma, Nicholas was unwilling to give up all his power. The Fundamental Laws issued in April 1906, stated he could dismiss the duma, withhold power with his ministers and make new laws when Russia was in the State of Emergency. Thus with this power, after the first duma meeting, angered by the discussions he dismissed them. While the aim for political reform was achieved, due to the Tsar’s reluctance to give up autocracy, it was consequently revoked.
Land reforms were a highly sought issue for the peasants. Russian industry plummeted into a crisis during 1900 due to the European finances contracting, and indirectly the economy experienced inflation. There was also an agrarian predicament with rural overpopulation of an annual excess of 15-18 births over deaths. At the same time emancipation of the serfs in 1861 caused many of the proletariat and peasants to be in debt. As a result, they still had to work long hours but the product was used to pay the government back for the land, many starved with the lack of nutrition.
A resolution for their revolts came in November 1905, when there was an issue of law announcing the cancelation of redemption payments from 1907 onwards. The peasants would be able to have ownership of the land they have been repaying since the 1960s, yet it would not be owned individually. It was an “allotment land” meaning they would have to share it communally, this aroused dissatisfaction and anger. Nevertheless, the aim was accomplished even if the people were not satisfied with the resolution.
Promoted by universities and intellectuals, freedom of speech was another aim of the Russian Revolution in 1905. They believed in liberty of all kinds, especially the spreading and seeking of knowledge. This was mainly influenced by Nikolai Ogarev's phrase 'apostles of knowledge’ to repay the privilege of learning by serving the people. The October Manifesto made freedom of speech and publishing available satisfying many of the intellectuals and students.
Another civil liberty that the revolution aimed to achieve was the freedom of association of a multi-party system. The government also revoked its "protective" labour laws that prohibited organization of trade unions and strikes in the October Manifesto and made political parties legal.
There was constant conflict between the 23 different nationalities and ethnic groups and the Russian rule. Freedom of religion and prevention on government's policies in dealing with all national and religious minorities was never achieved. There was a growing impatience with minority group’s inferior status and resentment against "Russification".
While the government policy of wanting to speed up industrialisation created new social groups in hopes of stabilising the economy, this created additional problems. The proletariat class was created, yet due to an underdeveloped bourgeoisie and an over populated peasantry, problems such as working conditions and safety.
The bourgeoisie wanting to gain the most profit exploited the proletariats mainly with long working hours and low rates of pay, “the average worker's 16 rubles per month could not buy the equal of what the French worker's 110 francs would buy for him". The manifesto did not address issues of poverty, low wages or poor working conditions. Further protests to achieve these aims were brutally vanquished by the returned troops from Manchuria and threats and hangings of terrorists and revolutionary leaders.
In conclusion, while the aims of the Russian Revolution in 1905 seems to have been achieved. Through manipulation and later laws, in fact, only some were briefly arranged to satisfy and calm the growing anger and frustration of the populace towards the Tsar and his beliefs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To a certain extent the divisions among the opponents of the Tsar, such as the Bolshevik and Menshevik split in the Marx party after the 1903 conference, or even the divisions among different revolutionary parties entirely, e.g. Marx and the Social Revolutionaries, was responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in this period as this led to disorganisation and lack of effectiveness among opposition. However other factors, such as the loyalty of the army, despite mutinies during the 1905, allowed the Tsar to remain in control. Furthermore actions by the Tsar himself, although not that effective, for example the reforms in the October Manifesto and the continuing support of the ruling elite was accredited to securing the Tsarists power.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    October 17 (October 30 NS) - The October Manifesto, issued by Tzar Nicholas II, brings an end to the 1905 Russian Revolution by promising civil liberties and an elected parliament (Duma)…

    • 3824 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia had many problems that were being blamed on serfdom like military unskillfulness, the scarcity of food around the country, over population in some areas of the country, civil and public disorder and finally a delayed industry caused by serfdom. In 1856, Alexander II declared to the nobility in Russia that the change was needed and this modification was that serfdom would end and the nobility would have to decide how.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Tsar Nicholas II's autocratic rulership was a main cause of the Russian Revoultion . The working and lower classes did not have any say in how the country…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The failed revolution of 1905 was perhaps the most obvious example to demonstrate that the revolution of 1917 was not caused by WWI, because the desire to rebel was fully entrenched in society by 1905. The disturbance was cause by real problems and concerns such as hunger and human rights violation, exacerbated by revolutionaries, and was unsuccessful because the real problems of the agrarian and industrial sectors did not peak at the same time. Postcards commemorating the event, particularly Bloody Sunday, represented and expressed the revolutionary ideologies of contemporaries. While a drastic increase in revolutionary mentality may have been apparent from the increased productions of seditious material after 1905, this might be misconceived because loosened censorship after the October Manifesto. Bloody Sunday pegged…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With many social and political changes occurring during the 1800's, the Russian Intelligentsia's view on the peasantry also saw a shift. Recent emancipations in the country saw millions of former serfs and farmers with newfound rights and statuses but also saw exposed many faults in current labor practices and corruption within the bureaucratic levels of the Russian state. The current nobility took it upon themselves to decide how they handle the new working class problems and restructuring of the social hierarchy among themselves and the peasants without putting too much harm on their own social standings. While many of the nobility held the staunch belief that peasantry was incapable of life beyond simple farming, some believed to be rational…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander II became the Tsar, Russia was in total disarray. Her once widely respected and feared army was humiliated on the battlefields in the Crimean Peninsula, 80% of the people were in poverty and illiterate. Russia was still stuck in the middle ages while the rest of Europe was steaming in through the Industrial Era. Alexander II saw this as a need for change, primarily in response to the Crimean War, however to be able to do this, he also had to change the Russian society, therefore in 1861 he abolished serfdom, becoming the most significant events in Imperial Russian history, giving him the name as the ‘Tsar Liberator’ (Watts, Peter, History Review, 2014). However, although Alexander II’s reforms did pave the way for a more educated,…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The revolutionaries of 1848 had varied aims, largely based upon their own social classes. The working classes had very simple and practical aims, largely based upon improving their own working conditions, asking for higher employment levels and greater wages. However the middle classes, the self-appointed leaders of the revolution, had more ambitious aims, fighting for the unification of Germany and constitutional monarchies. Many of these more ambitious aims were not to be achieved until much later, as ultimately the revolution failed, but what did they manage to achieve, and why did the revolution fail?…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays