Preview

Policy of Appeasement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Policy of Appeasement
How far was Britain having no allies the reason why the British government adopted a policy of appeasement?
By the mid 1930’s the government was concerned about growing fascist power in Germany and Italy. Having no allies was very anti-war and that was one influence on the government when they adopted the policy of appeasement. It was also felt that the Paris Peace Settlement was too harsh and a policy of appeasement would allow for revision of the harsher parts of the treaty. Britain also had Economic concerns and a fear that if Nazism was defeated then communism would fill the gap. Britain also had no-one to turn to with their allies so appeasement was the only option. The League of Nations failed and Britain felt “rather fascism than communism.” The unwillingness of Britain through the slaughter of WW1, made them turn to a policy of appeasement. The only problem was people trusted Hitler and probably would not trust anyone else. And finally, Britain’s large empire would not stop another Great War if Hitler was going to announce it.
The arrival of fascist military dictatorships in the 1930’s took British military planners entirely by surprise. The heads of Britain’s armed forces had consistently warned Chamberlain that Britain was too weak to fight. At the same time, Hitler’s propaganda encouraged Britain and France to believe that Nazi forces were stronger than they really were. Nazi film of soldiers marching into the Rhineland hid the fact that the soldiers were raw conscripts barely able to march in straight lines. Nazi tanks shown at rallies were often cardboard outlines placed over ordinary cars. But at the time British politicians did not know that. The fighter planes and radar that saved Britain from defeat in 1940 were still at the development stage in the late 1930’s. Britain needed time to rearm.
When the Treaty of Versailles was made started, Hitler just about broke every single rule in the 1930’s. Most of the British public felt the Treaty of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    interventionist policies in all aspects of British life, and needed much stronger powers than in…

    • 539 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a consequence for not standing up to stop a situation at the first sign of trouble. Unfortunately, that consequence was one that the world had to pay because the world leaders did absolutely nothing to stop Hitler at the first sign of trouble. They just let Hitler continue with what he was doing in order to “keep the peace”. However, they didn’t realize that by letting Hitler do these things, they were opening a door to a world tragedy that would change history as we know it forever. Some of the factors that contributed to appeasement being incorrect was Sudetenland becoming German territory, Hitler gaining more support as time went on, and Germany taking control of Austria.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also, as you can well imagine, Hitler was still angry about the treaty of Versailles as where other Germans who believed that…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline 31.1

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    iii. The British, however, had no desire to confront the German dictator. Some even thought that Hitler’s actions constituted a justifiable response to the terms of the Versailles treaty, which they believed had been too harsh…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also one of the main reasons was the radar systems, this ment that the british could she where georigg placed the piolets. TheBritish had in place in 1940 an entire network of long-range early-warning radar stations whose reports were tightly integrated by Fighter Command. This was the Chain Home radar system, the first radar-based air defense system, which was ready just in time for the Battle of Britain. Hitler had great faith in his undefeated Luftwaffe, and with good reason. Comprised of more than 2400 fighters and bombers, it would face Britain's 900 fighters.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a result of France's swift defeat in World War Two, Britain was alone in the war from the 22nd June 1940 until June 1941, when Germany invaded Russia at the start of Operation Barbarossa. Whilst alone, the months from July to September 1940 were seen as the climax of British military resistance; the Battle of Britain. Had the Royal Air Force not been able to stave off the Luftwaffe's attacks, the consequences could have been severe, not just because of the likely Nazi invasion with Operation Sealion, but for the Allies as a whole. It must be understood that the Battle of Britain was by no means the only event that brought about a change and encouraged and end to World War Two. It's importance will be evaluated in relation to that of other…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    From 1933 to 1934, during the consolidation of Nazi party and the process of Gleichschaltung, the Nazi party presented themselves as a less aggressive force than they would later prove to be. The Nazi party had considerable popular support in Germany from 1933 due to their strong opposition to the Treaty of Versailles. When Germany withdrew from the League of Nations and the World Disarmament Conference in October 1933, this was eagerly accepted in Germany due to its association with the Treaty. A Non-Agression Pact was signed with Poland in 1934 and this significantly bolstered the Nazi party’s image in the international scene. Hitler reinforced this new image of a peaceful Germany in a speech in May 1933 stating “The French, the Poles etc. are our neighbours, and we know that through no possible development of history can this reality be altered.” In June of 1935, Germany signed the Anglo-German Naval Treaty with Britain in which Germany agreed to have only 35% of the size of the British Army. For the Germans, this signified the end of the military terms of the Treaty of Versailles and was used as propaganda to promote the Nazi party in Britain. With the rest of Europe lulled into a false sense of security about Hitler’s foreign policy aims, a policy of ‘brinkmanship’ was employed.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill is often considered one of Great Britain’s most important and effective leaders during World War 2. There are many reasons for this. Even though Churchill had remained outside of government for a period of time, he made speeches warning of Germany’s growing power. He also spoke out openly against Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, plan’s for appeasement with Nazi Germany. However, when Nazi Germany attacked Poland the public saw that Churchill knew this was going to happen. Just two days after the attack on Poland Churchill was once again made First Lord of the Admiralty. When Nazi Germany attacked France it was time for a new leader. Appeasement had not worked and on the same day that Chamberlain resigned King George VI asked Churchill to become the new Prime Minister. Churchill was what Britain needed, he was a strong speaker and did whatever it took to get his side to win whatever the matter. Three days after becoming Prime Minister he delivered one of his most famous speeches titled, “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat.” This speech along with many others is what provided Britain with the morale boost they…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler’s power began to rise during the 30s, many Americans still believed that they could avoid the issue through a policy of appeasement (Document G), though it failed and both Britain and France…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930s, lots of politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair. Hitler's actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - The British people had to want war - In 1938, public opinion was against war - so the policy of appeasement was sensible.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays