Preview

Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
838 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq
The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least. Many things brought the world to the point of another world war. One reason was when Japan invaded Manchuria. Manchuria was an area rich in iron and coal. In 1931, the Japanese army seized Manchuria, despite objections from the Japanese parliament. Engineers …show more content…
I think the most effective response is with out a doubt collective security. (Doc 4) In 1938 Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler to discuss his demand for the Sudetenland. Hitler got what he wanted from this meeting because of appeasement. Europe was happy from this because it avoided war. This did not benefit the Czechs at all though. For some reason Neville Chamberlain favored appeasement. (Doc 5) He thinks appeasement is the best way because he believes war is a "fearful thing." He thinks that appeasement will benefit Europe. Winston Churchill disagreed with Chamberlain's policy of appeasement. (Doc 6) He believed that keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor. He also thinks we lost many opportunities in the quest for peace. He believes it was the people in control of our political affairs fault. Another view on appeasement was also put out there by A.J.P. Taylor. It stated that since the majority of German people put Hitler into power they were the only ones that could turn him out. Also he said some "appeasers" feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by Russian domination over most of Europe. In another excerpt an author named Keith Eubank states that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue. (Doc 9) He says that Hitler had too massive of a force and that nothing he had done had been considered that dangerous at that point in time. All this options but still if the rest of the country didn't do something besides just keeping appeasement Hitler was going to just keep demanding more and more. This would have left Europe ten times worse off. They made the right choice on going into Collective Security. They should have done this from the beginning instead of wasting so much time and losing so much, to just end up going into war anyways, just later in time. Collective Security

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Causes of Wwii

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the period previous to World War II causes that led to World War II included German attempt of imperialism in Europe, pro-appeasement ideologies towards German military expansion, and ignoring con-appeasement ideologies towards German military expansion.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement was the British foreign policy adopted by Chamberlain in the wake of World War Two. This policy was seen as cowardice and Chamberlain received huge criticism for maintaining it throughout the road to war and died with the title of the man who was too coward to stand up to Hitler and his Nazi Germany which led to World War One.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why was the world plunged into WWII in 1939, what is the most effective response to aggression, appeasement, or collective security?…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another result of appeasement was Hitler gaining the support he needed as time passed. Lastly, Germany took control of Austria. The Holocaust and many other events could have been avoided if the world leaders did not choose to give in to the demands of Hitler. Even though the world leaders thought they were doing the right thing to protect their nation by standing by and doing nothing as Hitler went forth with his plans, they were actually hurting their countries even more because by choosing to appease Hitler, they allowed him to do things that would change the world…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were various ways World War II could have been prevented. Small events led to the immediate cause of World War II, these events could have been averted. Isolationism should have been ended and Fascism could have been fought prior to the death of millions. Countries were selfish, especially the U.S., when it came to getting involved in foreign affairs. Many countries faced their own economic depression and issues, resulting in political leaders turning their concern away from the threat of Germany.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After World War I created instability with in Europe the stage was being set for another world war that would follow a mere two decades later. Germany was both unstable politically and economically and with the help of Hitler they were determined to get back on their feet. Hitler began rearming the country and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan in order to gain more ground on his goal of world domination. Hitler invaded Poland in September of 1939 and as a result Great Britain and France were inclined to declared war on Germany. World War II…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles has been said to be the most important, indirect cause of WWII. After Germany was defeated in World War I, they were forced via the Treaty to pay heavy reparations to the victors. Their economy could not take the pressure from the harsh reparations and it quickly fell…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian P.O.W's

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First of September 1939 the world was about to change again as the Second World War commenced ironically and tragically, the events which occurred at the end of WWI were destined to trigger WWII especially when the Treaty of Versailles was put into place. Not everyone was happy with the treaty. Adolf Hitler invaded Poland on 1st September 1939, triggering the WWII. Japan then started to invade South East Asia and posing a threat to Australia, this encouraged the Australians to enlist to defend their country.This resulted in many falling into the hands of their enemy, the Japanese. When Japan entered the war as they were also dis-satisfied with their treatment in the treaty, a whole number of issues arose, in addition to the ongoing war in Europe.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of Wwi Dbq

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Around the 1900s, there were ways that caused the war. In the following documents; Causes of WWI, Schenck vs. United States, Imperialism, and Isolationism this is how WWI all formed. In Doc 2, Causes of WWI, countries from all over the world formed together or separated from each other to prepare for the war. Austria Hungary and Germany, Russia and Serbia, and France and Russia all aligned together. Alliances are a double-edged sword because there are many different countries that have all different weapons to fighting against each other and different amount of people fighting from each country. In addition, European nations had divided into two opposing alliances. According to American History Textbook, the Central Powers were made up of Austria-Hungary,…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremiah

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main causes of World War II were nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, and resentments resulting from the World War I and the interwar period in Europe, plus the effects of the Great Depression in the 1930s.The culmination of events that led to the outbreak of war are generally understood to be the 1939 invasion of Poland by Germany and Soviet Russia and the 1937 invasion of the Republic of China by the Empire of Japan. These military aggressions were the result of decisions made by the authoritarian ruling Nazi elite in Germany and by the leadership of the Kwantung Army in Japan. World War II started after these aggressive actions were met with an official declaration of war and/or armed resistance.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appeasement policy, which can be defined as a diplomatic policy that hopes of preventing war by making concessions to an aggressor, was displayed by Great Britain towards Germany in the preface to World War II. However, it proved to be a spectacular failure, because leaders of the countries that were being appeased were taking advantages of these policies and were building up their own power since other world leaders would not take any decisive action. Numerous factors consisting social, economical and political aspects formed the basis for the pursuing appeasement in the aftermath of World War I.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement which was done by chamberlain was to satisfy Germany for preventing war. Actually, at that time, Germany was demanding many things which it lost through Treaty of Versaille. Chamberlain who was British prime minister thought Germany was too punished and had rights to return their prohibited things, and he also thought if he did appeasement, it will make Hitler who was the leader of Germany satisfy and war won't happen. So appeasement started. Nowadays, in general, people think Chamberlain was wrong and he shouldn't do appeasement. But it isn't true. Even if appeasement failed and war started, I think appeasement was good.…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there has always been conflicts that started within a country, spread to be between two countries and later escalated to become a worldwide problem. There has only been two conflicts throughout time that has escalated to become such a worldwide issue that it has turned into a world war. The event that lead to World War Two was the Holocaust or Shoah. The Holocaust started slowly and grew from the years 1933 to when it ended in 1945, with the conclusion of World War Two. It started with discrimination, and then alienation, before persecution and murder occurred.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays