Preview

Performance Appraisal Tyes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Performance Appraisal Tyes
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance appraisal, also known as employee appraisal, is a method by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated (generally in terms of quality, quantity, cost and time). Performance appraisal is a part of career development.

Types include -

Behavioral Observation Scales

Behavioral Observation Scales is frequency rating of critical incidents that worker has performed.
• The BOS was developed by Latham & Wexley (1977) who believed that both graphic rating scales and BARS require supervisors to make vague judgments.
• The BOS is a list of critical incidents behaviors which the supervisor has to rate in terms of frequency.

2. Rating scales
We use 5 scales as follows to identify frequency of behavior.

• Never
• Seldom
• Sometimes
• Generally
• Always

3. Identification of critical incidents
Items indicate either desired or undesired aspects of work performance, for examples :
• Worker misses workdays ________
• Worker never needs her/his work to be double checked

FORCED RANKING (Forced distribution)
Definition of forced ranking (forced distribution)
Forced ranking is a method of performance appraisal to rank employee but in order of forced distribution.

For example, the distribution requested with 10 or 20 percent in the top category, 70 or 80 percent in the middle, and 10 percent in the bottom.

The top-ranked employees are considered “high-potential” employees and are often targeted for a more rapid career and leadership development programs.

In contrast, those ranked at the bottom are denied bonuses and pay increases. They may be given a probationary period to improve their performance.

2. Application of Forced Ranking
GE, Ford Motor, Conoco, Sun Microsystems, Cisco Systems, EDS, Enron and a host of other U.S. corporations have adopted similar policies of this method

3. Advantages and disadvantages of forced Ranking
Advantages:

• They force reluctant managers to make difficult

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The goal of each appraisal feedback session should look to improve and provide the employee with valuable information needed to advance and excel within the organization (Cascio W. , 2010, p. 341). Appraisals are also in compliance with the Labor Relation Laws of India and the documentation required to terminate an employee if need be. The use of comparisons or ranking systems may be a negative reinforcement system in terms of feedback per the India cultural and socio-economic systems in place (Bhal, 2002). This will also add to the divide of the cultural systems currently in…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 303 Week 3 Assignment

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is performance appraisal and why is it important? Performance appraisal is the process through which employee performance is assessed, feedback is provided to the employee, and corrective action plans are designed. (Youssef, C. (2012)) The main objective of performance appraisals are to evaluate a employee’s work performance, they are also important for organizations to use because they reflect the effectiveness and efficiency of achieving organizational goals and objectives. They are used to manage salaries, wages, and pay adjustments. They also provide performance feedback for employees and communicating points of strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegel Case Summary

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such systems often include the use of rating or ranking levels in which each employee is positioned. These systems often use quotas to place a part of top performers at the peak level and the worst performers at the bottom level. Such a system is considered to eradicate those within the organization who constantly perform below par. The system is able to work if employees are mindful of the standards for which they are graded in advance, so they can make the required modifications. It can also remove those inside the organization who are either not appropriate for precise jobs or simply lack the skills and abilities to execute their jobs efficiently (Myers,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At many times these structures use percentages to rank those who are more productive at high ranks and those least at low ranks. According to The Union Times, Five percent of the company was evaluated when the system was put into pace in 2000. A, B, or C grades were given to employees. Employees receiving a C could lose bonuses and raises, and two back-to-back C 's would possibly result in termination. Those involved in the class believed that before the grading program, they had received approving evaluations. Because of the new system, those evaluated, got C 's while some women and minorities with less work history or experience received greater ranks…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Assuming that the system is wisely constructed and effectively executed, a forced ranking system can provide information that conventional performance appraisal systems can 't.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    20-70-10 vs. a-B-C

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, like anything else, this framework does not come without pitfalls. By ranking an employee into that bottom 10%, it makes them less visible as they are in the “firing zone.” Who is to say, your HR team didn’t put the employee in the incorrect department? However, now that they are in the 10% zone, it will make the move from department to department even harder because now they are stereotyped as a poor performer. Today, we live in a dog-eat-dog world where you are rarely safe unless you control everything. This framework boosts the…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Palindrome Case Study

    • 5267 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Qwerty Instruments Company is a large manufacturer of state-of-the-art PDAs. Its product line is geared towards providing the marketplace with proprietary software that uses the PDA environment. Over the past fifteen years, the company has grown from twenty to nearly three thousands employees. The company business strategy is one of continued expansion through internal growth by focusing on product quality and value.…

    • 5267 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My opinion on forced ranking is that it works to motivate employees up to a point. It also introduces negativity into the evaluation process that may permanently scar the team members who stay behind. If employees start slamming each other to protect their jobs, it can get ugly and after the dust settles, the remaining team members must still work together but negative actions won't be forgotten. It could lead to less trust within the team which hurts morale and productivity over the long run.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Behavioral Inappropriateness – behaviors that are not necessarily problems but they are behaviors that happen at the wrong time and/or place.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Force ranking is a performance intervention, which can be defined as an evaluation method of forced distribution where managers are required to distribute ratings for those being evaluated into a pre-specific performance distribution ranking (Cooper and Argiris, 2011). Meisler defines force ranking “as a workforce-management tool based on the premise that in order to develop and thrive, a corporation must identify its best and worst performers, then nurture the former and rehabilitate and/or discard the latter. It's an elixir that in these slow-growth times has proved irresistible to scores of desperate corporate chieftains - but indigestible to a good many employees".…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper should include sections on the strategic advantages of performance appraisals, potential forms of bias within the appraisal system, as well as how performance appraisals can contribute to the achievement of strategic objectives.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fortune 500 Similarities

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Office of Advocacy, there are 29.6 million businesses in the United States. Surprisingly, 99.9% of them have fewer than 500 employees. Thus, there are only about 18,000 large businesses in the United States today (Office). The most outstanding 500 of these 18,000 companies are placed on premier business list in the world, the Fortune 500. If a corporation manages to make this list, they have basically done everything right; they have treated their employees very well and promoted a happy and healthy working environment, they have adapted to change tremendously in today’s fast-moving world, and they have been the frontrunners and leading innovators in their particular industry. With that,…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Performance Appraisal

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages

    ‘The problems associated with performance appraisal systems can be overcome by improvements to their design and implementation’. Discuss with reference to the orthodox and radical critiques of performance appraisal.…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A performance appraisal is a process in which a rater or raters evaluate the performance of an employee. Feedback may occur throughout the workday, but many organizations also have a more formal process of providing feedback to employees. As stated by Jonathan Segal, “The performance appraisal lets top performers know, in a concrete way, how much they are valued by the organization. As such, it is a necessary component of a comprehensive employee retention program” (Segal, 2000). A few of the benefits those appraisal systems can provide are: communicating deficiencies, ensuring consistency, distinguishing among employees, recognizing valued performers, and communicating strategic vision. The performance appraisal process requires supervisors to take note of what is lacking in employee performance at least once a year. Without this process, supervisors may be hesitant to tell an employee that their work is not up to standards. It may also increase the potential for consistency by ensuring that all similarly situated employees are evaluated on the same criteria.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance Appraisal

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. what is? Involves the identification—what areas of work should be exam, should focus on performance that affects organizational success…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays