Preview

Comparing Co-Workers Against Each Other: Does This Motivate Employees?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Co-Workers Against Each Other: Does This Motivate Employees?
Case 5.1: Comparing co-workers against each other: Does this motivate employees? This case takes a critical look at using comparative methods to review and evaluate employees and exposes the impact of those methods on productivity and morale. "Forced Ranking" had occurred for many years at GE, instigated by the famed ex-CEO Jack Welch who had managers categorize their reports into three categories: the top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent, and the bottom 10 percent. This process has been shown to work well for about two years because it eliminates the least productive workers and strengthens the core team. After two years the benefits decline since the core team has now become stronger and eliminating the weakest links are no longer critical. After two years, the cut-throat mentality starts to take hold and employees know that they must portray themselves in the best possible light while playing up any negative factors about coworkers to help reinforce their positions. This behavior discourages innovation and leads to infighting as well as avoidance to risks which stagnates the company from growth and new ideas. This case goes on to look at best practices and techniques used by Yahoo who "made substantial changes to its rating system which compared employees' performance to an absolute standard rather to each other" (Ivancevich, Kinopaske, Matteson, 2008, p.135) My opinion on forced ranking is that it works to motivate employees up to a point. It also introduces negativity into the evaluation process that may permanently scar the team members who stay behind. If employees start slamming each other to protect their jobs, it can get ugly and after the dust settles, the remaining team members must still work together but negative actions won't be forgotten. It could lead to less trust within the team which hurts morale and productivity over the long run. I believe that forced ranking should be introduced sparingly in instances where upper management

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Amba 610

    • 2992 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Organizations globally invest a lot of resources in advertising, recruiting strategies, and tactics to attract the best candidates available in their field. This process of identifying and implementing formal assessments methods to select potential employees is complex, but essential in creating value for the company and shareholders (Bagley& Savage, 2010). Selecting the right employee and the process of continued motivation through performance appraisal are important in organizations efficiency and effective use of employees. Organizations have many options to utilize while screening for employees. Screening strategies choices not only assist with efficiency, but also match people with the job. Tools that organizations can utilize are job applications, resumes, interviews, background, reference checks, personality testing, drug screening, honesty and integrity test and a host of other procedures (Wright, Domagakski, & Collins, 2011). Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the performance of employees and helps understand the abilities of a person for further growth and development (MSG, 2012). Appraisals are designed to help employees understand their roles, objectives, expectations, and performance success (Bohlander…

    • 2992 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employee motivation is the level of energy, commitment, and creativity that a company's workers bring to their jobs. Motivation refers to the initiation, direction, intensity and persistence of human behavior.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, there are situations in which supervisors have to deal with difficult employees and some employees have called out the report line about their supervisors. However, when it is time for evaluating employee’s performances, supervisors might feel tempted to inflate their rating because they are afraid that if they give them a lower rate is because they are retaliating. Most of the supervisors prefer to give an intentional rating inflation and keep their jobs than given a rate that can end up losing their jobs. Moreover, unintentional rating inflation can occur when supervisors have to evaluate a group of employees in a giving time just to fulfill their deadlines (Aguinis,…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Distorted performance ratings are an unwanted common occurrence with most performance management systems (Aguinis, 2013). Since many performance management driven by people, distorted ratings whether inflated or deflated will oftentimes be the result of human intervention. This means that rating deflation is an intentional act on behalf of the person evaluating the employee achieve a certain agenda or goal (Wang,Wong & Kwong, 2010). The motivation of the rater to achieve a certain goal for the outcome of the performance evaluation ties directly with that individual’s motivated to deflated the performance rating (Murphy, Cleveland, Skattebo & Kinney, 2004). If the supervisor’s goal or intent is to disciple, force an employee to resign, or build a case to terminate an employee, the supervisor can use to the performance appraisal process as a tool. The supervisor will be motivated to deflate the scores of employees that feel like are poor performers and want to make the employee react through the performance management process will use rating deflation. Rater deflation can only be mitigated not completely prevented. One way to lessen the effect of ratings deflation is to set an overall performance evaluation goal (Kin Fai Ellick & Kwong, 2007). If the team’s goal is above average, the rater will try to…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In our group discussion, we considered how to convert an existing individual appraisal system into a team-performance appraisal system. The subject matter of our conversation ranged from incentives for lower-level employees through lump-sum bonuses and spot bonuses to team and organization-wide incentives, which focuses on increasing productivity and morale by giving employees a sense of participation in and identification with the company (Cadrain, 2003). Our team report will focus on individual fairness, and how it affects team performance, successful strategies in discouraging social loafing, and how the employee takes responsibility within the sales team.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roberts, G. E. (1998). Perspectives on enduring and emerging issues in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 301-320.…

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maybe it’s me but when I look at the process that a lot of organizations use to evaluate their managers I see an awful lot of problems that have a lot of negative consequences ... Hey, we all [managers] want to be evaluated fairly and in a meaningful way but we are not always so willing to do that for the managers that work for us ... It is a paradox for sure. (Observations of a Senior Manager – Fortune 500 Organization.)…

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stack Ranking my view

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is increasingly difficult to implement and enforce for companies or divisions within a company that have large portion of high performance employees, thus they don’t follow such ‘bell shaped’ distribution. Therefore many companies do not simply ‘rank and yank’. They use stack ranking mainly to determine the compensation as a way to motivate workers. Such compensation usually include BSMA (Base Salary Merit Award, or a.k.a. annual salary increase), Bonus payout and KCA (Key Contributor Award, which is extra bonus paid to small percentage of top performers).…

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Donaldson, C. A. (2004). Performance Management: Forced Ranking. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from Menu of Interventions: http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/arossett/pie/Interventions/forcedranking_1.htm Grote, D. (2002). Forced Ranking: Behind the Scenes. Across the Board, 40-45. Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2011). Organizational Behavior and Management (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. McGregor, J. (2006, January 9). The Struggle to Measure Performance. Retrieved February 16, 2011, from Bloomberg Businessweek: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_02/b3966060.htm Nickols, F. (2007). Performance Appraisal: Weighed and Found Wanting in the Balance. The Journal for Quality & Paricipation, 30(1), 13-16. Nickols, F. (2010, May 5). Performance Appraisals: A Final Criticism. Retrieved February 26, 2011, from Articles by Fred Nickols: http://www.nickols.us/afinalcriticism.pdf…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    forced distribution system

    • 7871 Words
    • 51 Pages

    Purpose – Performance appraisal based on a forced distribution system (FDS) is widely used in large…

    • 7871 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organization behavior

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I think that forced ranking performance appraisals dose not motivate employees. It would create a scenario that people only focus on competing, backstabbing each other and protecting their own prospects instead of encouraging employees to focus on innovation and collaboration. This would cause the lack of cooperation between group members. Companies may inevitably using forced ranking, firing someone who might go on to be a super star elsewhere or discouraging excellent performers by ranking them as mediocre simply to fill a quota. Replacing lower-rank employees each year can also be costly and can lower productivity in the early months of adoption.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a growing debate about the relevance of employee performance appraisals. On the one hand, performance ratings are considered by many academics and practicing managers as essential personnel management tools. They are used in recruiting and hiring, in compensation administration, in training and development, and as a motivational tool. On the other hand, a sizeable number of business managers believe that this practice may generate more problems than it solves. For one thing, the design of performance appraisal systems is usually flawed. A recent survey of Fortune 100 companies shows that practicing managers and performance appraisal researchers have very different concerns. For instance, the former tend to place more importance on the appraisals' processes and behaviors, while the latter attaches more value on its cognitive aspects.…

    • 16404 Words
    • 66 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Under this appraisal method, managers will compare their subordinates’ performance, and then rank each in order from ‘best’ to ‘worst’ (Stone, 2010)…

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Baker Reflection Paper

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Secondly, the traditional system of employee feed back and evaluate should be changed. Executives cannot just evaluate employee depend on individual performance but should evaluate employee as a person who associate with a whole organization and work in system. The thinking that each individual person and unit is urged to best so that the whole will become its best and the each individual will makes greatest contribution to the company is not rational.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    project proposal

    • 2316 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Worldwide, performance appraisals are used in nearly all organizations. There are different tools and number of goals that performance appraisals focus to examine individual’s performance and potential of development, (Leena and Twinkle, 2012: pg01-06). Therefore, the general area of our study is performance appraisal systems in organization. Only minority activities in personnel management are concerned with evaluating employees as individuals.…

    • 2316 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays