Outbound
Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tppc20
Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Production Planning & Control 2012, 1–10, iFirst
Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production
Sanjay Sharma*
National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Vihar Lake, Mumbai-400087, India (Received in final form 2 February 2012) In the supply chain situation, a decision regarding supplier relationship is of high importance. This usually happens on the basis of supplier company parameters. In order to satisfy the demands, a buyer company often expects the supplier company to expedite their operations, i.e., to enhance the related production rate. In this context, presently the focus of this article is on the cyclic production environment at the supplier company premises. Any practical production process is expected to generate defective products also along with the normal usable
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tppc20
Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Production Planning & Control 2012, 1–10, iFirst
Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production
Sanjay Sharma*
National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Vihar Lake, Mumbai-400087, India (Received in final form 2 February 2012) In the supply chain situation, a decision regarding supplier relationship is of high importance. This usually happens on the basis of supplier company parameters. In order to satisfy the demands, a buyer company often expects the supplier company to expedite their operations, i.e., to enhance the related production rate. In this context, presently the focus of this article is on the cyclic production environment at the supplier company premises. Any practical production process is expected to generate defective products also along with the normal usable
References: Boute, R., 2008. A win-win solution for the bullwhip problem. Production Planning & Control, 19 (7), 702–711. Cannella, S., Ciancimino, E., and Framinan, J.M., 2011. Inventory policies and information sharing in multiechelon supply chains. Production Planning & Control, 22 (7), 649–659. Flynn, B.B. and Flynn, E.J., 2005. Synergies between supply chain management and quality management: emerging implications. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (16), 3421–3436. Kuei, C., Madu, C.N., and Lin, C., 2011. Developing global supply chain quality management systems. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (15), 4457–4481. Romero, D. and Molina, A., 2011. Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning & Control, 22 (5–6), 447–472. Sarker, B.R. and Babu, P.S., 1993. Effect of production cost on shelf life. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (8), 1865–1872. Sharma, S., 2004. Optimal production policy with shelf life including shortages. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55 (8), 902–909. Sharma, S., 2006. Incorporating fractional backordering in the multi-product manufacturing situation with shelf lives. Proc IMechE, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220 (7), 1151–1156. Sharma, S., 2008a. Effects of an increase in manufacturing rate in the context of cyclic production. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39 (7–8), 821–827. Sharma, S., 2008b. A modification for the carrying cost estimation with respect to the flexibility in production rate. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36 (11–12), 1252–1260. 10 S. Sharma shelf life considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (6), 1703–1711. Viswanathan, S. and Goyal, S.K., 2000. Incorporating planned backorders in a family production context with shelf life considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (4), 829–836. Wu, Y., Dong, M., Tang, W., and Chen, F.F., 2010. Performance analysis of serial supply chain networks considering system disruptions. Production Planning & Control, 21 (8), 774–793. Xu, Y. and Sarker, B.R., 2003. Models for a family of products with shelf life, and production and shortage costs in emerging markets. Computers and Operations Research, 30, 925–938. Sharma, S., 2009. Revisiting the shelf life constrained multiproduct manufacturing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (1), 129–139. Silver, E.A., 1989. Shelf life consideration in a family production context. International Journal of Production Research, 27 (12), 2021–2026. Silver, E.A., 1990. Deliberately slowing down output in a family production context. International Journal of Production Research, 28 (1), 17–27. Silver, E.A., 1995. Dealing with a shelf life constraint in cyclic scheduling by adjusting both cycle time and production rate. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (3), 623–629. Viswanathan, S. and Goyal, S.K., 1997. Optimal cycle time and production rate in a family production context with Downloaded by [Natl Inst of Training & Indust Eng] at 22:40 10 March 2013