Preview

Open Source Software Reasearch Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1055 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Open Source Software Reasearch Paper
IT302
11/18/12

Research Assignment Week 6

Free and Open Source Software has been around for quite some time. Free software has always been a controversy. This time someone is trying to take a stance against it. More than just someone but a major software company namely Microsoft. The whole issue is coming against software patents. Patents are there to protect the make, use, and selling of an invention but in this case would deal with software. Microsoft is not keen on the idea of software being readily available especially to businesses at little to no cost. In the business world this is unheard of. To let companies take control and create custom software with almost no cost is being attacked. Microsoft is quoted in a CNN Money article: “Microsoft takes on the free world” as saying, "We live in a world where we honor, and support the honoring of, intellectual property," They were quoted as calling this a matter of principle. I can understand principle and I’m definitely not against making money. I believe that enough is enough. Free and Open Source Software is there to benefit the public. In suggesting that business owners need only buy licensed software or that business owners are only obligated to purchase said software is irrational. Putting aside costs, theoretically let’s say there is a software developer that is hired by a company to create custom software. This company favors Linux rather than Windows not to say that Windows isn’t a great operating system but to say that someone does not have the freedom to create is ridiculous. To limit this company because of some alleged patent laws is preposterous. Eben Moglen, longtime counsel to the Free Software Foundation and head of the Software Freedom Law Center, says that, “software is a mathematical algorithm and, as such, not patentable.” This statement is critical because of the seeming less attack on inventors and software developers. Software has always been improved and with the strict patent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This file of ECON 545 Week 3 Discussion Question 2 Anti-Trust Policy and Microsoft consists of: Is Microsoft a monopoly? In what ways could it be consi...…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free software is software that gives you the user the freedom to share study and modify it. We call this free software because the user is free. 1. Operational Characteristics, 2. Transition Characteristics, 3. Revision Characteristics.…

    • 638 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    see if Microsoft was trying to create a monopoly of the computer software market. They…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Microsoft licensed its operating system more cheaply to computer makers such as Dell and Compaq, if they exclusively installed its software.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    linux unit1 assignment1

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Answer: Free software is software that users have the freedom to distribute and change. The three main characteristics of free software are: The source code has to be distributed with the program, you cannot restrict people from redistributing/modifying/using the software, and users must be allowed to redistribute modified versions under the same terms/licensing.…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is well known that the Microsoft Corporation is the largest computer operating system manufacturer in the United States. The in late 1990’s, more than ninety percent of all personal computers that were sold were equipped with Microsoft [ (Wright, 1998) ]. Software companies felt secure in writing their programs in the Windows platform, knowing that their software would be compatible for most people’s PCs. With most software now being written for Windows, computer manufacturers would then install Windows in their products, confident that consumers would buy it. This is how the Windows monopoly was created.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Security is a large part of Microsoft’s industry, it is vital to the company as well as it stakeholders, shareholders, employees and its customers. Microsoft creates and develops the software that is used globally so ensuring fair trade and fair play across all borders. Microsoft along with its competing companies spends much of their time, efforts, and funds on the security, and integrity of the products they develop and distribute. Just imagine if a customer purchases a program from Microsoft, downloads their personal information onto this software then, the customer finds out that their sensitive information has been breached. This customer would not be inclined to stay with Microsoft. This would cause a drop in Microsoft’s revenue, and a drop in future business. Microsoft creates, develops, and distributes software which reaps high revenue, while reinvesting much of their profit to secure their product. Microsoft Believes that, sometimes sacrifices must be made in order to maintain the integrity of Microsoft and its…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Free Software Foundation (www.fsf.org) is the principal organizational sponsor of the GNU Project. GNU developed many of the tools, including the C compiler, that are part of the GNU/Linux Operating system. Linux is the name of an operating system kernel developed by Linus Torvalds and expanded and improved by thousands of people on the Internet. Torvalds’s kernel and GNU’s tools work together as the GNU/Linux Operating System…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capitalism is a great part of the American dream, but disproving the claims goes beyond believing that Microsoft was exercising their right and ability to be a capitalist company. The root of the belief that Microsoft had violated the antitrust laws was found in the fact that the Department of Justice claimed that Microsoft illegally bundled their software products to create one product to monopolize the market. However, Professor Edward Felten, the government’s computer science expert witness, clarified the distinction between the software products and their codes. Felten described the code and product as different things and therefore the products were two separate products instead of one product as thought by the Department of Justice. (Chin,…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wagner, Dana. "The Keepers of the Gates: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, and the Regulatory Implications of Systems Technology." Hein Online. Web. 07 Apr. 2012. .…

    • 6411 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world’s biggest software maker felt that it had been robbed, so much so that they posted a high-level summary of 235 patents that were allegedly violated by Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), including the Linux Kernel, Samba, OpenOffice.org, and others .Microsoft does not play when it comes to patent infringement, but did they have a case?”… So if Microsoft ever sued Linux distributor Red Hat for patent infringement, for instance, OIN might sue Microsoft in retaliation, trying to enjoin distribution of Windows. It 's a cold war, and what keeps the peace is the threat of mutually assured destruction: patent Armageddon an unending series of suits and countersuits that would hobble the industry and its customers.” (Parloff may 28, 2007). Shortly after that, Microsoft entered into a series of three contracts with Novell, one of which was a patent agreement that basically said, “Don’t sue us and we won’t sue you.” So now the question is “At the time of the scenario, some dire consequences were predicted for FOSS. How has FOSS fared since then?” From what I have researched so far FOSS generally has still faired fairly well through the whole ordeal. The GNU still viewed as a pinnacle for open source software and distribution. The Deal with Novell was made to walk around the GPL of the GNU and expose loop holes for Microsoft’s gain but also creating a pressing dilemma for the GNU. The deal struck between Novell and Microsoft was a “we don’t sue you and you don’t sue us” which indicates that not only was FOSS involved in patent infringement but also Microsoft. The Deal included over 200 million dollars to Novell and 43 Million to Microsoft for “license distribution” of Novells’ Server software. Linux has grown from its earlier days as a fringe operating, evolving more and becoming more wide spread as a use for servers.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a rule utilitarian point of view, from a macroeconomic perspective, granting software patents by giving the exclusive right to sell, use, and make for a certain number of years might persuade people to explore new ideas, thus increasing and promoting innovation.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open/Closed Source

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Open source software, on the other hand, has a much broader explanation for its foundation. Many developers see open source as a way to contribute and make a difference. Others support open source so as not to rely on any single person or company for their software needs. Still, others see it as a way to compete against certain companies who may want to monopolize the industry.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics Microsoft Case

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Investigation into Microsoft began in 1991 by the Federal Trade Commission under suspicion that the company broke anti-trust laws and engaged in coercive activities prohibiting competitors from entering or participating equally in the market. “The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power and monopoly market structure on Intel-based personal computers in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales “(The Microsoft Monopoly, 1998). The primary concern of the Federal Trade Commission and eventually, the Department of Justice, was whether Microsoft should be able to bundle its own web browser, Internet Explorer with the Microsoft Windows operating system. In 1998, The Department of Justice brought an antitrust suit against Microsoft. The suit included “twenty U.S. states suing Microsoft for illegally thwarting competition in order to protect and extend its software monopoly” (United States v Microsoft). In the end, “Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled that Microsoft, with its Windows program, possessed monopoly power over a particular kind of operating system” (Rothstein, 2001). Later, the ruling was over-turned in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and in September 2001, the DOJ announced that it was no longer seeking to break up Microsoft as previously ordered by Judge Jackson. It would instead impose less of a penalty.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Open Source Software

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Free Open Source Software also known as FOSS has fared pretty good since the Microsoft posted a high-level summary of 235 patents that were allegedly violated in 2006. Since this scenario happen FOSS has grown and partner up with big name companies. In an interview that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said that ”We live in a world where we honor, and support the honoring of, intellectual property, FOSS patrons are going to have to play by the same rules as the rest of the business. What is fair is fair." Today FOSS is still going strong because of its high quality and because the most important reason it is FREE.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays