"Only God has the right to take life"
No one has the right to kill someone except god and by that we mean naturally, when you’re supposed to die but where does it stop being Gods responsibility and start becoming other people’s actions? If we think of the people who would agree with this kind of statement, it would obviously be strong religious people. Christians follow the Sanctity of life and this states life is god given meaning only god should be able to control who lives and who dies. It states how killing is murder and that life is a sacred gift from god and therefore only he has the right to take it back. Roman Catholics believe that if only god has the right to take life, this means that abortion is sinful and should not be allowed. Only god has the right to end a pregnancy and humans should not be given this power. They also believe abortion is wrong because they believe life starts at conception and therefore aborting a pregnancy however early it is is murder in the same way killing a new born baby which everyone would agree is inhumane. Following on from this, Catholics feel that you are destroying god’s image and that is a sin. Also every human has the right to live and why is it fair to deprive humans of the remarkable opportunity of life? Regardless of what most people assume, Christians have slightly different views on topics, both believe abortion is evil but feel that it is sometimes the lesser of two evils and in all circumstances the should do the most loving thing, and if abortion is the most loving to do. So in cases such as rape, where it is not fair for the mother to live with an unwanted child, or for that child knowing it was the result of a sickening act. Or whether the birth will cause harm to the mother or child, putting either of them in risk of death or disabilities. Christians believe that life does not begin at conception and therefore by terminating a pregnancy you aren’t committing murder. Lastly, we ponder why the sanctity of life can be broken in other areas such as war and self defence and whether there could be grounds for abortion. The only problem is that for a non-religious person, you can’t expect someone who you can’t see, can’t hear, can’t communicate in any way to, should be the one to decide whether you have to go through 9 months of agonizing pain if it causes you problems in any way. If this pregnancy was going to put your life in risk, it would be better to have an abortion and “kill” the soon to be child who know one knew, rather than die yourself and as a result, a mum, wife, sister and daughter are lost, surely its more worth it just to wait and have another child or adopt? Or in another case, if the new born child will have a life of suffering, whether that’s long term or not, it isn’t fair to bring a child up knowing they are deprived and unhappy, they may have a smile on their face but they would be in much less discomfort if never born. Although it sounds harsh making the lives of the parents so much easier, financially, mentally and physically!
Many people would agree, the thought of only god being able to control who lives and who dies, why should he? He doesn’t feel the pain that you do when all your body aches from the chemotherapy, or the hatred you feel when you want to rip the eyes out of the man who murdered your little girl, or the guilt that takes over you from when you know it was your speeding that caused you to crash and kill your wife. He doesn’t have the right, because it’s not him who has to live with the consequences. Following on from that, it’s your body therefore it should be your choice to choose whether you live or die. In the case of suicide, you have to be in...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document