Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nation divided

Good Essays
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nation divided
U.S. History
November 17, 2013
Lincoln Calhoun
Lincoln and Calhoun Up until 1860 politicians made efforts to maintain a balance between the Northern and Southern states. After Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860 the Southern States believed that the balance of power had shifted away from them. While they wanted to preserve the Union, Lincoln was a known abolitionist and slavery seemed to be under attack. Calhoun and Lincoln both gave many speeches about the preservation of the United States, but each had their own agenda on how to do it. Calhoun stated that slavery was a “positive good” and that the Union and abolition cannot coexist. What he meant was that if the Union were to continue to live and prosper then slavery must remain a very prominent institution in the United States. Abolition would do nothing but bring down our nation and bring about anarchy. While Calhoun was wrong about America needing slavery, he was right about the chaos that would follow abolition. The United States would enter into a Civil War over the matter. Not only the war but, the United States just recently ended segregation. Calhoun was a racist who believed that the founding fathers did not include African Americans in the Declaration because white would always be supreme, but he did foresee the fall of the nation in its current state. Lincoln was a well-known abolitionist and knew that the country could not survive with slavery being a primary source of half the nation’s income. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided”. Lincoln delivered one of the greatest speeches of all time with his House Divided speech. He seemed like he was literally telling everyone the nation’s future. “It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South”. Lincoln knew that slavery would either be fully diminished or spread throughout the entire country. Lincoln tried to push for the abolition of slavery, but the Southern states would not stand for it. Violence began to erupt and war was beginning to seem inevitable. There were also many catalysts to the war. One of them being the slave revolt led by John Brown. Brown's attempt in 1859 to start a liberation movement among enslaved African Americans in Harpers Ferry, Virginia, electrified the nation. He was tried for treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia, the murder of five men and inciting a slave insurrection. He was found guilty on all counts and was hanged. Southerners alleged that his rebellion was the tip of the “abolitionist iceberg” and represented the wishes of the Republican Party to end slavery. Historians agree that the Harpers Ferry raid in 1859 escalated tensions that, a year later, led to secession and the American Civil War. “But I feel no consciousness of guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention and what was not. I never had any design against the life of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason, or excite slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do so, but always discouraged any idea of that kind”. John Brown thought that God had given him a quest, and he was a very loyal servant of God. Brown believed he was doing the right thing, to many he was, but to many he wasn’t. The South viewed the revolt as an act of Northern aggression towards slavery and ultimately helped push towards a war. The war was inevitable, no matter what compromises legislature could stir up, the North and South were divided and the only thing that would fix that, was either the abolition or expansion of slavery.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lincoln’s opening lines of his speech, he establishes that he knows that neither attitude has changed. The North is still pressing for expulsion of slavery and the South is still pushing for expansion of slavery. However, he establishes that slavery is not the point of his address. He uses words such as “extended,” “pursued,” “progress” and “reasonably satisfactory” to show that his main points are the effects the war will have on future generations. He does not address the issue with a condescending tone: he speaks in a supportive, optimistic way that encourages unity.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the significant increase in industries in the North protective tariffs such as the tariff of 1828 greeted extreme tension between the north and the south. The tariff of 1828 was keyed the term "the tariff of abominations" by many southern because of as extreme rates. This tariff under president Jackson was opposed by V.P Calhoun who wrote the South Carolina exposition and protests, which similarly to the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions under Thomas Jefferson, stated that the federal government did not have the right to set these tariffs and that particular right is reserved for the states; Calhoun was a strong advocate of the states rights. South Carolina threatened to succeed the union with Calhoun saying “ the union next to our liberty most dear..” in response to Jackson’s strong statement “ our union it must and shall be preserved.” Henry Clay, the great compromiser, comes up with a compromise for the tariff, substantially while South Carolina agrees not to succeed the union. Tariffs such as the tariff of abominations created greater tension between the North and the South;…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the middle of March during the year 1782, the great state of South Carolina was blessed with a man named John Caldwell Calhoun. From South Carolina to Connecticut Calhoun was a graduate of the Tapping Reeve Law School after completing his undergrad at Yale. He knew exactly what he wanted and within three years of being accepted to the South Carolina bar he had win his first election into congress in 1810. With many powerful ideas Calhoun had planned to make an incredible impact on this country and the direction it was headed. From the House of Representatives to Vice President he made waves and ruffled feathers to make sure he and his home state had a voice. John C. Calhoun was politician who believed in states rights and the power to secede…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Why does Lincoln in the “House Divided” speech believe the pro-slavery side was winning regarding the expansion of slavery in the territories? Why does Calhoun in opposing the Compromise of 1850 think the South was at a disadvantage? Because starting the new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, and was the first point gained…… Although each side received benefits, the north seemed to gain the most. The North had absolute control over the government. The South…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn't know how much they would effect it. States' rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his "Doctrine of Nullification". Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations', as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, didn't seem to be partisan either way, and, although he was a Whig, always came up with a way to please both sides of any argument.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Stoowe Research Paper

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Lincoln’s himself perspective to say he doesn’t allow they keep slaves. But to the whole country, the congress will allow they keep slave system. The lucky thing is Lincoln win the war and destroy the slave system.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While President Lincoln entered the Union, along with the promise of preserving the Union, the possible abolition of slavery was added to the turmoil of the conflict. Prior to the Civil War, race relations had mostly been left under the jurisdiction of states. Individuals, such as Jefferson and Madison, advocated the importance of states rights and introduced the concept of nullification in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Such ideals were later embraced by Calhoun in response to the Tariff of Abominations in 1828, and the idea of possible secession became a true threat in the Nullification in 1832. However, the maintenance of balance between free and slave states in Congress brought slavery to the national forefront, and number of Compromises, including that of 1850, requires the cooperation of varying regions.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When President Lincoln first took office, his view on slavery is that he can’t and has no position getting rid of it in the states where it already exists. In his first Inaugural Address, he explains, “ I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it already exists.” This greatly expresses his view in that, slavery is not his to deal with at all. Another example of this, also stated in Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, “. . . the right of each state to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgement exclusively, is essential to that balance…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun was born on March 18, 1782 and died on March 31, 1850. He was an American Politician and a political theorist. He began his career as a nationalist, modernizer, and a proponent of a strong national government. Over time his views changed and he became a greater proponent of states’ rights, limited government, nullification and free trade, he saw this as the only way to save the Union. He was very well known for his intense defense of slavery as a positive good his distrust of majoritarianism and for pointing the south toward the secession from the Union. Calhoun built his reputation as a political theorist by his redefinition of republicanism to include approval of slavery and minority rights, with the Southern states the minority in question. To protect minority rights against majority rule, he called for a "concurrent majority" where the minority could sometimes block offensive proposals that a state felt infringed on their sovereign power. Always distrustful of democracy, he minimized the role of the Second Party System in South Carolina. Calhoun's defense of slavery became defunct, but his concept of concurrent majority, whereby a minority has the right to object to or even veto hostile legislation directed against it, has been cited by other advocates of the rights of…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Lincoln's letter to Horace Greeley he said "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery." On December 20, 1860 the South seceded from the Union before Lincoln addressed his view on slavery for fear of losing it. This brought tension between the North and South and was one of the reasons the civil war began. "What I do about slavery and the colored race I do because I believe it help to save this Union." Lincoln makes it clear that if he needs to emancipate the slaves in order to save the Union he will do…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, in document A, Senator John C. Calhoun states, “I have, Senators, believed from the first that the agitation of the subject of slavery would, if not prevented by some timely and effective measure, end in disunion.” Senator John C. Calhoun also states, “The agitation has been permitted to proceed, with almost no attempt to resist it, until it has reached a period when it…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the election of Abraham Lincoln was not the only reason for secession, but a rather a series of rooted problems. Sectional tensions between northern and southern states arose as early as the 1840s when America first began its westward expansion into new territories. Every new territory added raised the question of its position on slavery, as the balance between free and slave states was fragile. In an attempt to gain supporters and appeal to both citizens from the north and south, Douglas introduced the idea of popular sovereignty i n which the citizens of the territory would choose whether it entered the Union pro-slavery or anti-slavery. While this may have seemed like a good idea at the time, it did not prove to be so good in Kansas.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1854, Lincoln stated the following as an abolitionist of slavery. “This declared indifference, but as I must think, real covert zeal for the spread of slavery, I cannot but hate. I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself.” He was more desired to promote equality, and this could only happen in the authorities and powers operated on making people feel free rather than being slaves. He was aware that the U.S constitution would grant freedom to the slaves since it was part of the clause, which is stated in the U.S Constitution following the democratic strategies.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was unlawful in half of the states and lawful in the other half. Abraham Lincoln knew the country could not survive half free and half slave and that a “house divided against itself cannot stand." He knew the country would become either all slave, or all free. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was viewed as a “fundamental shift of power” (Forner 504). His election caused fear in the south that slavery and their entire way of southern life was at risk.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He said in his 1858 speech delivered in Springfield, Illinois, “Although I have ever been opposed to slavery, so far I rested in the hope and belief that it was in the course of ultimate extinction.” Lincoln states he was not anti-slavery but he did see it as a problem in the Union. His election angered the south because President Lincoln didn’t see slavery as a necessity anymore. He believed the races had the same rights, "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and even spoke of the contradiction of having slaves in a country where “all men are created equal,” in the same speech he gave in Springfield. Lincoln’s election only pushed the South further to…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays