Preview

John C. Calhoun's Political Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John C. Calhoun's Political Theory
John C. Calhoun was born on March 18, 1782 and died on March 31, 1850. He was an American Politician and a political theorist. He began his career as a nationalist, modernizer, and a proponent of a strong national government. Over time his views changed and he became a greater proponent of states’ rights, limited government, nullification and free trade, he saw this as the only way to save the Union. He was very well known for his intense defense of slavery as a positive good his distrust of majoritarianism and for pointing the south toward the secession from the Union. Calhoun built his reputation as a political theorist by his redefinition of republicanism to include approval of slavery and minority rights, with the Southern states the minority in question. To protect minority rights against majority rule, he called for a "concurrent majority" where the minority could sometimes block offensive proposals that a state felt infringed on their sovereign power. Always distrustful of democracy, he minimized the role of the Second Party System in South Carolina. Calhoun's defense of slavery became defunct, but his concept of concurrent majority, whereby a minority has the right to object to or even veto hostile legislation directed against it, has been cited by other advocates of the rights of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln’s poisition on slavery differ from that of Stephen Douglas. Abraham Lincoln believed that the slavery was very uncommon and scary that it scared the supreme court to declare that the Constitution can not extend slavery in the new states. Lincoln was scared to spread slvaery in the new territories which was connected with the Dred Scott decision of 1857. Stephan Douglass on the other hand argued for the popular sovereignity. Mostly advocating the territories that the people could extend slavery by not following the law, he supported the Dred Scoot deciison of 1857.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He comes to us, too, as the Great Emancipator who headed the North off to Civil War to free the slaves and subsequently offered his kindred Southerners a delicate and forgetting hand. Lincoln was the man who headed the slaves into the common war and eventually liberated them from the Southerners, whom he'd lended a hand after the war. This is the generally speaking perspective of Lincoln, which isn't fully accurate, and is demonstrated to not be totally right however history, demonstrating that he didn't have totally intensive and reliable perspectives and didn't dependably help nullification. He acknowledged how wrong it was that subjection ought to exist whatsoever in a self announced free and edified republic. Lincoln's emotions of the Declaration of Independence, which inside and out say that all men are made equivalent, disaffirm his nations agreeableness and shared traits around bondage. This at last pushes Lincoln to change his perspectives on subjection, instead of supporting it before and all around the war, while it was vital. Kansas-Nebraska Act -The enactment toppled the old Missouri Compromise line, which rejected subjection from the limitless northern zone of the old Louisiana Purchase domain. The demonstration then built another recipe for managing subjection in the national grounds: now Congress might stay out of the matter, and the individuals of every region might choose whether to hold or bandit the organization. This gesture toppled the Missouri Compromise which had awhile ago avoided region in the Louisiana Purchase domain and besides counteracted Congress from mediating, permitting the individuals to take care of their own issues with prominent power. This gesture advanced Congress' freedom to its nation and made it recoil and provided for it no force in the bargains and contentions its nation was managing and additionally left open a yawning opening of chance for professional bondage control. At that point in 1857 came the notorious Dred…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln entered the Presidency rooted in the beliefs that the executive branch’s power came second to the legislative, as stated in the Constitution. His “immediate predecessors—Democrats Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan—had set the pattern for a weak executive, conceiving their roles as little more than clerks...who either approved or disapproved legislation developed from Congress’s agenda,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). However, following the secession of seven southern states immediately after Lincoln’s election, his focus became reuniting the union: “he sought to reassure his fellow countrymen and to prevent more states from seceding,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). To accomplish this, Lincoln was headfast in his decisions, often reaching beyond traditional executive power and, in effect, overriding the other branches of government. These decisions were extremely controversial: Groiler Encyclopedia says, “As a commander in chief Lincoln was soon noted for vigorous…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the middle of March during the year 1782, the great state of South Carolina was blessed with a man named John Caldwell Calhoun. From South Carolina to Connecticut Calhoun was a graduate of the Tapping Reeve Law School after completing his undergrad at Yale. He knew exactly what he wanted and within three years of being accepted to the South Carolina bar he had win his first election into congress in 1810. With many powerful ideas Calhoun had planned to make an incredible impact on this country and the direction it was headed. From the House of Representatives to Vice President he made waves and ruffled feathers to make sure he and his home state had a voice. John C. Calhoun was politician who believed in states rights and the power to secede…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after the War of 1812 had ended under Madison’s reign, America had come to a period popularly known as the “Era of Good Feelings.” The Americans had just come out of a great battle, emerging victorious, thus proving themselves to be a competent world power. However, although the time period after the War of 1812 was dubbed the “Era of Good Feelings,” growing tension due to a sudden rise of southern nationalism under John C. Calhoun, too much involvement from the government, and disagreements over slavery created such disunion that the nation descended into utter chaos. The so-called “Era of Good Feelings” was, in fact, a misnomer – not only was it not a time of good feelings, but it was actually a period of great disunion.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun was born March 18, 1782 in South Carolina. He was known as the "cast iron man" for his rigid defense of Southern beliefs and practices. Calhoun was elected into legislature in 1808. Two years later Calhoun moved into the House of Representatives. Calhoun is part of the Democratic Party. He also went to serve as a U.S Secretary of War and helped steer the United States into war with Great Britain. John C. Calhoun was elected into Congress in 1811. Calhoun supported state's rights and defended slavery. Calhoun strongly supported the War of 1812. After the treaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812, Calhoun was responsible for creating the Second Bank of the United States. Calhoun wanted to be president…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander H. Stephens was an American politician from Georgia. He was Vice President of the Confederate States of America and a democrat. The “Cornerstone Speech” was very famous because Stephen mainly focuses in the struggle between the north and south which was, slavery. In the document written by Alexander H. Stephens, the “Cornerstone Speech” of March 21, 1861 was significant because he announced that the new government believed on the idea that blacks were inferior to whites. This fundamental truth was the crucial difference between the northern and southern society. Slavery played a major role in the southern economy on a day to day basics.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War was a decisive and important part of American history. The north and south had radically different ideas of the direction the country should take and tension had reached a boiling point. The two different viewpoints can be seen in speeches made by John Smith Preston and Abraham Lincoln. John Preston’s speech to the Virginia state legislature outlined the south’s viewpoint and reasons for seceding while Abraham Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address outlined why the south could not succeed and his duties as president.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the Unites States Constitution, Jackson attempted to act as a guardian; but he only protected its content when it benefited his popularity or ran parallel with his stances on governmental issues. Jackson was most definitely disappointed with his vice president, John Calhoun, when he emerged as the leader of the states’ rights uprising in South Carolina. As outlined in document F, they were ready and willing to deny enforcement of any federal law or the upholding of any constitutional right that negatively affected their state. Most Jacksonians denounced South Carolina’s demand for the right to nullify federal laws as treasonous. When South Carolina mentioned nullification of the “tariff of abominations,” Jackson tried to appease the Southerners, by loosening the tariff so as to make it more favorable for the South, in order to avoid their future use of nullification. This illustrated his attempt to uphold the federal powers outlined in the constitution and prevent individual states from claiming rights not granted to them. In addition, Jackson followed strict construction of the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    who had once terrorized the law abiding middle class. Calhoun believed that “slavery instilled in…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln’s main stand on politics were to abolish slavery and give more rights to African-Americans.“The North's victory meant the end of slavery in the South, a land…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Caldwell Calhoun was born on March 18, 1782 in Abbeville, South Carolina. He was a prominent United States statesman and spokesman for the slave-plantation system of the antebellum South. He was a nationalist at the beginning of his political career. He was a congressman from South Carolina. As one of the leading War Hawks, he helped steer the United States into war with Great Britain in 1812. Calhoun was responsible for establishing the Second Bank of the United States. He also wrote the bonus bill that would have laid the foundation for a nationwide network of roads and canals but President James Madison vetoed it. Calhoun served as United States Secretary of War. He was a candidate for the presidency in 1824. He…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaftsbury's impact on Locke's expert vocation and his political contemplations can't be downplayed. As one of the originators of the Whig party, which pushed for sacred monarchism and remained contrary to the overwhelming Tories, Shaftsbury granted a point of view toward decide and government that never left Locke.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Calhoun thought that because slavery has been a part of society for so long suddenly putting and it too it would cause chaos within the society. “Too maintain the existing relations between the two races, inhabiting that section of the Union, is indispensable to the peace and happiness of both. It cannot be subverted without drenching the county in blood, and extirpating one or the other of the races. Be it good or bad, it has grown up with our society and institutions, and is so interwoven with them, that to destroy it would be to destroy us as a people (Calhoun)”. Calhoun thought that by keeping the institution of slavery around it would continue to keep the balance in…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays