Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Explain why and how the role of the federal government changed as a result of the Civil War with respect to TWO of the following during the period 1861-1877.

Good Essays
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain why and how the role of the federal government changed as a result of the Civil War with respect to TWO of the following during the period 1861-1877.
Since the time of British colonization in the New World, sectionalism had played a major role in American politics. Differing geographies and climates had lent to development of varying types of economies. While he north dominated shipbuilding and trade, the South became dependent on the exploration of cotton, rice, tobacco, and indigo for revenue. Such contrasting economies ultimately led to different attitudes towards the welfare of the nation, particularly those which involved slavery, and views most often fell along sectional lines. Individuals such as Crawford, Calhoun, Clay, and Webster advocated for their individual regions, while still hoping to advance in the national goal. However, by the early 1860s, it became clear that compromise was no longer a viable solution. Sectional tensions surrounded the civil war, and the role of the federal government would greatly change in terms of race relations and economic development during the period between 1861 and 1877. While President Lincoln entered the Union, along with the promise of preserving the Union, the possible abolition of slavery was added to the turmoil of the conflict. Prior to the Civil War, race relations had mostly been left under the jurisdiction of states. Individuals, such as Jefferson and Madison, advocated the importance of states rights and introduced the concept of nullification in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Such ideals were later embraced by Calhoun in response to the Tariff of Abominations in 1828, and the idea of possible secession became a true threat in the Nullification in 1832. However, the maintenance of balance between free and slave states in Congress brought slavery to the national forefront, and number of Compromises, including that of 1850, requires the cooperation of varying regions. However, the federal government passed a number of Revolutionary amendments during the Reconstruction Era. Government had become further centralized during the war, and exercise of increased executive power enabled the government to enact a number of bold acts of legislation. First of all, the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments were all ratified in the Reconstruction Era. Following the abolition of slavery as stipulated by the 13th amendment, freedmen were also ensured a number of rights and granted suffrage. Even among the Radical Republicans, including Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, there was a lack of consensus on the Constitutionality of the 14th and 15th amendments. Both granted more power to the federal government than ever before. Federal government also successfully represented groups such as the Klu Klux Klan. With military presence in the South, federal legislation was enforced. Additionally, support for the Freedmen’s Bureau and other programs was widespread amongst Northerners and effectively enacted in the South for a brief period. It was not until after military reconstruction in 1877 after the election of Hayes, that federal policies regarding race relations became ineffective. In terms of economic development, the Civil War and Reconstruction Era was a boom for industry in the North. New industrial innovations continued to be made and factories became prolific in cities in the North. Since progressive reforms were yet to be made. factory owners were able to exploit their work force, which had become primarily immigrant by the 1870s, and yield the greatest profit. In addition, better communication systems in the North had helped in searing a Union victory. Railroads, canals, and turnpikes connected various parts of the Northern to Western regions. This period of time would open the door to nearly half a century of unlawful practices by railroad owners, including pooling, rebates, and monopolies. The federal government took a lassiez faire stance in terms of economic development, and the supreme court consistently began to cut in favor of big businesses. The Civil War Era and Reconstruction period set the stage for private industry to thrive, and further stratification among American economic classes. Additionally, the Federal government played a further role in economics by advocating a new national currency system, which would provide a sound monetary banking system behing which the Guided Era could unfold.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the second decade in the 19th century, American was going through tough times. The War of 1812 was raging causing destruction throughout America while many domestic issues divided the nation. One of the most major issues was the New England Colonies’ feelings of sectionalism while the South was as nationalistic as ever. In 1820 however, the roles reversed as the South became the regionally favored area while New England became a larger support of the country. This swap is due to the economic changes that occurred between 1815 and 1820. Economic developments such as trade tariffs, slavery issues and the industrial revolution created a new commercial environment adjusting the views of the citizens of said regions. Without this economic shift, the Northern States would have garnered more support to break away from the US while the South would have wanted to preserve the union.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Civil War, the Northern and Southern cultures were accepted. By the 19th century sectional antagonism began to slowly decrease from the disagreements and disputes leading up to the Civil War. This made the United States truly ‘one nation.’ Slavery being the main cause of the Union, began to influence a good outcome.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The non-extension of slavery into the western territories disrupted the nation in the 1800s. President Lincoln’s indifferent attitude towards slavery interfered with the nation southern states and states where slavery existed. Lincoln cared about the union as it was unraveling. Most people at that in the North supported a war to restore the Union but not as a military crusade to end slavery. The American Civil War was an economic conflict not a race issue between the Union and the Confederacy.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War DBQ Essay

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of two documents, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth amendment, President Lincoln was able to achieve this feat. “Lincoln noted the morality of his decision, writing that he believed emancipation to be "an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity." The document had immediate practical benefits as well, as the British government backed away from recognizing the Confederacy soon after Lincoln issued the Proclamation” (Behrend). Clearly, freeing the slaves through the Emancipation Proclamation was the best course of action. Due to the bold declaration, Lincoln was made a statement of the Union’s power which deterred a powerful foreign entity from joining the war. Not only does the Constitution, which is the highest law in the land, justify Lincoln’s action, they were morally called for. If not for the Civil War, our nation would have continued to support a dark practice which enslaved fellow human beings. Along with achieving the goal of freeing slaves, the Emancipation prevented Britain from joining the war. This would have tipped the scale in favor of the South and could even jeopardize the nation’s freedom. The Thirteenth Amendment was also necessary to free all slaves. “This amendment abolished slavery and gave Congress the power to pass laws to enforce the abolition...The end of the Civil War and the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Congress letter by John Randolph in 1816 discussed how Congress should regulate commerce and not levy taxes. The taxes favored manufacturers, and they became wealthy, while the southern farmers were extremely poor because of these duties (Doc A.). Along with extreme taxing, came great expansion west because of the population growth. This would seem like a good thing, but only to some parts of the US; particularly the North. The “National Road” was the first improved road to be funded by the federal government. Therefore, the north received roads, canals, and federal aid. The East received protective tariffs, and the South received close to nothing. Slavery was still prominent in the south, and no government aid was provided. In a letter from Anna Hayes Johnson in Charleston, South Carolina, to her cousin in Raleigh, North Carolina, she discusses the slavery dispute in the North and South. Slavery was temporarily dealt with by the Missouri Compromise in 1820; but it was not until later that a permanent abolishment was made (Doc G.). Another instance of Sectionalism was the Panic of 1819. What caused this was the deflation in crop prices; especially cotton as Britain demanded drops and cheaper resources. Also, over speculation of the land made the western farmers unable to pay loans from the US banks. The Bank of the US had suddenly tightened their credits; which incorporated tougher loan requirements, and requirements for specie from state banks. Lastly, politically, sectionalism was very obvious. In maps of popular votes and electoral votes from 1820 and 1824, it was clear that by 1824, different states had begun to vote for different presidents (Doc I.). Eventually, the US was divided into different political parties; and thus, political emerged and changed the US forever. In summary, sectionalism had emerged and what seemed…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1880 to 1860, The United States of America went through social, political and economic changes, which affected the North and South in different ways.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nullification Crisis was led by John C. Calhoun in result of the increased Tariff of 1828, known as the Tariff of Abominations. South Carolina declared these tariffs to be unconstitutional and threatened to leave the union. Calhoun proposed the nullification theory which stated that each state had the right to obey a federal law or to declare it null and void. Andrew Jackson, who favored states’ rights, did not approve of disunion. In result, Jackson issued a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina stating that nullification and disunion were treason and he threatened to take military action.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emancipation Dbq

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflict erupted due to the point of high tension between the continuous dissension over the critical issue. Lincoln supported emancipation as a war measure for the beginning of the war in order to gather support for the Union. Lincoln declared that he will side with border states who abolish slavery. He hoped that support from these critical states would play a decisive role in the war. Emancipation was still seen as a war measure because there was significant opposition from the conservative supporters. However, Lincoln explains to a religious group that emancipation would actually restore legitimacy for the Union in Europe, as the consensus there was set on an antislavery sentiment. This would prevent European dependence on textiles and undermine King Cotton diplomacy. In order to set a moral framework, Jefferson Davis explains that emancipation would hurt slaves and the basis of his argument was that slavery was a justifiable evil. Lincoln still doesn’t fully oppose Davis by taking the position of abolitionism. Instead, he viewed emancipation only as a war measure and doesn’t extend full rights. Davis views it as an immoral act as it would create revolts and a race war in the South. The issue with compromise positions was that they were mostly ineffective in containing slavery in the South. Instead, they created dissent throughout the congress, making the critical issue worse. A motive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Mexican war, it was a very large concern that the new land acquired during the war would become slave states. In reaction to this concern, David Wilmot, a congressman from Pennsylvania proposed a bill that stated that any lands picked up through the duration of the war would become free states. The bill was never passed, however it politicized finally and definitively ever since the Missouri Compromise. The Northerners wanted a president who would abolish slavery and the South clearly did not, so when Lincoln, a “Black Republican”, became presidential candidate South Carolina threatened to and eventually did secede from the union.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Nullification Crisis

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nullification crisis represented sectionalism, as a cause to the Civil War by creating hostility and conflict between the North and South. The South was extremely opposed to the Tariff of Abominations and the following Tariff of 1833. Sectionalism is defined by petty distinctions at the cost of well being. The Southern states didn't need protective tariffs because their economy was already very stable from the wealth of the cotton industry. Therefore, the tariffs only stopped their foreign trade and did nothing to benefit them. South Carolina became so enraged that when Congress declared the tariff on 1828, many of the southern people said they were going to back out of the union or secede. After this, Vice President Calhoun, who was born in South Carolina, wanted to legally resist the tariffs. He created the idea of nullification in 1828. John Calhoun wrote the "South Carolina Exposition and Protest," which declared the tariff null and void in South Carolina. Nullification was the theory that a state had the ability to declare invalid a federal-level law. So when the national government instituted a tariff, Calhoun told the South Carolina that they could simply refuse to pay it.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was divided on slavery and the Norther States abolished slavery while the southern states embraced it. The northern states above the Missouri Compromise of 1820 did not allow slavery. The United States economy played an important role in slavery were it either strengthened or weakened it. The northern states did not have a strong agricultural business due to the type of hard and rocky soil that proved…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays