Preview

Money in Politics

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Money in Politics
Money in Politics

In the world of politics today there are many problems. Nasty campaigning and

Slamming ones opponent have become commonplace in today's world. This is a very

Distinct problem. Yet the root of the problem isn't the candidates themselves, in most

Cases. The national committees for the republicans and the democrats is at the true heart

Of the problem. The money which is spent by those massive institutions to their

party's candidate in each election is staggering. Therefore the problem lies not in the

candidates themselves, but in the money which is used to finance their campaigns.

Campaign finance reform is a hot topic these days yet none the less a very important

topic which must be addressed.

Campaign financing has very specific rules, which are governed with an iron rod.

However the major party's have found ways to cheat. A loop hole which must be closed

To ensure that democracy thrives for many years to come. The rules for campaign

financing are simple. Individuals are permitted to give, $1000.00 per candidate per

election. Where as interest groups are allowed to donate $5000.00 per candidate per

election. These are relatively small amounts compared to the hundreds of millions of

dollars spent by both major party's this election season. So where does the money come

from? The answer to this question is quite simple. The national committees of the major

party's, have many accounts which are non-federal. These accounts are used to accrue

what is known as soft money. There are no limits on how much the party's can spend at

local levels for grass roots party building. So the money in the non-federal regulated

accounts is funneled to states, which use the money to endorse or bash one of the

candidates. The answer to the problem is simple reform the laws which govern campaign

financing.

While the answer may be simple achieving the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Account for the failure of 3rd parties to break the monopoly of power held by the Democrats and Republicans…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘invisible primary’, also known as the money primary, can be define as the period of time between the first party presidential candidates announcing their intention to run for president and the first primary. The ‘invisible primary’ allows candidates to raise funds for the upcoming primary elections and to garner public support. The fund raising figures and opinion polls are used by the media and campaign teams to predict who the front runners for the nomination are. This is seen as a crucial stage of a campaign for the presidency, as candidates who raise the most money are going to appear the strongest, and as a result will be able to raise even more money from those donors who are seeking to engage in ‘pork barreling’ or sponsoring candidates so their future interests are ensured.…

    • 897 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Essay

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page

    correct way. This was one of the many reasons that the political parties formed in the first place.…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coffman Swot Analysis

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The American Democracy Legal Fund (ADLF), the group that filed the complaint with the U.S, House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics. The ADLF also wants Rep Coffman and 22 other Republicans to tested for using political resources for campaigning.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Setting a regulation to funnel the wealthy elite’s money into super PACs takes away power from the everyday individual and their right to have a government by the people for the people. Also, it perpetuates corruption due to the super PACs not being legally obligated to disclose their spending, which is known as “dark money”. This continues the cycle of corruption by decreasing transparency of a candidate, making the candidate and their interests less known to the public. Due to this, he public is unable to make informed decisions to better not only their own lives, but the entire country through their vote (Levy 1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ted Cruz Pros And Cons

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The campaign of freshman Senator Ted Cruz has announced that it made an impressive donations haul since he announced that he was running for president. Touting his connection to grassroots voters, the senator also downplayed the role that big money donors have played in funding his campaign. Overall, the campaign has received $14 million in three months, a sum that gives his campaign enough money to go up against fundraising juggernaut and front runner Jeb Bush.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    corporations and unions provided unprecedented amounts of soft-money contributions during the 1996 and 2000 election cycles. At the same time, the Federal Election Commission had its budget cut, making the commission virtually helpless to prevent the parties from skirting existing campaign finance laws. In light of the impact soft money made on elections, reformers believed soft money must either be eliminated or severely limited. The McCain-Feingold legislation imposed a soft money ban on all federal elections. It also limited the amount of soft money contributors may give to state, district, and local committees. The ban on soft money was one of the highlights in the legislation, but it was expected to come under attack in light of Buckley v. Valeo. Critics of the soft-money ban argue that the contribution of money to political parties is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. In December 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of these limits by a vote of 5–4. The McCain-Feingold legislation actually increased the amount of "hard" money that individuals and other supporters could contribute. The amount of money individuals might contribute to state parties in federal elections increased from $5000 to $10,000. The total amount these individuals might contribute to federal candidates, parties, and other organizations increased from $25,000 to…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consider the reasons of the strength of the two party system and how insignificant third parties are…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | |dominant parties, the Democrats and the republicans, which compete against each other and win almost all the votes between |…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campaign finance reform is the issue of our lifetime. While we may point to climate change, gun control, economic inequality, the underlying problem is the influence of money in politics. Our representatives are focused on winning elections, instead of addressing constituent concerns. They have to specifically focus on spending the majority of their working time calling donors, and raising money for their campaigns, that this puts their real job on hold. Time spent calling people and asking for donations is estimated to be around ⅓ to ½ of their work day. Just this fact itself proves that the insane influence of money in politics is detrimental to democracy and disallows politicians to focus on what really matters: the voices…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epa Essay

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    In any given year their budget changes, but this year they are estimated to have a budget of 8.5 Billion dollars to…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of 2014 they have recorded over 2 trillion dollars that has costed taxpayers. Each recipient a year…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From issues concerning national security to those encompassing tax reform, the two parties can find considerable commonalities. It is indubitable that there are various topics that induce debates and arguments between Democrats and Republicans due to their differing ideologies; some of these include the necessity of climate change funding, as well as the legality of abortions. Though an exceedingly high number of differences is prominent, it is essential for each party to ultimately accept that it is possible to reconcile in spite of these contrasting ideals, and this will ensure that United States citizens can be peacefully guided by these political…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Point Shaving

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unfortunately there is the big issue of the politicians and their campaigning for funds and it's going to be hard to control…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays