Preview

Arguments Against Campaign Finance Reform

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Campaign Finance Reform
Ksenia Novikova Campaign finance reform is the issue of our lifetime. While we may point to climate change, gun control, economic inequality, the underlying problem is the influence of money in politics. Our representatives are focused on winning elections, instead of addressing constituent concerns. They have to specifically focus on spending the majority of their working time calling donors, and raising money for their campaigns, that this puts their real job on hold. Time spent calling people and asking for donations is estimated to be around ⅓ to ½ of their work day. Just this fact itself proves that the insane influence of money in politics is detrimental to democracy and disallows politicians to focus on what really matters: the voices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the end, Alex Bumberg asks Russ Feingold why no one is pushing for a change in the system. His response, though it could be described as disheartening, is something that I can understand. “It’s the system, and it’s the water in which we swim…[they] were elected under the system...It’s hard to get people to change something after they win that way.” It is crushing to think that Congress could be so corrupt. But any system can be difficult to challenge, especially when it benefits so many people with so much influence. Bumberg points out how many of the politicians and lobbyists they spoke to hate the mess that is political fundraising. I honestly don’t think I understand the system well enough to fully appreciate that these individuals who…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many attempts to reform the campaign finance since the 19th Century and before the reform was introduced, there were concerns over the amount of money being spent by individual candidates in the run up to an election and the actual presidential elections. In 1974, under President Ford, the Congress passed significant amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act creating a way to regulate campaign contributions and spending.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Setting a regulation to funnel the wealthy elite’s money into super PACs takes away power from the everyday individual and their right to have a government by the people for the people. Also, it perpetuates corruption due to the super PACs not being legally obligated to disclose their spending, which is known as “dark money”. This continues the cycle of corruption by decreasing transparency of a candidate, making the candidate and their interests less known to the public. Due to this, he public is unable to make informed decisions to better not only their own lives, but the entire country through their vote (Levy 1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When things don’t work the way they should, people start to worry. They know that they need something to change. This is what Fiorina explains in chapter The Rise of The Washington Establishment about voting. The main focus of this chapter is the issues of self interest related to government and its congressmen, bureaucrats, and voters.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main question is that since the lobbyists represent a big part of the public voice, which may have not been recognized if the lobbyists weren’t there, do we still restrict the lobbyists or do we still have democracy left in this country? The answer…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the biggest problems in this country is the corruption that plagues are politicians. If we the people elect a politician it should be the people that the politician listens to. The United States is ridiculously rich, yet nothing ever seems to get done around here. Our military budget for this year is almost 800 billion dollars. Yet the cost to end world hunger is only…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Political process in today’s presidential race deals primarily with money spent rather than votes earned. Due to delegate rule on our voting system and corruption brought about by money funded corporations and media, candidates promises are more discriminatory than for the people.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is said that the huge significance of money compromises America’s democracy. This is why spending limits have been introduced. In the aftermath of the crooked Watergate scandal, anxiety over campaign finance led to the passage of two major reform bills—the Revenue Act of 1971 and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974—that…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the course of centuries, the United States of America has had many different Presidents, senators, and other government officials. Though no two government officials are alike, one similarity that many of them have is wealth. Typically, one must run a campaign and convince the public that they are fit to rule in order to be appointed to a position of power in government. These campaigns often require a large amount of money, that is covered by donations, sponsors, or personal income. Often times, donations and great ideas are not enough to win a political campaign, and sponsors or personal income are needed. Candidates capable of funding their own campaigns are typically millionaires or even billionaires. In order to have a good chance…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Campaign related spending has increased dramatically over time. Even though the Supreme Court has ruled that campaign spending (not donations) by candidates and private individuals / groups is a form of free speech, some feel that there is just too much money in our election system. What do you think? Is campaign spending problematic? In what way(s) is it, or is it not, problematic exactly? Please explain your answer and provide evidence…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    democracy, however, corruption and extreme competitive advantage with relations to campaign funding are extremely prevalent as well. Which brings up the second step in my plan: to clean up the presidential campaigns by limiting the funds awarded to each running candidate by using clean elections. When it comes to running a campaign in the United States presidential elections, money is one of the major factors. With political campaigns being expensive candidates cannot always fund their campaign by themselves. Therefore, candidates reach out to donors for money to fund their campaigns. These donors influence the results of the elections substantially and can have a significant impact on who wins the election. The solution to this problem would be to switch over to a clean election system. The idea of clean elections involves public funding to candidates, meaning that each candidate would get a set amount of money to run his or her campaign. Clean elections would not only level the playing field between all candidates running in an election, but it would also reduce corruption within the U.S. democracy by cutting out the big corporations paying for the candidate that best benefits them. With less corruption and equal playing fields, this could also create an opportunity for a third-party candidate to claim a win in an…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regulate Political Speech

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As PACs are burdensome and expensive to administer they reduce the quantity of speech, for the quantity of speech is limited by financial resources available for the expression of political ideas. Consequently, expenditure restrictions function as a barrier to corporate speech and thereby prevent corporate voices from reaching the public and advising voters and deprive the public of its right to decide which speech and speakers are worthy of consideration. Therefore, restrictions on corporate expenditures also restrict political speech itself. Such restrictions can only be justified if they further a compelling interest and are narrowly tailored to achieve this…

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss what interest groups are and the role that interest groups play in American politics and why it is important. Another thing that this paper will discuss is how interest groups have influenced American elections. American elections have been influenced with direct and indirect strategies to get a candidate elected. They have also been influenced wit the use of information. The direct strategies used where more in your face and out for everyone else to know about and where very effective. While the indirect strategies used may have been hidden and in the shadows they were also effective. The use of information was helpful to put things out into the world and it was also there to help the candidate that was being supported by the interest group gain popularity and/or publicity. Towards the end of the paper the role of interest groups and how they have influenced American elections should be understood.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays