Preview

Mock Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mock Trial
Mock Trial was a great experience for me since it was my first time doing it in my life. My role was an officer called, Officer Low. Officer Low has been on the local police force for eight and a half years. I think my role was not easy because I had to memorize all my lines in order to answer the lawyer’s question. Also, I had to know where the offender Wally Brogue was standing and where the radio, beer and marijuana were on the diagram of David Benning’s and Sara Volsky’s apartment. Plus, I had to be careful and think a lot before I answered the lawyers question because any mistake is a problem. I realized that the lawyers are picky and tricky. For instance, when I told Mr. Allen that the .06 alcohol in his blood is above the limit, he told me it was.08 and back then it was .08 but now it is .05. Therefore, I mistaken and I felt really ashamed because I should know that since I’m an officer. Also, when Mr. Allen asked to question me on the second day of the trail, he started saying, “Yesterday you did not say that Sandra Volsky’s told you that that the assailant might be still in the building.” I am sure I did. However, I did enjoy my role because I always wanted to witness something since I was young. I feel like when I witness an offender I help the court identify if the person is guilty or not. When the lawyers interviewed me, I was told to not mention few things unless the other lawyers ask about it. Also, the crown lawyers warned me to not lie and to be honest and just answer the question without giving much detail because they wanted to use a things to argue it lot of .I thought Sandra Volsky did will on her role because she gave right evidences and she tried to proof that Brogue killed David. She also seemed sad about her boyfriend’s death and looked innocent. Wally Brogue did a good job offending himself and I liked his enthusiasm during the trial. For example, Wally was laughing and said to the lawyer twice, “Do you think I read people’s mind?”
The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This paper going to be coving the materials we went over in the You make the Call: Discretion in Criminal Justice Courtroom Workgroup simulation. You are the new assistance prosecutor for the DA Office. You are faced with problem solving and what action are taking to the choices you make in your new position as the assistance prosecutor. In this paper it will describe the problem you faced in the simulation. Also this paper will explain the approaches used for resolving the problem. Last it will discuss how critical or creative thinking skills were used or not used in the simulation.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Minnoesota V. Ronald Riff

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this case, the prosecuting attorney are to communications orally and also in writing. The prosecutor main goal is to prove to both the judge and jury that the defendant is in guilty. The prosecutor opening the statement of Riff did knowingly commit the crime of breaking, and burglary on September 30, 2011 between 12:10am and 12:20 am orally to the judge and jury. The incident located at the Marquette’s Market on 1234 Main St. Midtown, Minnesota 44333, which the owner of the market is known as Speedy Marquette. It the prosecutor choice to share his/her witnesses including all evidence with the defense attorney before trail begins and to present evidence against the defendant to both jury and the judge. “All witnesses in this case include: Otis Ripple, Soapy Water, Marty Martini, C. Sharp, Betty Bitty, Rusty Fender, Guido Concertino, and the arresting officer are orally examined by the prosecution, and then the defense.” (Curran, P. & Strauch, G.). When prosecutor finish presented their parts, then it’s a choice for the defense to present their part of evidence. The prosecutor has choices of whether to examine all the defense witnesses to set straight all their statements, and to make sure that the defense is being guilty. The defendant witnesses include: Red Chips, Ace Harte, Jacques, Orbedder, Vibes Blare, Sally Slick, Matilda Slick and Gigi Gig have all been questioned by their defense attorney. Now that the defense has finish point out their statement and all of the witness are being examined and crossed, and all evidence has been presented both orally and in…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the prosecution holds the burden of proof, they go first. When the prosecution examines a witness, they ask a chain of questions that that emphasize the elements of the crime and establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt. For the Sandoval case, their goals were to prove that he went back to the scene of the crime with intent to harm or kill, that he was capable of killing and that he did kill the victim. When Sandoval did take the stand, he was forced to answer questions that showed that he had no real reason to go back unless it was motivated through revenge and gave reasons why he would want to get revenge. I think a really effective witness was the paramedic that treated the victim. I thought it was a nice use of the witness because he mentioned details on the stabbing which brought to light that the victim appeared to have more offensive wounds. A strong point was made when the prosecutor mentioned that if it were a self-defense altercation then the victim would most likely have slash-like wounds instead of stab-like wounds. By far I think the worst witness for the prosecution would have been Officer Gassman. He did not submit adequate reports which I believe had a significant impact on the case. With respect to the prosecutions examinations, the defense got to cross-examine the witnesses. His goal was to show that the…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I reported “Alright lets just see what the jury thinks about that! Because all your evidence is false!” It got real quiet. Nobody moved a muscle. That was until we all heard a loud bam!…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12. Do you not agree that if you have suspicion that your own child is doing steroid or any other drug use they should be taken to a doctor?…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Players

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the United States criminal justice system, a courtroom work group is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This is a foundational concept in the academic discipline of the criminal justice system. Everyone in the courtroom group tries to get along. Often they act as if they are good friends. Although the members of the court group are against each other, at the end of the day justice is being served in the courtroom regardless of the gender, race, or national origin. The role of the prosecutor is to represent the government and prove the defendant is guilty of the crime. Prosecutors participate in, jury selection; opening statements, direct examination, cross-examination, and closing arguments. The prosecutor also makes sure that the jurors can be fair as well. Prosecutors are able to determine which cases to work by confirming if perhaps the case has merit, and sufficient evidence to purse a conviction. If the criteria for taking a case were more or less stringent, it would make the police officers job a lot harder by having to go more in depth then what they have to go through nowadays, and this is due to the prosecutor having to prove even more evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Nonetheless, if the criteria for taking of a case were less stringent I think that the officers and the prosecutors jobs would be too easy to prove if someone is guilty, and it would not give a defendant a fair trail. Perhaps the change that I would make to the courtroom work group would be that, many people believe that the courtroom work group should consider adding more security. Though out the years several cases…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the major differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and reality is how the trial process is portrayed. In reality, trials are not fast-paced, exciting procedures. They are long and boring procedures. Attorneys debate for hours, present their evidence, and ask questions that only make sense to the judge or other attorneys. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to testify. It is very rare that anything exciting actually happens. Trials portrayed in movies such as A Time to Kill or Runaway Jury, have us believe that shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes. They misrepresent reality by showing crafty defense attorneys suddenly calling a witness or presenting evidence that instantly…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Narrative

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    I walked down the middle isle, acting scared. I felt the cold metal on my wrist but i wasn't worried. Not even the tight grip of the burly police officers could shake me. They were missing something, the hard evidence. There was no murder weapon, no witnesses, no fingerprints, nothing of mine. In fact i wouldn't of been there if it wasn't for my past of crime. The trial started, and they brought up evidence, where I lived, the half right motive, my past crimes, but they didn't have solid evidence. I watched my defendant stand up and point this out, along with my simple alibi and how my past shouldn't affect the decision of the jury. The jury took longer than i thought to decide, which worried me a little, but the final verdict was not…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Having a Jury Trial is known to be a part of the Adversarial System. Which is when exhibits, evidence, and witnesses are assembled by representatives of one side or the other to convince the fact finder that their side’s viewpoint is the truer one. Contrasted to that approach is the inquisitorial approach, used in mostly Europe. In this approach the Judge is given more control over the proceedings. The judge will interrogate the disputing parties and witnesses, referring frequently to a dossier that the court prepared. The Jury Trial is held to get a less biased decision and also a more truthful one. A trial gives attorneys more motivation to present the jury with all the evidence of the case, with a final goal of the jury ultimately…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Observation Paper

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I went to the court on October 13, around 10:30. When I first walked in there were a lot of people there I wasn’t expecting that at all. Security was higher than at the magistrate court. There were attorneys there but they stand next to there defendants at all times since it was still assembly justice so the trials didn’t go on for days if the most for about 30 minutes. The first case I had a chance was already on its way so I don’t know how long it had been going on for. The defendant was wearing a dark blue jump suit. As well as he had some chains aournd his waist and hand handcuff. The defendants name was victor. The thing that I found different was that he was a juvinilla and the trial was still open to the public which was not normal ive been told that in all cases minor cases aren’t open to the public.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving details when answering a question is also important because that lets the jury know that you are paying attention. Lawyers are known to ask multiple questions right after another, but before giving any answers you must think about what you are going to answer. Make sure that you are aware of what your answer will be. Be confident in what you are…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay will discuss the differences in the ‘real’ courtroom, versus the ‘fictional’ courtroom, which is the depiction most of us are exposed to. In order to accurately compare the differences between the two different courtrooms, a brief summary of each must be presented. Once each of these is portrayed, an attempt to compare and contrast the two styles and the differences that exist between them can be discussed.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The other officer pulls out his handcuffs, reads my last rights, and put the handcuffs on. I blocked all of the noise out of my head. I knew the drill I have been arrested a few times before. I was a little sad that did not finish my task on Tracy, and I was not ready to stop murdering yet. I was caught because I made an unlucky mistake, not because my cleverness ran out. I was a failure in life, and as a serial killer. I felt humiliated.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays