Preview

Milgrams Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgrams Experiment
Milgram’s experiment was performed in different countries to make sure that this discovery was not just relevant in Americans. Australia’s obedience level was about 68%; Jordan’s was about 63%; and Germany hit the highest level with 85% obedience.
Milgram moved the experiment off Yale grounds and changed it so that person giving the demands was switched with a random citizen, not a scientist.. The obedience level dropped to 20% at that point as the teachers didn’t feel such a draw to obey. When Milgram twisted it so that the teacher’ had to actually touch the student to administer the “shock”, obedience levels dropped rapidly and so did the amount of people who gave the highest level shock.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparison Of Not To Obey And Milgram's Experiment
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparison Of Not To Obey And Milgram's Experiment

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Summary
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Perils Of Obedience Stanley Milgram Summary

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ian Parker's Obedience Chapter Summary
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ian Parker's Obedience Chapter Summary

    Before Milgram could publish his first book about his obedience experiment it found its way onto many medias from the New York Times, Life, ABC television, and the British Press. As the experiment became more celebrated one question continued to come up ‘had Milgram mistreated his subjects?’ Some psychologists, including Alan Elms and Bruno Bettelheim, think so after some of Milgrams subjects talked about having heart attacks and others talked about joining group therapy after the experiment. Since those reports came about the experiment has been attacked by psychologists and many others. “In Milgrams defiance,” says Parker, “Milgram would always highlight the results of post-experimental studies which never showed any traumatic…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment
    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment
    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience And Ian Parker
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience And Ian Parker

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to Authority. Predictions and Variations Conclusion.
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to Authority. Predictions and Variations Conclusion.

    Milgram on Milgram: Part 1 (Obedience experiments) (2010) (video), DSE141 Discovering psychology, Milton Keynes, The Open University.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    draft5 1

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments
    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary of the Perils of Obedience
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of the Perils of Obedience

    The second set of experiments included professionals, white collar workers, unemployed persons, and industrial workers. Although Milgram’s colleague asserted the outcome would be different when performed with “ordinary” subjects, the outcome was very much the same. The experiments were also conducted in other countries around the world and scientists found that the level of obedience was actually somewhat higher. (para. 28)…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Experiment
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Experiment

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgrams research into obedience.
    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Milgrams research into obedience.

    Stanley Milgram (1963) explains why 65% of the people did something they felt was morally wrong, that is they went into an agentic state and exhibited some aspects of denial in order to avoid moral strain. However, Milgram does not explain why 65% did not obey. In other words, it does not explain individual differences as the volunteers in Milgrams experiment seemed to resist the pressure and Milgram does not explain that.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram Experiment

    What are the limits of the government, which the majority cannot override? Does the government have the right to conscript its citizens and send them off to war? This raises the question of consent. Do we own ourselves? Does conscription violate the right of self possession? Mr. Sandel goes into great detail about Locks Government by Consent. The question of conscription or a draft by the military, is this action morally or ethically correct?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics