Preview

draft5 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
draft5 1
Many people argue that human are naturally cruel while some say no one is born with cruelty in them. After reading “The Perils of Obedience”, The Kitty Genovese Case”, and Darley and Latane’s experiments, I realized that humans acts based upon the situation and people around them in a case of emergency. Humans sometimes get confused on whether they should care about the crises or others will take care of it.
“The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition. The subjects in this experiment were not aware of what Milgram is testing them for. Each participants had different reaction to leaners’ pled. Fred Prozi began the experiment calmly but becomes increasingly tense as the experiment proceeds. He was shaking his head saying “who is going to take the responsibility if anything happens to that gentleman?”(Milgram 4). Prozi was fearing the responsibility of something happening to the learner. Inside him, he did not wanted to hurt the learner. He was afraid of declining to keep the experiment going on because he was expected to continuo by the experimenter. A medical technician named Gretchen Brandt, refused to go any further after 210 volts. She said that she was there on her own free will also didn't want to take the responsibility. She was being who she was in reality and was brave enough to decline the process no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Draft Scaffold 5

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    'A most lamentable man', written by Christine Marlowe, strongly states that Friar Laurance is not the cause of Romeo and Juliet's death but fate is.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every human has a unique and complex thought processing system in which it is nearly impossible to determine how each person will react in a given situation. At an early age, people are taught to be obedient and oftentimes are forced to make a decision between being obedient or following their own morals. Usually, obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors, Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that, humans, as a whole, will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation, rather than their personality.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "The Perils of Obedience" was written by Stanley Milgram in 1974. In the essay he describes his experiments on obedience to authority. I feel as though this is a great psychology essay and will be used in psychology 101 classes for generations to come. The essay describes how people are willing to do almost anything that they are told no matter how immoral the action is or how much pain it may cause.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 16 Psychology

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    23. What is obedience? What was Stanley Milgram’s experiment? What are factors that affected the level of obedience in the individuals he studied?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indecisive disobedience occurs when the individuals in the experiment try to disobey in different ways, but they were ineffective at it. I believe that the Milgram experiment was more about indecisive disobedience, rather than destructive obedience. The subjects of Milgram’s experiment were consciously aware that what they were doing was wrong, since it brought great pain to the “learner,” but because they were instructed by a legitimate authority to continue the experience, they obeyed the experimenter. Another factor was that the experimenter did not show any concern towards the learner nor did they show emotions when the learner screamed and pleaded to end the pain. However, the subjects did experience agony and guilt as well when they were forced to continue generating the shocks to the…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Draft

    • 1565 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As a diamond jewelry manufacturer, the biggest hurdle facing KSJ is to keep up with fast changes that influence the jewelry market. People’s needs and tastes change constantly and the key to a successful jewelry business is to keep pace with it. As quality and choices increase, so does the effort to attract consumer increase. Today the…

    • 1565 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philippines is now facing many problems and one of these are “WASTES”. There are two kinds of wastes the “NON-BIODEGRADABLE”(Di-Nabubulok) and “BIODEGRADABLE” (Nabubulok) but what if it’s mixed with each other? Would there be a new problem or is there people be affected? Or it is harmless to all of us?…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays