Provide a brief description of the study in your own words (this should be no more than 350 words). Milgram started his obedience study experiments in 1961.He was highly influenced by the defense of criminal Adolph Eichmann used second world war that he was simply following instruction when he ordered death of millions of jews. He carried out his experiment in Yale University to check whether people obey the orders of authority figure to cause pain to a stranger. The participants of this experiment were recruited through newspaper ads and each person was paid for their participation. Milgram stated that the experiment was subjected to study the punishment on learning. The teacher was asked to administrate the electric shocks of increasing voltage to learner for every wrong answer he made in word-memory experiment. A fake lottery was conducted to select the learner and teacher. But participants are always asked to take the role of teacher and learner was a confederate who was pretending to be shocked. Milgram developed intimidating shock equipment with shock levels starting from 30 volts to 450 volts. Some switches were named us “slight shock”, ”moderate shock” and “Danger- severe shock”. As the experiment progressed , the "learner" would begin to grunt at 75 volts; complain at 120 volts; ask to be released at 150 volts; and let out screams at 285 volts. Eventually, the learner was to yell loudly and complain of heart pain. At some point the actor would refuse to answer any more questions. Finally, at 330 volts the actor would be totally silent-that is, if any of the teacher participants got so far without rebelling. Teachers were instructed to treat silence as an incorrect answer and apply the next shock to the student. If at any point the teacher hesitated to inflict the shocks, the experimenter would pressure him to proceed. Almost all participants showed some distress or fear about the health of learner but they continue to give shock till the end. Contrary to expectations participants continued to give ‘shocks’ to the maximum 450 volts, in spite of protest from the Learner. |
Give five strengths of the study and five weaknesses of the study based on the evidence Strengths of study | Limitations/weaknesses of study | Strong control. | Ethical issue | High experimental realism. | “Freedom of withdraw” is violated at some points when participants where told “you must carry on”. | Study clear and findings reported appropriately | Lack of informed consent. | Volunteered participants. | Unrepresentative sample. | Replicable & further variations were possible | Not ecologically valid. |
Discuss the ethics of the study such as consent, right to withdraw, deception, debrief or other issues The criticism of Milgram study is on its ethical grounds. In this study, Milgram didn’t explained the details of the experiment to participants and they were not aware of the electric shock was unreal. But Milgram had the presumptive consent from the participants. There was a high level of deception but this was inevitable for the validity of the experiment. Milgram gave the withdrawal right to his participants but at certain level of experiment the participants were strongly encouraged to carry on with the experiment. Debriefing was done after each session in order to ensure they are in safe mental state because the experiment was highly stressful to participants and involved a lot of deception. |
Provide two other studies in the last 10 years that have looked at these concepts. Provide the reference and link Slater M, Antley A, Davison A, Swapp D, Guger C, et al. (2006) A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments. PLoS ONE 1(1): e39. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039 Dambrun, M., & Vatiné, E. (2009). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 760-773. | Provide examples of how these concepts could be either applied in a real world issue or can help explain an issue. (this should be at least 200 words but no more than 350) Stanely Milgram obedience study make a lot of controversy but by his study made a shocking result to the society. Based on the Milgram obedience observation a study was done by Eugon Tarnov in 2000 about “TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE THE CAPTAIN ERRORS”.685A number of flight accidents are taking place because the first officer failed to correct the orders of captain in the cokepit. There are four milgram findings that can explain the lack of monitoring and challenging in the airplane cokepit. Excessive obedience, hesitant challenging, lack of monitoring and physical closeness of authority towards the participant are the four factors. When the study make a correspondence between Milgram experiment setting and the cokepit , the experimenter become the erroneous captain and the participant is first officer. Observation made on this setting reveals that always first officer –captain relationship is authoritarian. And in many situations the error done by the captain are not questioned by the first officer because of hesitant challenging. By the help of voice recording device they studied the conversation between captain and first officer. And later found out their hypothesis was true in many accidents. This study is a perfect example of applying Milgram`s obedience study in a real world issue. |
Reference
Eugon Tarnov,(2000).Towards the zero accidental goal : Assisting the first monitor and challenge the captain errors.volume 10,No:1:Journal of aviation/aerospace education and research.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The experimenter, teacher, and the learner were all in the same room, the learner would be strapped to a chair. The experimenter explains to the learner that “[h]e will be read lists of simple word pairs, and that he will be tested on his ability to remember the second word of a pair when he hears the first one again,” the experimenter also advises the learner that “[w]henever he makes an error, he (learner) will receive electric shocks of increasing intensity” (632); the intensity of the shocks ranged from slight shock to a severe shock. After the teacher read out loud the simple pairs or words, the experimenter would read out the first word of the pair, and the learner would attempt to answer with the second word of the pair. The teacher participated in the experiment not knowing that learner was an actor and that the learner was not receiving any electric shocks. Stanley Milgram explains that“[t]he point of the experiment is to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measureable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (632). Milgram found that participants were more than willing to go pass what was comfortable to them to please authority; “Milgram found that few participants could…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Before Milgram could publish his first book about his obedience experiment it found its way onto many medias from the New York Times, Life, ABC television, and the British Press. As the experiment became more celebrated one question continued to come up ‘had Milgram mistreated his subjects?’ Some psychologists, including Alan Elms and Bruno Bettelheim, think so after some of Milgrams subjects talked about having heart attacks and others talked about joining group therapy after the experiment. Since those reports came about the experiment has been attacked by psychologists and many others. “In Milgrams defiance,” says Parker, “Milgram would always highlight the results of post-experimental studies which never showed any traumatic…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Does the study have scientific merit? How ill society or the subjects of the study benefit?…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…
- 128 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…
- 225 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Describe the research and include all details on how the study was conducted. Identify subsections: participants, measures and procedure. Each section should be labeled…
- 602 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…
- 156 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
“The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…
- 1345 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…
- 799 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Milgram’s findings, as read in the article “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You?”, apply to the first case of a manager and her fiancé ordering a teenage girl to strip and her following their commands. Milgram’s data suggested that humans are obedient even to the extent of blindly following authority. His findings were demonstrated by his experimental subjects who continued to increase the voltage to electrocute the learner, despite the subject’s moral code conflicting with the idea of…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…
- 1558 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Milgram after advertising for volunteer participants were paid on arrival at the laboratory for their time. Participants, believing they were taking part in a memory experiment, were introduced in pairs to the experimenter where they ‘decided’ who was to be either a ‘teacher’ or a ‘learner’. In reality one of the ‘pairs’ of participants was a confederate and the chances were rigged so that the real participant was always the ‘teacher’. The experimenter explained that the ‘teacher’ would test the ‘learner’s’ memory, and when the ‘learner’ answered incorrectly would be asked to give him an electric shock. The ‘learner’ (who was the confederate) was strapped into a chair and wired up to the electric shock generator. So that the ‘teacher’ (the real participant) believed the electric shock generator was real, he was given a 45 volt electric shock. The electric shock generator had a row of switches marked from 15 to 450 volts in 15 volt increments with adjectives describing how severe the shock was, and 435 and 450 volts were labelled “XXX”.…
- 808 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Prior to the experiments, Milgram sought predictions about the outcome from psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in behavioral sciences. All thought the teachers would refuse to obey the experimenter. The majority of the teachers would show concern once the learners began showing signs of discomfort. However, 60 percent of them followed the orders until the end, administering shocks to the learner up to 450 volts. (para. 27) The findings were dismissed as having no relevance to “ordinary” people considering the subjects used were students of Yale. Colleagues of Milgram claimed that these students were highly aggressive and competitive when provoked. (para. 27)…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…
- 743 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays