Preview

Microbiology Labs

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Microbiology Labs
MBK Lab 01 – Lab Report Name: ____________________ Section: ___________________

EXPERIMENT 1
TITLE: Observing Bacteria and Blood

OBJECTIVE: To gain functional knowledge of microscope operations through practical applications of a microscope in the observation of bacteria and blood.

PROCEDURES: Using the microscope, an oil immersion lens and observing Bacteria Cultures in Yogurt . Preparing a Blood Slide and observing Blood:

After reviewing the section of the manual as instructed I cleaned the ocular lenses and prepared the slides. I made required adjustments to the microscope and ocular distances for view during experiment. I practiced using six prepared slides that were in the kit to ensure I was viewing the slides accordingly. I placed a drop of oil onto the slide and rotated it until bringing it to fine focus on the microscope. I then observed the same slides in part 1 but I added the oil immersion to view the differences. The difference was in the magnification and the ability to see more of the substances in finer view. I then made my own sample of yogurt, I left it undisturbed for 24 hours and observed it under the microscope. The sample was not was the right consistency. I viewed the specimen under the microscope. I pricked my finger with the sterilized pin and placed my blood on a slide with a slip cover. I observed the specimen under the microscope. I placed the prepared slide with my blood on the microscope stage, and brought it into focus on low power. I saw a lot of tiny particles that appeared to be blood cells through the microscope.

QUESTIONS:
Compare your observations from the fresh yogurt slide and the prepared yogurt slide. Are there differences? Why or why not? The fresh yogurt appeared to have less growth than the prepared slide of yogurt. This is because the prepared yogurt was no longer gestating and showed an increase in bacterial numbers.
Were you able to identify specific bacterial morphologies? Which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King B Agar Lab Report

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Agar and Media Preparation— Agar plates containing King’s B Agar were often used throughout the experiment to support growth of Pseduomonas fluorescens. A recipe was used that included a mixture of 10g Proteose Peptone #3, 1.5g Potassium Phosphate Dibasic (K2HPO4), 30ml 50% Glycerol, ~965ml water and 20g agar. The mixture, post- autoclave, was left to cool and 5ml 1M Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) was added and created about 40 plates. King’s B Medium was made using the same procedure as the King’s B Agar with the exception of adding 20g of agar. These recipes were referred to later in the protocol to create additional plates and liquid cultures when growing multiple strains.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Were there observable differences between your fresh yogurt slide and the prepared yogurt slide? If so, describe them.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Air: I left the dish uncovered in my kitchen and the growth was interesting. I noticed that there were three distinct microbial growths that were prominent along with a small smattering of white along the petri dish. There was one growth that was a dark grey colour with a mottled appearance, another that was a white colour with a mottled appearance, and finally one that was a tan colour with a bubbly appearance.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab 1 Microscope

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    D. Were there observable differences between your fresh yogurt slide and the prepared yogurt slide? If so, describe them. The prepared yogurt slide was purple spheres and commas covering the whole slide.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Microbio lab report body

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Microorganisms, which are organisms that can be seen only with the use of a microscope, are both important and hazardous to human life. In the medical field, it is of utmost importance to be able to identify these organisms because they help to determine the cause of an illness and the consequent treatment needed (Slonczewski, 2013). The purpose of experiment #14 is to identify each bacteria in an unknown mixture, using a number of laboratory tests. Over the semester, multiple tests were carried out to identify between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria including the Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) media test, which selects only for gram positive bacteria, and the use of Eosin Methylene Blue Levine (EMB) Agar media, which selects for gram negative bacteria and differentiates between lactose fermenters (paracolons) and non-lactose fermenters (coliforms).These tests along with other selective and/or differential media, and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lab 1

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I prepared a teaspoon of yogurt in a cup and placed it inside my closet for 12 to24 hours. Then I viewed the prepared yogurt slide.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The control plates used in transformation are the LB and second LB/Amp plates marked with a “-“. The control for restriction digest was the ladder. The independent variables are the different cultures of the E. coli, and the +LB/Amp and +LB/Amp/ara plates form the experiment group. The dependent variable is whether the cells glow green under the UV light and whether they are resistant to ampicillin or not. The variables in restriction digest are the other 4 samples. The dependent variable is the length that the DNA fragments travel while the independent variable is the size of the DNA fragments.…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since microorganisms are not visible to the eye, the essential tool in microbiology is the microscope. One of the first to use a microscope to observe microorganisms was Robert Hooke, the English biologist who observed algae and fungi in the 1660s. In the 1670s, “Anton van Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch merchant, constructed a number of simple microscopes and observed details of numerous forms of protozoa, fungi, and bacteria” (Introduction to Microscopes, n.d.). During the 1700s, microscopes were used to further explore on the microbial world, and by the late 1800s, the light microscope had been developed. “The electron microscope was developed in the 1940s, thus making the viruses and the smallest bacteria (for example, Rickettsiae and Chlamydia) visible” (Introduction to Microscopes, n.d.). The studies of microorganisms were now possible thanks to these two powerful tools the light and electron microscopes. The time from the development of the light microscope to the electron microscope was more than a century apart thus giving us our two first branches of microscopes and a new way to explore what the unaided eye could not.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bio Lab 1

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Based on the information in Table 2, (in the lab manual) what patterns do you observe?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Based on the results, the bunchberry plant, with a scientific name of Cornus canadensis, was most frequently seen in station four, the ecotone, and second most in station five, the forest which is most likely in the lower forest since it has a similar environment to that of station four, and third most in station three, the bog. It was not as frequently seen in areas of higher elevation such as the old field. It should be noted that all three locations were very moist which is expected since they receive water from the marsh. Due to its more frequent presence in moist environments, it is predicted that the bunchberry is more adapted to such locations. It is also predicted that sandy soil supports its growth since it was mostly seen in stations four and five which have sandy soil. Within and on the soil, lots of wood could be seen on the ground from remains of trees that were around the bunchberries which lead to a possibility that as the wood remains are buried in the soil, the bunchberry plant is able to use it to build roots.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    with soap and then rinse the container several times to remove the soap. Place a teaspoon of yogurt in the container. Cover the container and place it in a dark, warm area. Leave the container for 12–24 hours. Take a sample of yogurt from the container and place the sample on a clean slide. Observe the bacteria under the microscope at 10x, 40x, and 100x oil immersion. Setting should be low. Compare your observations of the fresh, live slide to the prepared, stained slide.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which adjustment, course or fine, do you use when you are observing the highest power?…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. 10 sympatric and 8 allopatric in North and South Carolina. 14 sympatric and 10 allopatric in Arizona.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biology Lab

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The dental formula is a convention used by mammalogists to determine the tooth number and tooth arrangements. The dental formula is calculated by counting the number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars present in the upper jaw (one side) and counting the number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars in the lower jaw (one side). The total number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars (upper +lower jaw) multiplied by 2 would equal to the total number of teeth present in the mammal. The dental formulas for these three species: coyote (Canis latrans), deer (Odocoileus virginanus), and human (Homo sapien) are all different. The coyote had the dental formula of 3-1-4-2/3-1-4-2 (x2), which produced the total of 40 teeth. The deer had the dental formula of 0-0-3-3/3-1-3-3 (x2), which equaled to 32 teeth. The human species had a smaller number of teeth with the dental formula being 2-1-2-2/2-1-2-2 (x2), which produced a total of 28 teeth. The numbers of molars in the coyote upper and lower jaws were the same as the number of molars in the human (upper + lower jaws). According to the dental formula data, not all skulls have the same numbers of different tooth types in the maxilla and mandible because each skull could have varied number of tooth types.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Microbiology Practical

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Differential Staining Techniques- Any Staining Technique using 2 or more stains is differential. It allows…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays