Preview

Measures Which Were Adopted By The Coming Of The Second World War 1919-1939 Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1921 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Measures Which Were Adopted By The Coming Of The Second World War 1919-1939 Analysis
The main gist of this write up comment seeks to crucially assess and scrutinize the measures which were adopted by the major powers in trying to avert the coming of the Second World War in the period 1919-1939. Rafts of several measures were adopted by the great powers to prevent another world war after the end of the First World War. However, the chief crux of this write up will critically evaluate these strategies, closely analyze strength and weaknesses of each measure and explore factual justification engulfed it. Meanwhile, punitive measures against German were staged whereby treaties such as Versailles, Neuilly, St Germaine, Lorcano, Kellogg Briand Pact, Young Plan and Dawes Plan were put in order in a bid to camouflage the emerging out …show more content…
Taylor (1964) claims that the League failed to stop Hitler and Mussolini to interfere in both internal and external wars. It must however also be noted that America refuse and withdrew from the European politics opened platform for Hitler to seek hegemony in Europe. It became “toothless bulldog” to the League because America greatly contributed for it to remain strong and stable. Thus, one might argue that structural weaknesses were responsible in the outbreak of the Second World War. Moreover, they totally failed to resolve Spanish civil war and dictators introduced new dictatorship. This is evidenced by both Hitler and Mussolini auxiliary support the Franco who the nationalists to overthrow the elected government resulting in the rise of another ruthless unrealistic dictator. Consequently, one might possibly suggest that he League totally failed to avert or prevent war in 1939 as elucidated …show more content…
Knapp (1967) argues that Germany was the only state to disarm, as Stresemann regularly pointed out but the rest shrank from being the first to reduce armaments. It must however also be noted that the army defense of Germany were to cater only of its nation internally. A typical example is the Germany army was limited to a maximum of 100 000 troops and no conscription. Carr (2002) advocates that dangerous armed heavy machinery were not allowed to be used especially by the Germans. Basically the measures were very punitive and ordeal in nature, the armed forces of Germany were forbidden to use heavy artillery tanks, capital warships, submarines and powered aircraft in a bid to prevent future wars. The allied powers nervously feared Hitler, however, Hitler walked out because he discovered that other nations put frantic efforts in striving to weaken Germany strongholds. Thus, lack of international determination, cooperation, commitment and the question of fear to Germany made this measure irrelevant and ineffective to a greater extent. Grant and Temperly (1989) reveal that the emerging out of another fortify wars among many states was inevitable at that facile period of time hence, it was quite reliable clear. They further conceptualize that Hitler rearmament clearly shows and indicates evidence of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Events Led Up To Ww2

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    • Like Britain, did not attempt to use the League of Nations in response to the…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the 28th June 1919, Germany resentfully signed the most famous treaty ever, Versailles. Although years of readjusting the treaty followed, this essay will focus mainly on the strengths and weaknesses of the 440 articles in 1919. The Treaty followed a massive war, with huge human sacrifice. It was supposed to be the Treaty to end all wars and give security to the countries involved. The overwhelming task that laid ahead for Woodrow Wilson (America), Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Orlando (Italy) was on a bigger scale than any previous delegates had had to deal with.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of Adolf Hitler (Hitler) began at 6:30 p.m. on the evening of April 20, 1889. Hitler was baptized as a Roman Catholic and had dreams of becoming a Roman Catholic Priest. As a child, Hitler became obsessed with a book on the War of 1870-1871 between the Germans and the French, convinced it had been a glorious event (The History Place, 1996). In his second year of high school, Hitler developed a passion for politics, German history…

    • 2800 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuff and things

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the 1930’s the world plunged in WW II due to many different reasons such as aggression, appeasement, and collective security. Even though the 1920’s began with a favorable outlook for peace, toward the end of the decade and throughout the 1930’s the clouds of war were forming. Dictators arose in countries that were dissatisfied with the results of WW I. These dictators will be Adolf Hitler, Emperor Hirohito, and Benito Mussolini. All of these leaders will wreak destruction on Europe and Asia and casualties will be in the ten millions. I will explain how this madness came about and what was the cause for this war.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second world war was one of truly epic proportions. Virtually every nation on earth was impacted in one way or another, whether they were directly involved, or merely suffered the negative, and inevitable, externalities that are associated with war. Although the war and its impact was significant enough to stretch world-wide, the opposing powers are generally grouped into only two separate forces – the Axis and the Allies. One, the Axis powers, consisted of nations working towards conquering, overtaking, and ransacking anything or anyone that stood in their way. The Allied nations, the “good guys,” were on the other side of the proverbial fence, bound and determined to stand up for the good of the people, and put an end to the tyrants and dictators leading the Axis powers.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement in the 1930s

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Appeasement may be regarded as a philosophy of the maintenance of peace; in political terms it refers to policy of conciliation with a potential aggressor, often with implications of sacrifice of principles (Oxford Dictionary). The policy of appeasement is one in which both Britain and France and many other nations took towards Nazi Germany and its expansionist aims during the late 1930s, it is one of the most controversial and criticized foreign policies in history (Gelernter D 2002:22). This paper argues that the appeasement policy was for most nations around the world in the 1930s a less challenging way to deal with the problem of Hitler. Nowadays it is a common view that if Britain and France would have taken a harder line against the Nazis then Hitler's aggressive policy would not have remained unchecked and German expansionism may not have endangered the anti Nazi nation states of Europe and beyond. This essay will also explore the view that appeasement was necessary for many different countries at the time, as a way of buying time for rearmament, so that they would be able to oppose militarily Nazi Germany. The appeasement policy reflected the general consensus of people who where opposed to going to war again so soon when they still were feeling the devastating effects of the World War One (WW1). In regards to whether appeasement in the 1930s was defensible we have to look at the justifications for the policy of appeasement. We ultimately have to understand if it was a bid to reach a peaceful understanding with Germany or nations looking after their own interests. An important matter to note is that the major powers were anxious to stop any German influence over Eastern Europe at any cost (Day D 2003:8-10).…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The League of Nations, which was created in 1918, was supposed to provide collective security for all members, seek peaceful solutions between conflicting nations, prevent any conflict and ultimately prevent another world war. It failed to do this. The League, which did not have a standing army, could not enforce collective security for its members or any aggressive country against its policies and its economic sanctions proved useless, while League members also valued its own national interest over the Leagues interest. As seen in war between Russia and Poland in 1920-1921, the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923 and the invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. The League was ineffective in preventing conflict and hostilities between these countries and its efforts to stop them were futile.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manchuria and Abyssinia

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Manchuria and Abyssinia were two nations conquered in the early 1930s. The invasions of these two nations destroyed the world’s belief in the ability and strength of the League of Nations. The authority of the League of Nations was lost during these two major events. This was due to the slow and poor reactions of the league in both situations. The League made inadequate decisions to suppress the attacking nations and this showed the world that the small and less powerful nations could not expect protection by the League and it also gave the aggressors and leaders the proof they needed to know there wasn’t anything standing in their way. These two major triumphs of invasion, made obvious to the world that the League was not competent in fulfilling its’ main objectives, which were to keep peace in the world by solving conflicts between nations in peaceful ways, and to prevent such invasions.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To fully understand the political actions of Britain and France during the 1930s, a concise definition of the term appeasement must first be provided. As a policy, appeasement is the act of negotion with a country deemed to be a threat to peace and stability, through the provision of limited concessions in which to satisfy its demands. In this case, it was Britain and France's belief that showing leaniance to an increasingly powerful and threatening Germany under fascist leader, Adolf Hitler, would secure eventual peace and stability within Europe. The outcome, as we know from hindsight, was unsuccessful and lead to the outbreak of war in 1939, however before it can be dismissed as a failure on behalf of Germany's rivals, futhur investigation has to be made into why it took so long for Chamberlain to abandon his policy of appeasement in the eye of the storm, and why it was carried out in the first place.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1930s there were two incidents that really tested the League of Nations; they were the invasion of Manchuria and the Abyssinia crisis. During the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the league had done a bad job by delaying to solve their own local problems- it took them a year to produce a report to condemn the Japanese in1933 (when Hitler came to power). However, Japan intended to invade more of China to ‘defend their selves’, thus the powerless League voted to approve it when only Japanese voted against as an insult. Witnessing the incident, Hitler could be almost certain that League was too useless and weak to stop his future actions. In 1936 he took a huge risk by sending German troops to remilitarise Rhineland; however he was confident due to the…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeasement policies of Britain and France brought about the outbreak of the Second World War to a small extent because the appeasement policies adopted by Britain and France, which were to avoid wars by satisfying the aggressor’s wants, was a less significant factor while comparing to the impact of the First World War, the rise of totalitarianism, the Great Depression.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hitlers Foreign Policys

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Dictatorship and Democracy In Europe 1920-1945 Key Personalities Hitler's Foreign Policy Aims ● ● ● GROSSDEUTSCHLAND: 'big Germany', unite all german speakers into 1 big country (Germany, Austria, Poland, Czechoslovakia, France) Remilitarise Rhineland LEBENSRAUM: 'living space', more territory for Germany (e.g. Poland, Russia, Czechoslovakia) ● Increase size of military, navy, air force etc...…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did disarmament fail?

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In February 1932 the long-promised Disarmament Conference finally got under way. By July 1932 it had produced resolutions to prohibit bombing of civilian populations, limit the size of artillery, limit the tonnage of tanks, and prohibit chemical warfare. But there was very little in the resolutions to show how these limits would be achieved. It was not a promising start. However, there was a bigger problem facing the Conference – what to do about Germany. The Germans had been in the League for six years. Most people now accepted that they should be treated more equally than under the Treaty of Versailles. The big question was whether everyone else should disarm to the level that Germany had been forced to, or whether the Germans should be allowed to rearm to a level closer to that of other powers.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Guilt Clause

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hitler’s rise to power, based on a political campaign that promised an improvement of the German identity, helped transform Germany into a leading economy. Soon enough, Hitler’s political authority gained enough momentum that he called for the remilitarization of Rhineland and a union with Austria, actions clearly forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles. France, Britain and the United States did not regard these actions as harmful. Catherine Cline theorizes that because not even the creators of the Treaty of Versailles found it effective, “When Hitler brutally attacked the structure of Versailles in the 1930s, few were inclined to defend what they judged to be a morally flawed system” (683). Thus, Historians argue over the importance of world intervention. It seems the conclusion dictates that had he Allied Forces intervened against Hitler’s threatening actions sooner, he would have been discouraged to make future invasions and additionally, would have lost significant political influence when the Germans realized he could not follow through on his promises of a superior Germany. Even though the world economy was improving, World War II seemed inevitable. So, the world’s fatal mistake was leaving Hitler unchecked. If Hitler had been prioritized over the world economy, historians suggest the future events could have possibly played out…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays