Preview

Effectiveness of League of Nations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
720 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effectiveness of League of Nations
Modern Essay. Assessment Task 4
Assess the effectiveness of the League of Nations to the maintenance of peace in Europe to 1939.

The League of Nations, which was created in 1918, was supposed to provide collective security for all members, seek peaceful solutions between conflicting nations, prevent any conflict and ultimately prevent another world war. It failed to do this. The League, which did not have a standing army, could not enforce collective security for its members or any aggressive country against its policies and its economic sanctions proved useless, while League members also valued its own national interest over the Leagues interest. As seen in war between Russia and Poland in 1920-1921, the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923 and the invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. The League was ineffective in preventing conflict and hostilities between these countries and its efforts to stop them were futile.

The League of Nations failed on many accounts to maintain peace in Europe, the League seemed only to back up countries within the League and would not intervene in conflicts its members were not apart of, as seen in the war between Russia and Poland from 1920 to 1921. In 1920, Poland invaded Russian land. The Polish army quickly overwhelmed the Russian army and made a swift advanced into Russia. The Russians had to sign the Treaty of Riga, which handed over nearly 80,000 square kilometers of Russian land over to Poland. The League did nothing, as Russia was seen as a ‘plague from the East’ and was feared by the Western powers such as Britain and France, some of the Leagues senior members. The war between Russia and Poland showed that the League was looking out for its own member’s interest not the good of all nations and was one of its first failures.

The League of Nations would fail to prevent hostilities in 1923 demonstrating that its rules could be broken yet again without consequence but this time by one of its senior members, France, with the aid of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ironically the League of nation’s answer for world peace was the main cause of World War II. Germany loss World War I and was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, saying that there would not be anymore wars ever. The Treaty of Versailles was created at the end of World War I in hopes to keep world peace; both the Allied Powers and the Central Powers signed the treaty and agreed to keep the peace with one another. The Treaty of Versailles was a great idea on paper, but unfortunately it helped cause World War II. The Treaty of Versailles helped cause World War II by taking land away from Germany, limiting the size of Germany’s military, pushing war reparations on Germany, and using the War Guilt Clause against the Germans.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After World War I U.S was strongly discouraged by war and absolutely sure they don’t want to be involved in any European affairs anymore. Therefore they did not ratify the Versailles treaty and did not join the League of Nation in 1920. Warren G. Harding in his speech on October 1920 claimed that “League strikes a deadly blow at our constitutional integrity and surrenders to a dangerous extent our independence of action”.1 If U.S had joined the League of Nation the country would be obligated to make things and act in a way they don’t necessarily always want to.…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    League of Nations proposed by Wilson, meant ot maintain peace in Europe and avert future wars. Unable to enforce peace in Europe…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand his army throughout Europe and eventually become supreme ruler of the world. Fortunately they defeated hitler. Other Political leaders like Benito Mussolini and Hideki Tojo fought with Hitler. The League of Nations was another political contribution to World War 2. In theory the League of Nations was a good idea and did have some early successes, but it was a failure. During the 1920’s the world was in a deep depression which lead to economy falls, reduce trading, and rise of unemployment rate. The reasons why the League of Nations was a failure during World War II is because not all countries joined, it had no power, had no army, and unable to act…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once World War I came to a close, many decided they never wanted to go through such a terrible war again. In fact, they even said that World War I was “the war to end all wars.” They wanted to bring peace throughout the nations, something that would ensure that they would never have reason to fight again, at least not nearly as bad as the Great War had been. President Woodrow Wilson was a strong supporter of a peace between all continents, even constructing a 14 Point Plan that would focus on bringing peace to the world. As a result, when the League of Nations came into being, he fully supported the Treaty of Versailles, which would not only induct the United States into the League, but also hold every single one of the signers to their promise of peace and unity. President Wilson brought this to the attention of the United States government, and though the Treaty of Versailles supported many of Wilson’s points from his 14 Point Plan, it was unsuccessful in passing. Though Wilson was very stubborn in trying to get the treaty passed, the strength of the opposing forces was too great, and Senate declined the passing of the treaty.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    League of Nations also played a huge part in starting WW2. League of nations was founded in Paris Peace Conference that finished the World War I. This league was created to bring peace to the world and solve issues by negotiation rather than using force. European countries did not join the League of Nations which was one of the mistakes that caused the war. In addition, Germany and Russia were not allowed to join the League. Germany couldn’t join because it was a punishment for starting the World War I. Soviet Union couldn’t join due to communism.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elijah of buxton

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The League of Nations was an international organization who tried to make global peace. Unfortunately they were unable to prevent the outbreak of World War II. The United Nations took its place after WW2.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coursework

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Initially, interpretation A presents the view that mutual pacts between Germany, Belgium and France helped peace in the region. These agreements would have allowed the possibility of future dealings as well as reducing post-war tensions; however, as interpretation D agrees, I believe this détente was an “illusion”. I believe the idea the agreements helped achieve stability to be unjustified, as the 1920’s show, arbitration through international organisations failed to work – especially where Eastern Europe was concerned. In 1920 Poland launched two aggressive wars against Lithuania and Russia, the 1920 Polish-Soviet war and the 1919 Polish-Lithuanian war respectively, and despite Lithuania’s appeals towards the League of Nations, no action was taken against Poland. Russia’s situation also highlights a problem with countries that were not invited to join the League, namely Russia and Germany, as they could not appeal to the League - this is supported by France’s military invasion of the Ruhr in 1923. This supports the idea that arbitration did not achieve stability in 1920; countries could make agreements without fear of retribution from the League if they broke them, and this would have furthered paranoia amongst newer and smaller states in Eastern Europe who were unable to properly defend themselves. Fear from attacks would have led to a build up in arms, armaments, and alliances as is shown with the formation of the ‘Little Entente’ between Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia in 1919 and 1920. While one could argue this would have led to stability through stability, the Genoa Conference of 1922 highlighted tensions between the countries, especially where the Soviet Union was concerned – because of its failures, I believe it served only to increase tensions in the East with the Soviet Union and Germany. This…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Woodrow Wilson

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this monograph, Woodrow Wilson greatly attempted to maintain peace before entering World War I. The reason Wilson established the League of Nations to passionately pursue this goal. Link emphasizes that the president even chased this…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the catastrophe of World War 1 the major powers, Britain, France and the United States of America did not wish to suffer any more casualties towards their country. The US who did not reside in Europe, approached this by taking on the policy of Isolationism, which lead to the major superpower in the world not participating in the regulation of countries, but the greatest mistake was made by Britain and France, as they did not have the stomach to take any action as they wished to hold onto leadership of their respective countries and they were scared of more losses. This was amplified by the ongoing struggle caused by the recent economic instability caused by the Great Depression and as such countries did not have the resources or the will to appose Germany and Hitler. This inaction lead to Germany lead by the Nazi party to break many of the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles and help build a Germany ready for war, this inability to act also lead to the main failing of the League of…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was the United States reasoning for not joining the League of Nations, they believed it would require them to deal with international problems that could cause another war (“US Isolationism 1920s”). Since the US was not a member of the League of Nations it made it more difficult for the League to handle the Ruhr Crisis. Thus the US could not be forced to handle the situation and others with less military resources made little to no impact trying to attain reparations (“American Isolationism”). The League was unable to create lasting peace without the US, the members were left to decided what they wanted to do rather than what needed to be done. There was not way to force a country to take action and there was no help available when the reparations stopped being paid and there was risk of invasion (“World War…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    aims was to prevent to outbreak of wars, improve people's lives and jobs, agree to disarmament, and enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The League hoped it could influence countries to ensure peace by international diplomacy and mediation, economic sanction, force, and moral condemnation. This seemed to work well at first; however, later, there proved to be many weaknesses contained in the Treaty. For example, the League did not have an army of its own, which means that if any of the countries ignored the Leagues decision, then the League would have no power to do anything. The main strength of the League was that it was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. Later, people started to attack the treaty; this was also a major weakness of the League. In fact, one of the most serious weaknesses was that the League had limited membership. Most of the powerful countries were not members. For instance, the US refused to join although Woodrow Wilson was the one who proposed the idea of a League. Germany was not allowed to be a member, and communist Russia resented Britain and France's membership. Another critical weakness was the decision-making process established by the League. This process involves all the members acting together in order for the League to take action. Therefore, if one member disagrees or does…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WWII Paper

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not all countries belonged to the League of Nations. Not belonging to the League of Nations resulted in not having an army, no real power, and could not act quickly. All this resulted in the failure of the League of Nations. In the 1930’s the League of Nations showed weakness and it was used against them (History on the Net, 2013). The League of Nations had two problems to deal with before the Western European troubles and it failed at both in Abyssinia and Manchuria.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tensions that started World War Two arose from the legacies brought by the end of World War One. Among others were the Terms of the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty brought the creation of the League of Nations, an organization that was established to keep peace worldwide. The League’s failures played an important role in starting World War Two . These factors stirred tensions in Europe around the 1920s and the 1930s. The Treaty of Versailles had a greater influence than the League of Nations in causing World War Two. The Treaty gave the Germans more motivation to begin the war. An examination of the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles will establish that the latter choice was indeed the factor that had greater influence in beginning the Second World War due to the fact that the Germans wanted their former territories, the League of Nations did not encourage the Germans to start the war, and the Treaty of Versailles humiliated the Germans and the Russians.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, there are other reasons to why the League of Nations was unsuccessful in dealing with disputes. One such reason is the Corfu incident in 1923. This was where some Italian soldiers employed by the Conference of Ambassadors to mark out the borders between Albania and Greece were murdered by Greek bandits. The Italian leader, Mussolini, demanded 50 million in compensation because of this. Because Mussolini demanded 50 million worth of compensation, Greece asked the League for help and to investigate. After it was brought to attention, Italy refused to adopt this and invaded Corfu. After this, the Conference of Ambassadors ordered Greece to accept Mussolini’s demands. This was a failure…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays