Preview

Mcmurphy's Perspective Shift In The Movie '

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mcmurphy's Perspective Shift In The Movie '
Daniel Pukaluk
Period 9-10
4-14-11
Perspective Writing Shift The perspective shift in the movie does alter the movie’s plot. The movie is set in McMurphy’s perspective, while in the novel, the narrator is Chief. When the reader is reading the book, they get a picture the thoughts that are running through Chief’s head. Since the audience of the movie doesn’t know what Chief is saying, they really believe that Chief is deaf and dumb, just like everyone in the ward’s been saying. One example from the movie that the reader can see that Chief is “dumb” and deaf is the basketball game. McMurphy is trying to teach Chief to play basketball and while McMurphy is speaking to him, the audience can assume that he really is deaf because Chief doesn’t
…show more content…
And during the game, Chief is walking up and down the court while everyone is running. This just helps the audience of the movie to prove that Chief is in-fact dumb because he is oblivious to everything that is happening around him. Any decently intelligent person that is in a basketball game would at least try to do whatever the other players are doing. But Chief decides to do his own thing and just walk and at times; skip up and down the court. While reading the book though, the reader notices that Chief is not deaf and dumb because he tells the reader everything that he hears. He knows exactly what’s going on around him but he just continues to act deaf and dumb because he has a slight social problem. He always wants to be in the background. The perspective shift that occurs in the movie makes it difficult for the audience to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a lesson before dying, I noticed many differences between the movie and book. In the book the superintendent went to inspect the children but in the movie the part was not shown, in the book it was Miss Emma's idea to bring the children in the day room but in the movie it was Grants idea and lastly in the movie they didn't show the several visits between Jefferson and Grant before he began to open up.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alex Rikki Tikki

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The story of Rikki Tikki-Tavi is expressed (portrayed) in two different ways, a film version and a book. The film version of Rikki Tikki-Tavi creates a better understanding of the story. The film version does not only express (depict) the story through words but also creates a visual understanding as well as using sound effects and special effects to adapt the realistic perspective. Both the book and the film used the same plot but spent a different amount of time on the explanation of the main points. (what are you trying to say)…

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blind Side

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another noticeable change in the movie verses the book was the emphasis on the different characters. The main character was indisputably Michael Oher in both the book and the movie. However, the movie put a strong emphasis on Leigh Anne Touhy (who was played by Sandra Bullock) and presented her as the second most major character aside from Michael. The book, on the other hand, had a lot more facts about Sean that the movie never presented. Leigh Anne was a key player in both, but in the movie, she seemed to be so much more of a main character that the other characters that stood out in the book did not do so in the movie. The major example of that was Sean Touhy who seemed to be the first one to invest in Michael in the book unlike the movie where he played a more quiet and uninvolved role in Michael's life. There were other subtle differences that could be noticed, like having the necessary GPA for an NCAA scholarship be 2.5 (movie) instead of 2.56 (book) which led to another problem to work around, or having Michael's fight be with the gang members in his old neighborhood (movie) instead of with one of his teammates at Ole Miss (book). Overall, however, the movie attempted to portray an accurate account of the book which made it enjoyable to read and watch both.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After watching the movie and reading the book, there are some major differences such as the character development, key roles and certain scenes, yet minor differences like objects or dialogue used in the movie than the book. These differences shown between the two indicating how the book is better developed and gives more detail than the movie, which allows the reader have a better perception of how the characters' minds work, and explaining their actions…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through his integration of flashbacks in the storyline of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Ken Kesey, the author, is able to demonstrate his criticism of society’s ignorance and its attempt to conform all of its members to the norm. In the novel, Chief Bromden recalls the first time he was ignored, causing him to lose his voice and be rendered into silence. During an encounter with some unexpected visitors in the Falls, Chief’s voice goes unheard and thinks “that they don’t look like they’d heard me talk at all” (Kesey 213). Assuming that the Chief is unable to speak or understand English, the visitors choose to ignore his attempt to be included in the conversation. Through the use of a flashback to highlight the ignorance of the…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The shifts of the points of views add depth to the novel. Without the shift of narration from chapter to chapter, the book would not contain perspective and would affect the reader…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Thomas Crown Affair

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the original, Jewison used techniques that were new to the industry at the time. He used a split screen technique to enhance the action scenes by allowing for more than one point of view, giving the movie more suspense. However, in the remake, McTiernan chose not to use this technique or even any other that is newer to film making. Mctiernan's makes it easier for the viewer to follow the plot and focus in on what is going on in the movie. In doing this, the remake loses some of the intensity in it's action and suspense…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Martin Luther King Jr, “the ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” This statement means that the best way to see that someone is a man is the way they handle themselves when they are in a problem. The critical lens is valid because this is true in life and literature. The book The Crucible by Arthur Miller and The Catcher In The Rye by J.D Salinger exemplifies the critical lens statement by Martin Luther King Jr. The literary elements that best support the interpretation is characterization and conflict.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It added possibly one or two scenes. Overall the book is better than the movie on account of of all of the little details it shows, and how well it is written. The way that S.E. Henton describes everybody just lets a reader feel as if they are in the book looking at the scenes going on. It is written so well that reader's will not be able to put the book down once they pick it up for the first time. Within sentence parts you will find that everything is grammatically correct and extremely enticing. The book will produce the reader into feeling like they want to jump into the book so they may be with the…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cuckoo's Nest Themes

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the other hand, “Hollywood” always has those things in mind, and this is most likely why Chief was replaced by McMurphy. The “Hollywood” assessment of Kesey’s novel must’ve been less Oscars had the movie been narrated by a “deaf and dumb” Indian. Nonetheless, the film is magnificent (when not critiquing its relation to the novel) and it does manage to capture at least one of Kesey’s themes. Choosing McMurphy as the main focus in the movie placed an even greater emphasis on Kesey’s initial theme of rebellion against authority and conformity. In fact McMurphy is portrayed as even more insubordinate in the film. This is shown in scenes that vary from the novel, such as when McMurphy steals the bus for the fishing trip as opposed to being allowed to use it. Another scene which varies from the novel is where McMurphy chokes the nurse until she nearly suffocates, whereas in the novel he exposes her breasts. I believe this scene is superior to Kesey’s, and is pivotal in displaying the theme of rebellion against authority. It shows great masculinity and the vast power needed to overcome authority. In the end both the film and novel have the same outcome of Chief escaping of the institution. Both represent a redemption of freedom, but the concept of freedom varies with the differing aspects of the two…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcmurphy

    • 1474 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Byronic hero is disrespectful of rank, is highly intelligent and perceptive, and has a very cunning personality. These are three characteristics that McMurphy possesses and consistently displays, which is why he should be considered a Byronic hero. Ken Kesey provides ample evidence through his rebellious actions and smart way of approaching issues. He also makes sure to exhibit his tricky, deceiving personality. In the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, McMurphy uses his qualities to become a backbone for the men on the ward, making him a Byronic hero.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The perspective many people have to society's ways, has a great impact on the way people think, believe, and hold, when faced with the issue of their ethical principles. Harper Lee, tackles this predicament and explains it through the ideas in her novel, To Kill A Mockingbird, by showing how perspective affects the beliefs people attain to. Through Atticus Finch the heroine of the novel, and the father of the protagonist Jean-Louise (Scout) and her brother, Jeremy Atticus Finch (Jem), Lee displays the wisdom of Atticus in the events surrounding the air-rifles, Scouts fighting habits, and Mrs. Dubose’s addiction, and the way that Atticus’ perspective has shaped these beliefs.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Montana 1948

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The point of view has complicated the way in which we interpret different characters. An example of this is the way David influences my views on Wesley and Frank. He used distinct phrases to position my view on Wesley such as when he says, “My father didn’t fit my idea of what he should be in his occupation”. Disappointment can be felt when reading the phrase, “didn’t fit my idea” and this positions me to feel pity for Wesley. This pity which I felt forced me to like his character more than Franks. We are also persuaded to like Marie more than Frank. Watson does this by introducing Marie before Frank and making David view on her very memorable. “And I love her,” was the most unforgettable quote David says about Marie. Watson has used David’s love for Marie to propagandise the reader to believe everything she says. After I was positioned to love Marie, Frank is introduced into the story in a very distressing situation. “If you’re not feeling better we’ll give Dr. Hayden a call” “NO! I don’t need a doctor”. The way in which Frank has been bought into the story has forced me to dislike the character. I had already deliberately been given a positive view on Marie and this has made me conclude that Frank is not a normal doctor rather than Marie being psychotic. The reason why I think the previous is likely because we are only given David’s…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are several differences between the movie and the book however only those significant enough to affect somewhat the narrative of the book would be mentioned.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays