Preview

Manuel Cardenas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Manuel Cardenas
Manuel Cardenas
Student #4394652
International Relations
Instructor: Parmelee, Elizabeth

International Relations

These five questions given are a peek of what goes on within International Relations and those questions are: 1. What does it mean to ‘study’ International Relations? 2. How do realism and liberalism differ? 3. What are the characteristics of a state? 4. What do “unipolar”, “bipolar”, “tripolar”, and “multipolar” mean? 5. Using a constructivist theoretical lens, explain the current US political relationship with Pakistan. To start off with the first question of what does it mean to study International Relations the dictionary defines it as: “a branch of political science concerned with relations between nations and primarily with foreign policies” (Merriam-webster 2014). It a focus of all nations working together to help each other in a common cause and help those in need to help prevent the spread of terrorism, crime, and balance power. It also helps the nations that need help when they are stuck in poverty or a natural disaster strikes the nation. International Relations keeps us more in communication with the world and can help prevent a future world war from happening again. Answering the second question of how realism and liberalism is quiet simple because they differ quite a bit. After reading the article of Realism and Liberalism in International Relations (Kylene Jumarang 2011) realism is more about power to protect their own state and only will look out for their own interests such as you have North Korea that only want to benefit things for themselves. Liberalism recognizes the need for an increase in power yet knows it is not capable of doing it alone so they seek cooperation with other states and in a sense develop a type of trust and peace within the world. United States thrives in liberalism for example Russia was putting troops in the border of Ukraine and with efforts the U.S. would speak to Russia’s leader and stop him from



References: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/international%20relations Kylene Jumarang, Bea. Realism and Liberalism in International Relations. July 2, 2011. http://www.e-ir.info/2011/07/02/realism-and-liberalism-in-modern-international-relations/ "The State." The Essentials of International Relations. January 1, 2010. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/polisci/essentials-of-international-relations5/ch/05/summary.aspx "A Unipolar World: Systems and Wars in Three Different Military Eras." POPULAR SOCIAL SCIENCE. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.popularsocialscience.com/2013/02/05/a-unipolar-world-systems-and-wars-in-three-different-military-eras/ "Polarity (international Relations)." Wikipedia. November 16, 2014. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarity_(international_relations) "U.S. Relations With Pakistan." U.S. Department of State. September 10, 2014. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    syllabus of psci104

    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages

    International politics is about conflicts and cooperation over the distribution of limited resources among nation-states and non-state actors who aim to maximize their welfare (i.e. security, wealth, etc.). The course is divided into three parts. 1) Actors and concepts in international relations: the first part of the course will focus on the major theoretical approaches to international politics, state and non-state actors and their roles in international politics. 2) International security: the main themes in the second part of the course include the causes of war and peace, international cooperation, alliances, deterrence, nuclear proliferation, etc. 3) International political economy: the last part involves international trade, globalization, and economic development in the less-developing countries. The course is designed to achieve the following objectives: I) to provide students an introduction to and a general familiarity with the concepts and analytical tools used in the study of international relations; II) to introduce students to the major debates and issues in international relations; and III) to promote the ability of…

    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murray, Williamson A. “The World in Conflict.” In The Cambridge History of Warfare, edited by Geoffrey Parker, 314–318, 320–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Floopty Doos

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Betts argues that three theoreticians offered models of the future that sought to explain the driving forces of world politics after the twentieth century, the century of warfare. (1 point)…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realism is conservative and negative. Realists plan for durability of the current international state of affairs. Liberalism is progressive and hopeful. Liberals believe change is necessary and inevitable. Both realism and liberalism contain truths. Liberal’s hopeful view of international politics is based on these beliefs: liberals consider states to be the main actors in international politics, they emphasize that the internal characteristics of states vary, and that these differences have extreme effects on state behavior. Liberals also believe that calculations about power matter little for explaining the behavior of good states.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Realism, as a way of interpreting international relations has often been conceived to be closely tied to the Cold War. Realism, rooted in the experience of World War II and the Cold War, is said to be undergoing a crisis of confidence largely because the lessons adduced do not convincingly apply directly to the new realities of international relations in the twenty-first century (Clinton 2007:1) Worse still, if policymakers steadfastly adhere to realist precepts, they will have to navigate “the unchartered seas of the post-Cold War disorder with a Cold War cartography, and blind devotion to realism could compromise their ability to prescribe paths to a more orderly and just system.” (Kegley 1993:141). This paper will demonstrate that this picture of realism is incomplete – realism is not an obsolete theory in contemporary international relations, but is indeed relevant - it can be, and has been applied in the twenty-first century. In order to prove this, the work of well-known political thinkers thought to be the precursors of realism, and the writings of present-day international relations analysts will be examined, and the core tenets of realism will be extracted. It will be argued that these root concepts of realist thought do not rely on the circumstances of the Cold War, and are thus not bound by its confines, with the possibility that these lessons retain their validity in addressing issues in the post-Cold War world of international relations.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Military technology and strategies have constantly evolved throughout history. However, within the last few centuries, the world has seen warfare evolve at such a rapid rate, that it seems no two wars are fought the same. With ever-changing technologies, soldiers’ duties and skills have had to adapt along with them. Yet, soldiers are not the only ones who have been affected by changes in warfare. With the emergence of the Napoleonic and World Wars, the people of a given country became involved in an effort known as a “total war.” As World War II came to an end though, the major powers in the world would never again get into a “total war.” All in all, many technological advances and tactics, in recent history, have dramatically changed the way wars are fought. The events that have seen a dramatic change in technology and/or warfare are as follows: the Industrial Revolution, the Napoleonic wars, World War I, World War II, and the Cold War (Buzard, 2006).…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To begin with, security is heart of every foreign policy of any state but the question of what constitutes being secure, security breach or generally in what context security shall be viewed opens doors to a lot of interpretations. Realists view the concept of security from a traditional perspective, which meant military, war to mention a few (Lawson, 2003: 80). This is the underlying idea behind the security that the realists seem to be addressing. As they believe in an anarchic international system where the state is the actor which is power hungry, self-serving and only concerned with its survival, their view of security has everything to do with the respective state in the international community. In other words the state fights for its protection and survival in the international sphere through war or military prowess. But the application of this theory in a quiet and peaceful world becomes problematic. A good example is now that there is peace, how does one explain peace. Even though the realists explain the peace time as being an artificially construed and temporary thing, and war being natural way the international sphere, their argument does not hold much water especially when met with liberalist views on International relations. One must stress out that the realist theory was a very much accepted and may even still be accepted because…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Rogers Kelly and Jo Thomas. History 20th Century World. Causes, Practices and Effects of Wars. N.p.: Pearson Education, 2010. Print.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weber, Cynthia, International Relations Theory A critical introduction, (2010) 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Third edition published by Routledge, pp. 13-23…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hermes, W. (2001). Global Pressures and the Flexible Response. American Military History. Retrieved from http://www.history.army.mil/books/amh/AMH-27.htm…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to gain a fuller understanding of the components involved it is first necessary to provide a brief introduction to the concepts. Theories of international relations were developed through three major debates and as such, IR ideas were traditionally dominated by the perspectives of realism, idealism and behaviouralism . Criticisms leveled by critical theorists, combined with the end of the Cold War and a generational change, led to the displacement of established axes of debate by a new constructivist approach to IR literature . Rooted in sociology, constructivism is about human consciousness and the role of this feature in…

    • 2632 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    As the world becomes increasingly globalised and the geographical boarders that once separated nations are eroded by the advancement of technology, explaining the behaviour of state interactions is a vital step in predicting the future of the international world. One tool in analyising the way states can potentially interact with each other is through the application of international theories. If a theory can be found to apply to the international system in a valid way this does much to support the explanation of international interaction that the theory introduces. This essay proposes that by applying the theory of Realism to the Persian Gulf conflict occurring in 1990, the theory can be evaluated as a successful theory, as its primary causes stemmed from realist assertions that states seek to maximise their power, evident in the United States’ focus on preserving economic and political interests in the region. Power in an international sense can be defined as having the means to get a state to do what they would not otherwise do. To understand this conflict it is necessary to gain some historical perspective and investigate the precursors for the conflict itself.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Extended Essay History

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Jack Donnelly, ‘The Ethics of Realism’, in Christian Reus-Smit, Duncan Snidal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 150…

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: 1. “Raymond Aron: the recovery of the political”, by Brian C. Anderson, Rowman & Littlefield, 1997, available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=R_pN217buekC&dq=Aron+follower+of+realism&hl=ru&source =gbs_navlinks_s 2. “Introduction to International Political Economy”, by, D. N. Balaam and M. Veseth, 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism”, by David Baldwin, ed., New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. “The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism”, by Barry Buzan, Charles Jones, and Richard Little, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. “The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?”, by Barry Buzanin in Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski, eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond,Cambridge University Press, 1995. “The Twenty Years ' Crisis”, by Edward H. Carr, 1919-1939, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964. “Hans J. Morgenthau’s Version of Realpolitik”, by C.V. Crabb and JR.J. Savoy, Louisiana State University, available at: http://www.mmisi.org/pr/05_01/cs.pdf…

    • 3476 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Subsequent US interaction with Pakistan was aimed only towards securing US nationals’ safety in the region and strategising US operations in Afghanistan. That’s why Joint Chiefs of Staff and CIA topdog visited Pakistan recently – not to help India, but to safeguard their own interest.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays