Preview

Berlin Crisis of 1961 from Perspective of Realism Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Berlin Crisis of 1961 from Perspective of Realism Theory
Introduction Berlin Crisis of 1961 was the most dangerous moment of the Cold War. This conflict was mainly about the occupational status of Berlin. Berlin Crisis initially emerged in 1958 by the provocation of the Soviet Union. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev threatened to conclude a separate peace treaty with East Germany unless the western powers recognized the Germany Democratic Republic (GDR) (I. W. Trauschweizer, 2006). However, the escalation of tensions began after the Vienna Summit in June 1961, where the USSR again raised the issue of ultimatum, which gave the United States six months for the withdrawal of Western armed forces from West Berlin.
Berlin Crisis was not the only crisis during Cold War. Through the whole history of humanity there has always been a question why do wars and conflicts occur? In order to give an answer to this question we should explain some factors which made the war to occur. Crisis and especially Berlin Crisis can be understood from several perspectives, but in this paper it will be explained from realism theory perspective.
As a famous representative of realism theory, Waltz asked himself the question why do wars occur? “Waltz’s question is as old as war itself, possibly because “to explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” (Waltz, 1959: 2). By the time Waltz posed this question, many answers to it already existed. These answers fell into three categories (or as IR theorists came to define them, were found at the three “levels of analysis” or in the “three images”). These three categories/levels/images are: the individual, the state, and the state system” (C. Weber, 2009, p. 17). These main causes of conflict will be represented in detail in the main body of the paper by the example of Berlin Crisis.
Although Waltz’s three categories of the causes of war explained many processes in the Berlin Crisis, there are also important points in the theory of realism, which



Bibliography: 1. Ingo, Wolfgang, Trauschweizer, Tanks at Checkpoint Charlie: Lucius Clay and the Berlin Crisis, 1961–62, Cold War History Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2006, Routledge, pp. 205–228 2. Weber, Cynthia, International Relations Theory A critical introduction, (2010) 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Third edition published by Routledge, pp. 13-23 3. Walt, Stephen M, International Relations: One World, Many Theories, Foreign Policy, (1998) Spring, pp. 31-32 4. Gearson, John P. S., The Berlin War Crisis: perspectives on Cold war Alliances, (2002), Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-43 5. Lunak, Petr, Khrushchev and the Berlin Crisis: Soviet Brinkmanship Seen From Inside, (2003), EBSCO Publishing, pp. 1-31 6. Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations, (2004), The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6-43 7. Joseph, Jonathan, Wright, Colin, Scientific Realism and International Relations, (2010), Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-31

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Big Crisis Dbq

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In post-war Berlin during November of 1948, various conflicts between the big Western Powers and the Soviet Union created tension between the two dominant powers. The United Nations created more tension than what was already present when they called on the leaders of Russia, United States, Great Britain, and France to “enter into “immediate conversations” to end the Berlin dispute” (UN ‘Big Crisis’). The United Nations tried to step in and demand the ending of the Berlin dispute, but this created tension between the Soviet Union and the big Western Powers because they both vetoed the decision of the Security Council. This demonstrates that neither side was going to surrender; therefore, the countries involved became tenser. In London, it was believed that the Berlin problem with the Soviet Union is only “one of many symptoms of the existing world tension” (UN ‘End Crisis’).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kavalski, E. (2015). Encounters with World Affairs An Introduction to International Relations. (Online-Ausg. ed.). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the war draws to a close and the USSR closes in on Berlin, the clash between Communism and capitalism becomes an unavoidable event. With an Allied victory, communist USSR would be a major player in determining the fate of postwar Europe. With differing societal beliefs between the capitalist west and communist USSR, the redrawing of Europe, particularly the division between West and East Berlin, left serious repercussions that played a definite impact on the Cold War.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I read documents of The Sinews of Peace (‘Iron Curtain Speech’), Central Intelligence agency report, “Consequences of a Breakdown in Four-Power Negotiations on Germany”, Letter from Khrushchev to Ulbricht regarding the situation in Berlin, and Speech by President Ronald Reagan at the Brandenburg Gate, West Berlin, ‘Remarks on East-West Relations.’ The documents took place around 1946 through 1961. As each document explains and ties together the tension that was occurring in Europe and the Wester Powers. As the division was separating major cities and countries, of control and communism that was destructing the peace and recovery of the Wars.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part of the reason that Berlin caused trouble was because it was divided in between western communist Germany, and eastern Germany. Some of the people in the western communist part wanted out of there and just simple crossed the boarder to eastern Germany. Naturally, the western part built a huge dividing wall between them to keep it's people locked inside. Eastern Germany didn't like that at all and they wanted the people to come over from the western side. So they tried to help them get over or around the wall. This created more problems in the beginning of the Cold War.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Galante, P. (1965). The Berlin Wall. London: Arthur Baker Ltd.; 1St Edition edition (1965).…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mingst, A. K. & Arrenguin, M. I. 2011. Contending Perspectives: How to think about International Relations Coherently, Essentials of International Relations. 5th ed. New York: WW Norton & Company.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the lack of definition, realism has been successful and has become a dominate theory in international relations (Rosenberg, 1994). Therefore defining it remains an active argument, meaning realist scholars continue to debate the fundamental assumptions of realist…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within this period however, marks the closest instances of the Cold War almost becoming a hot one. The authors cover all the major historiographical themes from an intelligence perspective – the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Uprising, and the construction of the Berlin Wall. From their unique perspective as leading intelligence operatives, Murphy and Kondrashev tell the complete story of the Berlin Tunnel. Despite it’s limited scope, the book offers new material and extensive documentation. Making use of previously classified Soviet and American intelligence archives for the first time, Battleground Berlin is able to paint a clearer picture of what was really occurring at the time. In addition, existing analysis is drawn upon and strength and weaknesses of each interpretation analyzed, often comparatively, to offer readers multiple perspectives and provide a more general understanding of…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The one of theory in International Relations is the Neorealism as Waltz mentioned in his book “Theory of International Politics” (1979). Waltz became the first and most resolute reformer of political realism theory who has called in question a number of its postulates "from within" of the realism. His works and work of his supporters such as Robert Gilpin, John…

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the late 1940’s, the United States and Soviet Union had become locked in a Cold War. For about forty-three years, although no war between the superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union was ever officially declared, the leaders of the democratic West and the Communist East faced off against each other. The war was a dreadful time for both sides, keeping all citizens on edge. Many major events in global history including the rise of the Berlin Wall and the Cuban Missile Crisis were related to the Cold War.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the decreased amount of conflict in today’s world, there is still violence from those who oppose the liberal democratic “world community.” One may ask, how would a Classical Realist explain the “irrationality” behind these aggressors?? Unlike Liberalism, Classical Realism recognizes the need for theory to be in touch with concrete…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr, Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr and George Kennan consider that international relations should be realistic, as opposed to the realistic ones, although, a few years later, R. Ashley discards realism because it is undermined by „international antinomies” and because it is far from being a „harmonious tradition”. M.J. Smith, Roger Speagle and K. Goldmann favour the same conclusion, claiming that this collection of ideas which are labelled „realism” is so vagne and incoerent that is wrong to believe in the very existence of Realism and of converging points of view.…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Donnelly, J., Realism and International Relations, The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pg.6-13.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays