For only 3 to 4 from every thousand cases analyzed by radiologist are cancerous and thus an abnormality may be overlooked. As a result, radiologists fail to detect 10-30% of cancers [13]. It has been suggested that double reading i.e., independent mammogram interpretation by two radiologists, may increase the sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening by 10% to 15 % [14]. As the consequences of errors in detection or classification are costly, and since mammography alone cannot prove that a suspicious area is timorous, malignant or benign, the tissue has to be removed for closer examination using breast biopsy
For only 3 to 4 from every thousand cases analyzed by radiologist are cancerous and thus an abnormality may be overlooked. As a result, radiologists fail to detect 10-30% of cancers [13]. It has been suggested that double reading i.e., independent mammogram interpretation by two radiologists, may increase the sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening by 10% to 15 % [14]. As the consequences of errors in detection or classification are costly, and since mammography alone cannot prove that a suspicious area is timorous, malignant or benign, the tissue has to be removed for closer examination using breast biopsy