Preview

Malcolm X Speech Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Malcolm X Speech Rhetorical Analysis
In Martin Luther King‘s speech he speaks with such passion and determination, you can tell in his voice that he means everything he says and his hope reaches out to people and the way he emphases his words captures the audience’s attention. He believed that every person should be equal despite their skin color. In Malcolm X's speech he talks more about himself and he thought it would be best for everyone to keep their religion to themselves. He believed that the black people were trapped by the white people. He thought of white people as the enemy and he mostly spoke negatively about them. He made jokes throughout his speech and to me he didn’t sound at serious as Martin Luther. For example Martin said “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert. Violence is immoral because it …show more content…
Martin Luther King, Jr. wanted a more peaceful approach. He hoped that with sit-ins and peace marches to appeal to the ideals of dignity and justice in the white people of the time. To show them the wrong they were doing so that they would want to correct it in themselves out of their own personal honor. Malcolm X on the other hand believed that white people would never give up their power, at least early on in his career as a civil rights leader. He believed they would only give it up if forced to do so, and that meant through militant means. He eventually give this idea up in favor of more peaceful means after finding white Muslims who treated him and other black men as brothers; and black men who treated white people as brothers as well. And with this he began to realize that they could live in peace, and so he switched to a more peaceful style in his protests in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Serving his ten year sentence in a state prison Malcolm X encounters a religious teacher named Baines (Albert Hall) who provided knowledge on Islamic beliefs. He too was a manipulator. He taught Malcolm X not to have self-hatred in exchange for hate people of Caucasian descent. For instance, in one scene Baines interrupts Malcolm X in the shower as he is using his lye straightening products. Baines offers Malcolm X a drink, which is similar to a drug to get him high. Baines does this because he known this is the only way Malcolm will speak with him. He actually even states it to Malcolm in the scene. This was a manipulation tactic similar to the one used by Archie in the bar scene. Baines becomes the connection between Malcolm X and Elijah…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the excerpt from Malcolm X’s “Message to Grassroots,” Malcolm X uses effective stylistic devices such as colorful figurative language, effective repetition, and powerful diction to persuade his audience of his argument. Malcolm X feels strongly that America has treated the people of color unjustly, and he is angry about it. He is arguing that minorities need to forget their differences, so they can unite in a common cause to gain equality and liberty. Too, he says blacks, and other “unwanted people,” should wake up to reality. They must understand they are being treated unfairly, and by doing so, can “plot a course” to become educated and therefore have the ability to defend themselves against white oppression. Malcolm’s masterful use of language makes his speech effective.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X fought for the African American population to have a voice and allow for African Americans to live their lives, without the constant burden of a racist society. Although, many would argue that this racist society still exists to this day, legally Malcolm X and Martin Luther King achieved their ultimate goal. One one hand, the way in which this purpose was going to be made was very different. King believed in the concept of integration, preaching the need to remain non- violent. On the other hand, Malcolm X taught the slogan ‘by any means necessary.'…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King and Malcolm X each suggest radically different approaches to attaining freedom and equality for African-Americans in American society. Dr. King's approach was against violence by all means. He stated that “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.” Dr. King was a firm believer in the power of unconditional love. He did not want to stoop to the level of the racists to attain equality. Malcolm X, on the other hand, believed that it was every…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan Mcbride

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it comes Malcolm X’s, also known as El- Hajj Malik El- Shabazz, an African American Muslim minister and human rights activists, his approach was very bitter towards the situation. The way he was raised and brought up made him very angry towards the whites and how they treated him. His philosophy when putting an end to racism leaned more towards being violent rather than killing people with kindness and nonviolent methods. Malcolm once said,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people hear the name Malcolm X, the first thing that comes to their mind is “extremist.” But in fact, he was a teacher. Malcolm X taught Blacks to think for themselves and not allow others to think for them. He did not want Blacks believing everything that the “blonde hair, blue eyed devil” said. He educated them that everything that the newspaper said, was not real, as they should not be convinced that it was. He strongly emphasized his point in saying, “And as soon as they put the word American in there, that was supposed to lend it some respectability or legality.” Throughout his life experiences and constant reading and studying, he teaches the Black community to guard their minds against the tricks of the press. This analysis will explore Malcolm X, his purpose of speaking to the crowd, and his…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mlk Vs Malcolm X Essay

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the fifties and sixties, two main figureheads campaigned for equal African American civil rights, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Although both aimed to end the divide of inequality and racism, they went about in leading this change in very different ways. Malcolm X was influenced by his hate of white supremacy and need racial separation, yet equality, through any means necessary. While Martin Luther King Jr was motivated by his want for racial equality and complete integration through peace. Both leaders used public speeches and their faith to influence the public however King focused on success through peaceful protest and civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed in pushing where it hurt and forcing whites to accept blacks as…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Martin Luther King’s peaceful protests against narrow minded white supremacists helped him rise to national fame, Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little, lectured the United States about Islam and urged others to dismiss all whites as their enemies and arm themselves for war. Each discussed the same issues, but their methods of achievement and ideas about equal opportunity differed as much as night and day. Although both greatly influential civil rights activists, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. had some very significant differences in their backgrounds and methods of delivery in their messages of equality.…

    • 975 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both had philosophy's on racial discrimination. Martin Luther King’s philosophy on violence, public education, and integration made the most sense to Americans in 1600’s, than Malcolm X’s philosophy. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence ,because violence doesn't solve any problems and only makes problems worse. Malcolm X did not favor violence ,but believes that they can't get realization and dignity of Negroes by civil terms. Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy is more agreeable than Malcolm X’s philosophy, because King was right, violence doesn’t solve any problems and leads nowhere. King stated ,”It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.”(King,1963). Which, shows that if they weren't fighting peacefully there was only going to be more evil and violence. King says that, ”Basic to philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil.”(King,1963). Which, for ,six months the black people denied to buy items from…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The biggest difference in the two leaders comes with their leadership tactics. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed heavily in nonviolence. To achieve equality with nonviolence, he used sit-ins, marches, and protests. He traveled from city to city to spread his message of nonviolence because he felt “compelled to carry the gospel of freedom” (MLK). King felt that the answer to equality was intelligence and high morals. As blacks furthered their education they would gain rights, equality, and respect from whites (“Martin Luther King - Biography” 1). His nonviolent leadership tactics got many people across the country, and even the world interested in his beliefs. Although Malcolm X became more peaceful later on, his self-defense tactic was his original message. His motto, “By any means necessary!” meant that if believed necessary, violence was acceptable. His beliefs acted as the core for a civil rights activist group known as the Black Panthers. As time went on Malcolm X became more peaceful, yet he still stated that “I no longer subscribe to sweeping indictments of any one race,” (Malcolm X 302). Both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were very affective in the civil rights movement; they just held different beliefs in how to get equality.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The context in which a statement is made can change the entire meaning of what was said. This is why many times people will use context as a defense for statements they make that offend or cause some sort of public backlash. The manner in which a person delivers a message and what messages the rhetor chooses to deliver can be a great indication of foundation of that persons value and belief system. There are a number of value systems present in Malcolm X’s “The Ballot or the Bullet” speech that he delivered in the storied election year of 1964. There are many statements made in the ballot or the bullet speech that would paint Malcolm X in negative light. Though, the manner in which a statement is delivered relevant to the context can make the difference between a person being labeled positively or negatively. Often, when people read the words of Malcolm X in present day, without knowledge of the historical situation, his messages and his identity as a diplomat and a visionary, can get distorted. I think many fail to realize the contextual situation that Malcolm X was involved in, which caused him to come off as militant or aggressive. When really his word choice was a product of his passion and pride in what he believed in. I think many consider Martin Luther King Jr. to be the driving force behind the civil rights movement but there is just as much to be said about Malcolm X. Malcolm X is one of the most discussed, but least understood figures of contemporary history (Varda, pg.3). Malcolm X’s speech ” The Ballot or the Bullet“ was a speech given in the wake of the passing of the civil rights bill and was a call to action to not just the African American community but to all of those United States citizens who claimed to believe in human rights. The call to action was to not be satisfied and pretend like they are “Eating…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and warmth, as shown in the picture of their only meeting, their philosophies were quite different from each other (Document A). Malcolm X made it clear that he believed that the African Americans and the White people should remain separate but should be considered equal to each other. He told white people “work in conjunction with us-each of us working among our own kind.”(Document C). Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, continuously preached equality and desegregation. He wanted White people and African Americans to work together. He said in his famous speech, “we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to climb up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.” (Document B). It is evident that Malcolm X was only trying to push America backwards. By the 1960’s, Negroes were already enrolled in White schools and he was encouraging blacks to establish all black institutes and educational work shops (Document E). Martin Luther King’s philosophy was perfect at the time because it was pushing America forward more into desegregation.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ssfffg

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Malcolm X also had a limited impact on the development of Civil Rights because being a member of the NOI meant he believed in separatism; but the way forward was to work with liberal whites, but Malcolm X dismissed that idea. Many considered him to be irresponsible and negative, because of instead uniting with other activists he openly criticised; he once said that King was an “Uncle Tom” because he was to willing to work with whites to further the movement. Also this made Black people look just as bad as the white people so this made other people think that black people didn’t deserve equality on the other hand MLK was trying to prove them wrong and Malcolm X was pulling him down…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These two inspirational leaders were fighting for the same cause; equal rights for black and white Americans. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had very different beliefs and tangible differences in the actions of their followers in how to achieve equal rights. Martin Luther King was fighting for a ‘colour-blind ' society where people would be judged and valued on their skills and characters rather than the colour of their skin:…

    • 3304 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X was a minister and he stood for civil rights. He would stand up and speak for black Muslims. Malcolm X also got arrested for breaking into a man’s house and robbed him. Malcolm X would speak about what he wanted in civil rights and that made him famous because he had a lot of people that would support his movement. Malcolm X had most of the black people help him silently protest his thoughts. They would do that by walking the streets with signs that would say stuff like “Black Power” and “We demand equal rights now!”. Malcolm X is also known for meeting up with Martin Luther King Jr. They met up about the black power movement and the civil rights bill that they would both be…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays