Preview

Lumpers And Splitters Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lumpers And Splitters Analysis
What would one consider themselves as, a lumper or a splitter? A hyper specific individual with extreme perception or a regular John Doe? A normal school age child or one labeled with a disability such as autism? In Grandin and Johnsons article “Lumpers and Splitters: What makes animals and autistic people different” they have a theory and consider someone who generalizes things a lumper, whereas animals and autistic people are considered splitters because they “particularize” things. This theory can be proven by testing anyone to show how to go about doing things such as describing objects they see or characterizing things. In the show, Sherlock, Sherlock has shown characteristics that can help prove Grandin’s theory. It will be proven that …show more content…
He realized that the woman was walking in the rain with her collar up because it was damp and that she was carrying a small suitcase due to the splashed mud on her ankles and none of the other detectives and officers on the scene noticed these details. Another example, in the show is when Sherlock is to pick between a pill that will kill him slowly and alone or by getting shot brutally in the front of the head with a black handgun by, the cabbie, the taxi driver. Sherlock chose to be shot in the front of the head by the cabbie in cold blood because he is so hyper-specific and has such extreme perception. That he knows that the black gun isn't really a real gun with bullets but only an imitation toy version made to look like the real thing. He states, “I've seen a lot of guns in my day and I know a fake one when I see one” (Sherlock). This is proving Grandin’s theory regarding the characteristics of hyper specificity and extreme perception, as well as, showing that Sherlock is a splitter. He particularized the characteristics of a fake versus a real gun and noticed the small details that a normal person would not have noticed, but that a person with some characteristics of autism would have. A lumper would have just seen a gun and would have freaked out and wouldn't have been able to see the difference between a fake and a real

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Holmes did exceptionally well with getting the admiration of women, his mysteriously blue eyes lured them in. Larson goes into deeper explanation about Holmes’s character, “He broke prevailing rules of casual intimacy: He stood too close, stared too hard, touched too much and long. And women adored him for it” (36). This shows that Holmes did things differently, not many bothered though because he was attractive and the women seemed to relish him. This allowed H.H’s murders to be left as a secret, his appearance of a doctor allowed him to be considered above everyone else, and he also owned a hotel. However, people couldn't hear his thoughts Larson explains Holmes’s uncontrollable urge, “It was the details of the building that gave him the most pleasure… There would be a large basement with hidden chambers and a subbasement for the permanent storage of sensitive material… He could hardly imagine the pleasure that would fill his days when the building was finished and flesh-and-blood women moved among its features. As always, the thought aroused him” (67). The way Holmes thinks makes him not only a murderer, his state of reverie is a women's flesh and blood and the way it moves. His peers were not able to see the side of him, he was able to hide it very well under all of his beauty and wealth he would be the most unsuspecting murder in this white…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    SU PSY1001 W2 A2 Whelchel

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How were Watson and Rayner able to condition Albert to react to different stimuli such as masks, other animals, and a fur coat? Explain the concept of generalization.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Written in the essay, “Could You Be the Next Sherlock?” by Kristen Lewis, it states that Sherlock Holmes is mindful. As written in the play, “The Red-Headed League,” Sherlock Holmes must solve a mystery. While solving the mystery, Holmes shows traits similar to the traits the author wrote about in “Could You Be the Next Sherlock?” In the essay it states, “He could probably tell that you overslept just by looking at your socks.”…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Dr Roylott Guilty

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sherlock was not guilty due to the fact he did not know that Dr. Roylott would be bit by a snake; swamp adder. In the story, “The Adventures of the Speckled Band,” Dr. Roylott was murdered by his snake the he had trained over a period of time. Audience may believe that Sherlock was guilty and many think that he was not. In Sherlock’s offense, he did not mean to kill Dr. Roylott; meaning that the murder of Dr. Roylott was not premeditated. Also, Sherlock was self-defending himself. Sherlock did not want to die and he also had to protect the lives of two other people because it was his job. Helen had to hire Sherlock to protect her from her peculiar husband. Another reason in which that Sherlock should not be guilty is Sherlock did not know that Dr. Roylott was sitting in the chair next to the ventilator. Sherlock was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia and wanted to murder Helen due to money concerns.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Holmes killed, he had all the time and privacy needed to dissect his victims and remove their organs. Contrarily, the Ripper had to murder in an alley, because he had nowhere private to kill which resulted in him working fast to prevent getting caught. Even though the Ripper’s job was messy, it was extremely precise. Tom Michael announced that when the Ripper murders were happening it was stated that the killer must have had some knowledge of the human body; it was even suggested that the murderer was a doctor. Coincidentally, Holmes had been a doctor for years at the time of the Ripper murders. The fact that there were people at the time saying the Ripper had anatomical knowledge just adds one more connection between Holmes and the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Scandal In Bohemia

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The famous fictional detective Sherlock Holmes, created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, is known for his keen observation skills and logical thinking that has outsmarted criminal masterminds. His ability to conclude a theory from reason and logic is impressive; however, “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts" (Scandal, 3). For his cases, Holmes gathers up data and information in any way he can, one being the art of disguise. The use of disguises play a significant part in crime solving because they allow Holmes to conceal his identity so he can gather information and ultimately deceive society.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherlock Holmes is a very strange man. He is a detective who can solve a mystery without even seeing what seems to be like too much evidence. His ethics are very interesting. He believes that murder cases turn out to have very complex ways of happening. He does not believe in the solar system, which the narrator thought was very weird. His decision to join the case to help was a just decision, because without him the case wouldn’t have been solved correctly. Holmes seems to always stick with his beliefs, not matter what the situation was, even after the case seemed like it was solved.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only a few hours after the shooting took place, James Stephens identified Brenton Butler as the suspect. During one of the scenes in the documentary his testimony relevant to the identification was shown. As the police were walking Butler towards the crime scene, James Stephens was somehow able to confirm that he was the shooter from fifty feet away. He was then allowed to sit in the back of a patrol car next to Butler to confirm that he was in fact correct. This situation is called a showup. Because of the inherent suggestiveness of a showup, this was the one of the factors that lead to a misidentification. Another factor was the lack of sequential lineups performed by the police department. There are inherent benefits to showup identifications, but there are also limitations. The burden was on the detectives to run James Stephens through at least one more lineup. A systematic lineup, either as a…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Little Albert

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How were Watson and Rayner able to condition Albert to react to different stimuli such as masks, other animals, and a fur coat? Explain the concept of generalization.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherlock Holme Analysis

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As Helen Stoner sits before him for her consultation he is observing everything and proves this by asking her if she took the train that morning. As she is shocked by his accurate theory Sherlock Holmes responds with, “I observe the second half of a return ticket in the palm of your left glove,” giving his client a glimpse of his observation process (Doyle, The Adventure of the Speckled Band 1). She goes on to explain her own theory of how she believes her sister has died of pure fear. However, Holmes is not quite satisfied with these results because she forgets to speak about her stepfather, “’he is a hard man,’ she said, ‘and perhaps he hardly knows his own strength,” as he notices her wrist displays an imprint of a hand (Doyle, The Adventure of the Speckled Band 5). In “The Blanched Soldier,” Sherlock demonstrates the same observation method as Mr. James Dodd sits before him for the interview. He begins to take some guesses about where Dodd is from by saying, “from South Africa, sir, I perceive,” “Imperial Yeomanry, I fancy,” “Middlesex Corps, no doubt,” all were accurate, giving James the same shock as Helen Stoner (Doyle, The Blanched Soldier 1). James did most of the investigation himself before meeting with Sherlock, while he trusted his every word he listened carefully…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I need a case.”, the gun dangled from between his fingers, his hazel eyes resting upon the ceiling above. Sherlock sat there, his gaze on the ceiling; listening to the ticking of the…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using his toy gun, he is able to apprehend the burglar. It’s said that he is playing “Private Eye” using Mattel’s Tommy-Burst Detective set. The rifle can be used as an automatic or a single action weapon. The detective set also includes a “snub nose 38” pistol, wallet, badge, ID card and side holster for the weapon. The use of these toys shows that by purchasing Mattel’s detective set, a child’s detective play can be as realistic as possible.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How were Watson and Rayner able to condition Albert to react to different stimuli such as masks, other animals, and a fur coat? Explain the concept of generalization.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firearms

    • 2908 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Firearms evidence and identification has become a crucial part in investigation and solving crimes. It has led to thousands of successful investigations that otherwise would not have been. You see it in the news and on TV shows like CSI. Although CSI is far from true forensic science, the concept is still there. What is firearms evidence? How is it examined? This paper will look at the history of firearms identification and examine the two previous questions.…

    • 2908 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spearman 's theory is supported by a high IQ and very simple cognitive tasks. These tests are considered very simple; for example, one test that might be done is to see how fast a person reacts to hearing a sound by raising their hands. On the other hand, Gardner 's theory has a solid biological basis, and has biological facts. He studies the different parts of the brain of different individuals, because no two individuals are alike.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics