Preview

Life Without Parole

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1150 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Life Without Parole
This essay will consist of many of my ideas and opinions on sentencing teens to life without parole. I agree that teenagers deserve life without parole for heinous crimes like first and second degree murder depending on whether or not the teenage offender planned out their crimes or the crime was committed in the heat of the moment out of anger or sadness. The teens that are in these programs and have lesser sentences should also only have 2 more chances to mess up and commit more crimes before they are sentenced to life without parole. I also believe that all the teens that planned out their crimes should be where they are in prison. There is another reason why teens commit crimes, It is the undeveloped of their frontal lobes of their brains …show more content…
I believe this because when circumstances like what happened in the previous paragraph happen it’s a matter of a child having a messed up outlook on life because of how he was raised and treated growing up so this is not the child's fault it’s the parents and they got what they deserve for abusing him so cruelly. This was self defence in every way. In this article Mr. Barnes tells us that “The Supreme Court ruled Monday that those sentenced as teenagers to mandatory life imprisonment for murder must have a chance to argue that they should be released from prison”. I agree with this statement because if the teen was wrongfully accused for a crime or it was an act of self defence then the teens don’t deserve to be sentenced so …show more content…
There are many different programs that help out troubled teens to cope with the actions they took. These programs would only be for the ones that deserve it like Nathaniel Brazil he was sentenced to life. He is actually trying to become a better person unlike Lionel Tate who committed many more crimes after he went on parole. I got the information about Nathaniel Brazil and Lionel Tate from these two articles “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson and “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom. In the article “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” Lionel Tate was sentenced to life in prison that people believed he didn’t deserve it because he accidentally killed the little girl while playing, at the time I would have thought the same thing but after researching more on his trial I found out some pretty startling information. I think this information that Ms. Lundstrom provided is accurate because she quoted info from a news story in the “Sacramento Bee”. She says “Last month in Sacramento, a fifteen year-old Yuba City youth who reportedly claimed he was mimicking a TV program about little girls who rob a bank was given 26-years-to-life prison term. Tried as an adult, Thomas A. Preciado was fourteen when he stabbed to death a mini mart clerk”. I later found out that after Lionel Tate was released on parole because his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PBS’s “Second Chance Kids” film is about juveniles who commit heinous crime being giving a second chance to get out of prison and start their life over. The reason for the court creating this new law, enabling inmates that were sentenced to life without parole in prison, is to allow for the opportunity of rehabilitation of the juveniles. Sentencing a juvenile to life without parole is inhumane, because takes away any incentive for that individual to rehabilitate themselves. It is also unfair, because as a minor your brain is still developing which causes minors to act irrational or without thinking, so when a teenage commits a terrible crime that should not be able to define the rest of their life. Some commonalities all the individuals considered…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile’s should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because teens are at the age of knowing right from wrong. In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” Jennifer’s sister was shot, while begging for the life of her unborn baby. The teen had a friend who testified at his trial about his friends “Thrill Kill” the teen just wanted to “See what it would feel like to shoot someone”. The young teen knew what he was doing but still went through it knowing the consequences.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Their crimes may even become more serious in nature. Therefore, teens that commit heinous crimes should be punished for their obnoxious behavior. In “Juvenile Doesn’t Deserve Life Sentences” by Gail Garinger, he states that “a juvenile doesn’t deserve life in prison because most teens haven’t reached their full maturity”.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    sometimes it was the kid that suffer the brutality or even it was something they watched…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniles shouldn't get sentenced to life without parole for committing a crime at a young age. A punishment is necessary but, sentenced to life without parole at a young age is devastating. Why should they even continue to live? They are young and deserve a second chance to rehabilitate. All we do is just throw these kids in prison and forget about the. What these kids need is treatment especially, those raised in violet environments. Sometimes they grow up unaware of what's good or bad. It may not be there fault. I'm not stating that they don't deceive a punishment, what the need is a punishment but also the support of a person.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before 1980, life without parole was very rarely imposed on children. In today’s society we are consumed with the idea of keeping everyone safe; this has led to a high incarceration rate, especially with minors. In America, currently 2,225 minors are sentenced to life without parole before they turn eighteen. The criminal justice system works on a three strike system, which means you have three minor offenses before you go to jail. Also with the strikes, you are judged on if your crime was of passion or pre-meditated. In the past the issue in judging each situation was that sometimes “children” or minors were charged as adults, due to mandatory minimum sentencing. This is no longer the issue because in 2012, the Supreme Court case (Miller v. Alabama) found mandatory minimum sentencing unconstitutional under the 8th amendment, (which bans cruel and unusual punishments). The problem now is what the Supreme Court forgot to address in there ruling; does this ruling apply to the roughly three hundred adults serving life without parole that were sentenced as juveniles. Adolfo Davis is the leading case that is addressing…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentenced As Adults

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many teenagers who do violent crimes, but to many people it’s different on how they should be punished. Most people who I spoke to said it all depends upon the crime and then there are some people who think the teenagers’ accused of the violent crime should be sentenced as adults, because they chose to act like adults. While it is wrong to commit a violent crime for a young teenager, I believe that they should not be sentenced as adults, because they have not yet developed full cognitive ability, should have the opportunity to counseling, and they should have a chance at life for a new beginning.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Justice Case

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On June 25, 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed crime could not be sentenced to life in prison. This ruling has been disagreed by some people in the past. I agree with the Supreme Court's ruling on how juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison. This is the right thing to do for them because their brains are not fully developed. Also when the juveniles are in prison they should get some sort of help or counseling so when they get out they got the help they needed.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question is, should teens who murder be tried as adults? I would have to say yes. If one can understand what murder is, he or she should also understand that it’s wrong. Everyday a grown person or a teenager is being arrested for murder. If one is big enough to do the crime, than he or she can do the time. It’s not about being old enough to understand because at the age of 14 or 15 years old one has learned the difference in right and wrong; therefore, one knows the action is wrong and should take the consequences for the wrong they committed just like any other person should. It wouldn’t be fair if say a 30 year old man gets arrested for rape and takes it on upon himself to stab his victim to death and gets life in prison, but then a 15 year old kid who knows what he is doing as well gets arrested for the same crime and gets away with it. It wouldn’t be fair because, not only did that 15 year old get away with murder because of his age, but that family has to sit there in grief and pain knowing that this 15 year old just got away with murder; this kid could also thinking its ok to do it again because I’m just a kid, but that 15 year old kid is about to go attack another person.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do Teens Who Murder

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Teens who commit murder should be charged as an adult because of their horrific actions. I’ve done some research and found some info about teens that murder, and what the normal charge is for them. But some cases are very horrific, and very unbelievable that people could commit such crazy crimes. From murdering a classmate to shooting a mother and her infant child at point blank range, as well as the psychological aspect of why people murder, let alone why teens murder.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays