Preview

Children Deserve Life Sentences Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Children Deserve Life Sentences Summary
Activity 21 Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed. In the article by Gail Garinger, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences,” the author talks about how children are too young to be put in prison for life. The only place in the world that sentences juveniles to life is the United States, with 79 adolescents that were sentenced to die in prison. Some argue that even though they are children, they still have commited the crime. Others argue that children are biologically different from adults.The author states that if …show more content…
When Brazill was fourteen, he shot his favorite school teacher because he did not let Brazill play games with the class. This can show that an undeveloped brain cause spontaneous decisions that an adult would normally not do. Sentencing a kid to life for committing a crime during their developing years is cruel. Juveniles should be punished for their actions, but should also be given another chance when their brain is fully developed. The findings on the teenage brain shows how their brain can be a cause of their actions. This gave people an insight on why teenages would commit such crimes. Some argued that due to their actions, they should be tried as any other adult and be sentenced to life in prison. However, they should not be sentenced to life as a teenager due to their brains still being in development as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vincent M. Southerland and Jody Kent Lavy write about their take on sentencing children to life in prison without parole and why it's wrong. Throughout the article the authors have you thinking about how cruel and harsh of a sentence life in prison is for children. A good argument the two authors make is that “young people are more susceptible to peer pressure than adults, and less capable of thinking through the consequences of their actions and assessing risks”. Through this statement the authors point out the physiologically a child doesn't have fair judgment. When adults are sentenced to life in prison their brains have already matured and should fully understand the difference between right and wrong, but children are still in the process…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    n the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” the author was very bias, and only talked about what he believed to be true and right, that teenagers have massive losses of brain tissue in areas of self control which almost is the cause to teenagers impulsive actions and committing crimes. I disagree with the author on this statement for reasoning why teenagers act the way they do, he uses this as an excuse. Teenagers must have always loss brain tissue, and just because they lose some self control, that does not make it okay to go out and kill someone or commit and henious crime. Even with loss of brain tissue teenagers and kids know the difference from right and wrong. All teenagers should know the seriousness of what they have committed,…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile’s should be convicted as adults for violent crimes because teens are at the age of knowing right from wrong. In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” Jennifer’s sister was shot, while begging for the life of her unborn baby. The teen had a friend who testified at his trial about his friends “Thrill Kill” the teen just wanted to “See what it would feel like to shoot someone”. The young teen knew what he was doing but still went through it knowing the consequences.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jazmyne Garcia Shywanda Royal English 12b 04/6/16 Juveniles deserve life sentencing It is more likely for teenagers to commit heinous crimes when they have been emotionally and physically abused. Teenagers who suffer from a mental illness are more likely to commit recidivism than an adult that has random encounters with the law. Prosecutors who try juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was a young adult.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile receives crucial punishment, how could you give a twelve year old sentenced to life without possibility of parolo. Now that is just heartless to do something like that to a juvenile. The reason for juvenile being tried as adult is what happened in the 80s and 90s, many juvenile were in gangs and causing tremendous crime making the crime rate raise for the younger generation.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniles shouldn't get sentenced to life without parole for committing a crime at a young age. A punishment is necessary but, sentenced to life without parole at a young age is devastating. Why should they even continue to live? They are young and deserve a second chance to rehabilitate. All we do is just throw these kids in prison and forget about the. What these kids need is treatment especially, those raised in violet environments. Sometimes they grow up unaware of what's good or bad. It may not be there fault. I'm not stating that they don't deceive a punishment, what the need is a punishment but also the support of a person.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juvenile justice system has been in existence for over 100 years. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the child, not to enforce excessive punishment. The system involves children under the age of eighteen years old. There is a line between juveniles and adult offenders. Just because the offender is under the age of eighteen, does that make him or her incapable of being charged for a crime and be convicted just like an adult? This question comes to mind when a child commits a crime such as murder. Should a child be convicted and suffer the same consequences as an adult? Or should the system just accept the fact that the child does not know any better and release them? From a moral standpoint, it would not be fair to subject a child to the death penalty but it seems like the justice system outweighs many moral standpoints.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teenagers accused of violent crimes should not be tried as adults in a court of the law. Teenagers brains are not fully developed, from the ages 13-18 a projected number of, “one percent of gray matter is lost every year in teenagers,” and these are the teens being tried as adults in court (Spinks). A growth of gray matter is an important development stage in teens. The gray matter grows mostly when the brain is stimulated through accelerated learning, social interactions and in athletics. In a teenagers brain, the stimulation occurs in the prefrontal cortex, which is located behind the forehead. If teenagers are not given the opportunity to plead their case in court, it can lead to other developmental issues. These issues can stunt other brain growths in teenagers. Thus, the growth of the frontal cortex is a study in teenage brain development. The frontal cortex becomes enhanced during young adult years, which can conclude to an undeveloped brain in teens. The adult punishments brought upon teenagers is discriminatory because of the slower brain development in teenagers. Many neuroscientists have concluded that, teenagers have a, “very immature brain structure” (Spinks). Adults have mature frontal lobes, as opposed to teenagers with non-developed and immature frontal lobes. Although the brain maturity in teens is an issue, adults continue to be biased regarding teenage crimes. Adults must consider brain development in teenagers when any teen is being accused of a crime.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying Juveniles

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trying juveniles has been a topic to the public we hear about in the judustrial system. It contains a lot of arguments which has its pros and cons. Considering being a juvenile delinquent you must commit a crime that is under the age of 18. Prosecutors can charge juveniles as adults when they are suspected of violent offenses or crime. Back in time when this happened, this treatment involved the death penalty. As of today it involves being prosecuted through adult courts and incarcerated in the adult jails and prisons. Addressing this topic is important because society is not aware what happened or what is happening to juveniles being tried as adults. After reading this paper, you will learn different offenses juveniles commit and why it leads to being tried as adults. You will know how the death penalty came in effect, ended, and the different cases that happened between times. I will talk about juveniles being prosecuted through adult courts and the benefit of it. Also juveniles being incarcerated with adults and the risks they face. My intention of writing this paper is to get you to know the research I gained from it, and hoping it interest you to do more research on it too. Do convicting a juvenile as adults helps stop crime.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles do not deserve life sentences, because placing them in a facility with adults will only decrease the possibility…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays