Preview

LaPierre Gun Control

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LaPierre Gun Control
Claudia Peinado
Professor Nelson
RWS 100
26 November 2013 Gun Control
INTRO: In Wayne LaPierre’s transcript of the “Newton Shooting”, and Sam Harris’ “Riddle of the Gun” both authors touch upon scenarios within our society and lead into their personal opinions on behalf of each situation. In response to the Newtown Shooting, where 26 children and staff were brutally murdered, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and American philosopher and author Sam Harris attempt to convince the public that we need armed security guards in our schools to protect our children. Although LaPierre and Harris use different rhetorical strategies to convey their claims, their purposes and overall argument are quite similar as they both try to change societies view on guns, gun violence, and gun policy in our society. In making their arguments both authors use several statistics and analyze several gun laws to show that guns are not the cause behind these mass murders. How is that we live in a world where security guards have guns at virtually every mall, movie theatre, or airport yet when the debate arises on why we don’t have guns to protect our children in our school districts the answer is simply that we do not have the funds? In they apply the rhetorical strategies of compare/contrast, definition, and rhetorical questioning his speech LaPierre utilizes the rhetorical strategy of identification in which he connects himself to his audience, whereas Harris utilizes the rhetorical strategy of prolepsis for which he voices the opinion of the majority and then paints a picture on why these opinions when put into action would prove ineffective.

PATHOS: In the transcript of the “Newton Shooting “speech LaPierre utilizes the rhetorical strategy of pathos EXPLAIN PATHOS by relating his speech to his audience by speaking of the “most beloved, innocent and vulnerable members of the American family—our children who are being left utterly defenseless”(65). In hopes of hitting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “shootings”, Adam Gopnik speaks about a shooting that took place in Virginia Tech Engineering building, and how the parents of the victims were told that it was not the right moment to ask questions. Gopnik also gives his points of view on how the shooting could have been avoided. Gopnik suggests that the main reason why these types of incidents keep happening in the United States is because there is a lack of security and requirements on who should not be able to buy a gun. The government should do what others countries are doing, and Gopnik’s example, is the massacre that happened in Paris Suborn of Nanterre in 2002, when a man killed eight people at a municipal meeting. Gun control became a key issue in the presidential…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Leonard Pitts’ article “We Fail Our Children As More Succumb To Guns Every Day” Pitts states his argumentation on ongoing gun fatalities such as, deaths of babies, young children, and young adults. Although he presents his points and opinions, Leonard Pitts’ failed to prove his point and conclude his argument on guns being the problem of our nation.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the relevant speakers, Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (Democrat; Michigan) gave an especially potent speech responding to the disturbing increase in gun violence across the United States. Through emotional and personal appeals, Dingell characterizes and responds to the rhetorical situation by classifying the exigence – or the…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis introduces pathos into his speech when he is describing the violent methods of the government against blacks. For example, Lewis vividly describes the notorious actions of the government when saying, “What did the federal government do when local police officials kicked and assaulted the pregnant wife of Slater King, and she lost her baby?” (para. 6). In this statement, Lewis shows how the government has failed to keep black people safe and continue to harm them, and that these people harmed can not recover from the pain they have received. Lewis utilizes pathos in order to gain the audience's support, to gain their sympathy and perhaps make the event sound more gruesome than it actually was, which nonetheless was an inhumane act…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sullivan, William. Weighing the Gun Control Arguement. American Thinker. 24 Feb. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2013…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the founding of our country up until modern times there has been a separation on the beliefs of civilians owning guns. But gun control simply put, is a waste of time. It is highly ineffective in areas that gun control has been enacted in the United States. As well as “Gun Free Zones” being centralized high-target opportunities. (Small areas densely occupied by unarmed and defenseless citizens.) Thus allowing (in the rare instances it occurs like Newtown, Aurora, and Virginia Tech) a shooter a densely filled area of unarmed people to fire upon, causing mass causalities. In such areas the only protection they have are, Police/EMS, or an illegally armed citizen to defend them in case of shootout situation.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bowling for Columbine

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Marshall once said “you can’t stop being afraid by pretending everything that scares you is there” that evidently means that fear is not real. It is the product of thoughts you create, however danger is real, but fear is a choice. When following Michael Moore’s journey in the documentary Bowling for Columbine, it is proven that most, if not all Americans live in fear. In doing so, he learns that the conventional answers of easy availability of guns ultimately lead to America’s culture of fear, bigotry and violence in a nation of widespread gun ownership. Moore’s implementation of symbolism, satirical techniques and imagery support his criticism against the firearm regulations in America. He brings in the attention of how unstable the American gun culture is as he emphasizes the consequences to generate change in the American system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 772 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author Sara Mosle reminds her readers right away about an emotional massacre that took place in Newtown, Connecticut. In her article in The New York Times called, “Preparing Students for a Newtown-like disaster” she argues her point against Louie Gohmert, the Texas Congressman who suggested that all teachers should have guns. Sara has a lot of credibility for her personal thoughts and what she believes is true about the gun laws. She is aiming this article at adults, parents, and people who vote. She is trying to change people’s mind about the gun laws. Using very good examples she shows the readers to not figure out ways to hide from the gunmen or to fight back against the gunmen but to just get rid of the amount of guns given to people not qualified to have them.…

    • 772 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip” was published in the New York Times as a powerful rhetorical analysis that persuades the audience that gun control does not mean…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control: Research Paper

    • 2655 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Zaremski, Miles J. "Guns: Screaming in Silence Is No Longer an Option." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 11 Jan. 2013. Web. 29 Mar. 2013…

    • 2655 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the spring of 2013, GREY Advertisement agency released a series of advertisements for the organization “Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.” These public service announcements, placed on billboards around the country, are intended to “reflect the absurdity of our country's current lax laws and weak regulation of guns,” (Huffington Post, 2013). Contrasting a piece of candy to an assault rifle, one image uses emotion and logic to persuade the viewer. By taking a stance in the current gun-control debates, this image rephrases a significant social and political issue still faced in America today. Although this advertisement did not create a controversy at the time of its publication,…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control on Its Way

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Paul Waldman’s “Gun control fight just beginning” appeared in the CNN news website in April 19, 2013. In this argument, Waldman aims to inform his audience about the terms of the gun control debate. The argument that he is counteracting is that people are using their ethos to give credibility to their scare tactics. This dominates the argument through pathos (lies) to completely override all example of logic to keep any gun control legislation from passing. Waldman is effective using logos to show and prove that the fight on gun control is truly just beginning. That if proponents stick with it we will be seeing some gun control laws put into affect.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Nearly three weeks after the latest mass shooting claimed the lives of nine people, 52% of Americans now oppose stricter gun control laws, 6 percentage points more than the 46% of Americans who support such laws.”(diamond,2015).In the past year, there has been many shootings. If the guns are taken away, some of these could have been solved but that’s only solving one problem. Taking them isn’t helping the helpless people that can’t defend themselves without them.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays