Preview

Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ki-Moon Pros And Cons
“A world free of nuclear weapons is a global public good of the highest order” (Ki-Moon). Ban Ki-Moon is the United Nations Secretary-General. Ki-Moon was born in South Korea, in the past, wars tore through South Korea and had received threats of nuclear destruction. Because of these tragic events, Ki-Moon feels very strongly that nuclear weapons are the world’s greatest threat (Ki-Moon). Ki-Moon was not the only to think this way. After World War l, the American people also started to see how destructive the weapons were. Senator William Borah proposed disarmament in 1920. The proposition became popular very quickly throughout the United States (Brookhiser). Although the idea of disarmament had caught on, the United States’s nuclear stockpile …show more content…
To illustrate the issue, next year the NNSA is seeking one point three billion dollars to work on six different types of nuclear weapons. Not to mention that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the United States will use around three hundred and fifty-five billion dollars on their nuclear arsenal (Feinstein). “Furthermore, our nuclear stockpile is competing for limited defense spending, money that could be used to address more pressing challenges such as the fight against the Islamic State and defending against cyber attacks” (Feinstein). As Feinstein says, nuclear weapons are an unnecessary burden on the nation's wallet. Therefore, they need to start the process of disarmament to make room for a better solution. Another key thing to remember is that the United States is already well over 18 trillion dollars in debt and …show more content…
Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cited: Hanley, Charles J. "Abolishing Nukes: Flicker of Hope to Global Cause." Msnbc.com. The Associated Press, 2010. Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My partner and I stand in negation of the resolution, “Resolved: unilateral military force is justified by the United States to prevent nuclear proliferation” for three reasons. First, interfering with foreign affairs using military force gives many countries all the more reason to undergo nuclear proliferation. Second, the fact that military force by the U.S. is unilateral, many countries are in disfavor of it and finally, preventing nuclear proliferation is too great for the U.S. alone to handle.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have read on the internet an article that included the following statement “every dollar spent on weapons is a dollar less spent on education, development, and social welfare”. Which links to my next point; The US has spent more than 5.5 trillion $ in developing their nuclear arsenal and France has spent about 1.5 trillion $. These numbers do not include the costs of testing, fissile material production, storage and disposal. The costs for other nuclear weapon states are probably similar. To put this into perspective the price of global elimination of starvation, provision of health care, provision of shelter and clean water, elimination of illiteracy, provision of sustainable…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to various online historical articles written by the history.com staff the U.S has been associated with over 230 wars since the beggining of the thirteen colonies. As the definition of “again” has inflicted, in order to make America great again we would have to return to a word of war.. With America’s past history of 239 war, another myriad of wars can be added to this list. The infamous politician, Donald J. Trump has threatened various countries as well as groups of people. He has been noted to have had said, “The United States should not try so hard to stop nuclear proliferation.” (the washington post.com) Trump had declared, “proliferation is going to happen anyway… If Japan had that nuclear war threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us. Nor would it be so bad, if South Korea and Saudi Arabia had nuclear weapons too.” The stress on anti- proliferation movements is a pathway carved for nuclear war. We would not only be returning to a world of war, but one of nuclear…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Even if you pay all this money trying to help the nation, it can negatively affect the treasury and make things worse”.This evidence supports the thesis because It is a waste of money and is so much trouble , it can cost a political criticism.Lastly nuclear weapons cost millions and makes poorer nations invest because of the cost and maintenance.It is not a good…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should the United States keep and maintain nuclear weapons today? Yes, because without nuclear weapons we would not be able to have the protection we have today since the threat of nuclear war. Which the odds of that happing are very slim since these weapons of mass destruction cause so much damage, but if the U.S where to get rid of the nuclear weapons today that would leave a huge vulnerability slot for us since the other countries would very well keep their nuclear weapons and use them against us. Therefore the United States should keep their nuclear weapons and continue to maintain them just in case of a serious threat required use one.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Iran’s unstable government has nuclear capabilities threatens not only neighboring countries like Israel but also the entire world and this situation needs to be handled as quickly as possible.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He spoke nothing but the truth. US President Reagan was a nuclear abolitionist. He believed that the only reason to have nuclear weaponry was to prevent the Soviet Union from using theirs. Between them alone the United States and Russia have more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MUN policy statment

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The delegation of Japan would like to express its delight and gratitude at being allowed to participate in these debates concerning the non-proliferation of North Korea’s nuclear power. The delegation of Japan believe that this dispute must be stopped immediately, and trusts that the other countries present will agree with the notion that under no circumstances may we appease and repeat anything that could ultimately lead to a commotion in this peaceful society. Japan feels strongly that any coercion with the nuclear must be banned, and urges the delegates to think about the misfeasance of the nuclear weapon; thus, conforming their non-sense demand. In the worst scenario, it would lead to a World War III…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rather than use militarization or be tough on iran which would encourage a hostile relationship, the U.S. should approach Iran’s nuclear ambitions by talking to Iranian leaders and persuade them that developing nuclear weapons would not be the best thing for iran’s national interests. Rather than leading to stabilization and the mad situation, it would probably lead to political coercion which would tempt other neighboring Arab countries to proliferate as well and would highlight rivalries, particularly with Israel. The U.S. needs to speak to Iranian experts, scholars, and officials to explain to them the negative implications of iran possessing nuclear weapons. I personally do not think that the u.S. should reverse Iranian ambitions or to stage a regime change. The us needs to “engage Iran diplomatically” and use a policy of carrots and sticks where…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Iranian Nuclear Negotiation is a multi-party negotiation deal between the P5 + 1 and Iran. This negotiation is about the nuclear program Iran has been undergoing, hence the enrichment of uranium to percentages capable for the use of nuclear weapons. The most recent negotiation was held in Switzerland, on a neutral ground. The P5+1 of the UN consists of the six strongest countries in the world; China, Russia, United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany. These six countries have been in negotiation deals since 2006 and now an agreement must be reached by 30th June which is the time constraint. The P5+1 party is being led by the United States of America ( "Iran parliament to review ties with U.N. nuclear body, 2011).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On March 21, 1963, President John Kennedy warned in a press conference, “I see the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15 or 20 or 25 nations may have nuclear weapons. I regard that as the greatest possible danger and hazard.” Kennedy made this statement a month after a secret Department of Defense memorandum assessed that eight countries: Canada, China, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and West Germany would likely have the ability to produce nuclear weapons within the next 10 years after 1963. It was further assessed that beyond those 10 years, the future costs of nuclear weapons programs would decrease and provide way for several more states to pursue nuclear weapons, especially if unrestricted testing continued. Fear of the spread of nuclear weapons to vast nation states and superpowers including their military and ideological allies is what urged the creation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Signed on July 1, 1968 and actually implemented on March 5, 1970, the NPT is a result of a compilation of efforts at enforcing international non-proliferation.…

    • 3128 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays