Preview

Italy's debt to France: The meeting at Plombieres.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1617 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Italy's debt to France: The meeting at Plombieres.
In 1870, with the onset of the Franco-Prussian War, France was forced to withdraw its troops from Rome where they had secured the Pope's authority since 1849. With the absence of the French soldiers, Rome came under Italian rule and this same year was declared the new capital. With this addition to the state, the task of Italian unification was complete. Finally, after eleven years of plotting, war, and compromise Italy was one. But, would any of this been possible had it not been for one crucial meeting? A meeting that resulted in the alliance of France and the Italian state of Piedmont that gave Piedmont the force it needed to run the Austrians off of the peninsula and make way for unification. This meeting at the French spa of Plombieres between Camillo Cavour and Louis Napoleon III was most definitely the catalyst that sprung the Italian unification. In this paper I plan to dissect the occurrences of the meeting, as well as display its importance and unveil the underlying factors that molded the decisions that were made. (Cohen p. 818)

Cavour knew that if there was any chance of a united Italy that it would require more effort and force than Piedmont could provide. Knowing this, Cavour entered Italy into the Crimean War on the side of the Allies in order to get a seat at the treaty talks and in turn meet with Louis Napoleon of France and Lord Clarendon of England. After meeting with both men at the Congress of Paris, Cavour was convinced that it would be the French that he would rely on for assistance (Orsi p. 219). It is no surprise that the French were willing to aid Italy in their attempt for unification, in fact there are several reasons. Primarily for the reason that France and Napoleon were viewed as the protectors of nationalism in Europe, which had been the case since the revolution. Also, because France and Austria were natural enemies and any loss of ground experienced by the Austrians was considered a bonus for the French. And lastly, because of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Italy, the Northern League’s desire for independence was based on the economic difference between the northern Po region and the southern Mezzogiorno. These differences are attributed to core-periphery processes…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cavour went down to Naples to intercept him and Garibaldi-- to avoid civil war—retired. 1861 Kingdom of Italy…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A system of alliances between the ‘Great Powers’ of Europe had survived the wars of the Spanish and Austrian succession in the first half of the eighteenth century, but the French-Indian War forced a change. In the old system Britain was allied with Austria, who was allied with Russia, while France was allied with Prussia. However, Austria was chaffing at this alliance after the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle had ended the War of the Austrian Succession in 1748, because Austria had wanted to recover the rich region of Silesia, which Prussia retained. Austria therefore began, slowly, tentatively, talking with France.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Five major city-states evolved: the duchy of Milan, the republics of Florence and Venice, the Papal States,…

    • 5631 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In consort with the supporters, there were some anti-unification leaders. The Peace of Villafranca, treaty between France and Austria (1859) stated that conjoining the territories would be easy, but Emperor Napoleon III of France wrote that he did not want Italy to unify because the nation would diminish its preponderance. Though to many it seemed and obvious choice for unification, to these writer including Giuseppe Garibaldi, believed they were a monarchy in the first place for a reason. They thought that separate kingdoms and territories would be beneficial for everyone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    10. What did the Italian city-state (ex. Venice & Genoa) leaders base their right to rule on that shares a commonality with contemporary U.S. politicians?…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince reflects the context of Florence’s limited military and economic power in a fragmented Italy and threatened by surrounding states and country…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unification of Italy Dbq

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who agreed that Italy should be unified argued that Italy would not survive in the separated states, would be vulnerable to invasions, and would ultimately be weaker overall. Giuseppe Mazzini, an attorney who was exiled from Piedmont and wanted Italy to be unified so that he could return to his home said, “Unity, because without unity there can be no true nation, and without unity there is no strength.” (DOC 1) People for unification believed the combining of Italy states would be beneficial in the end. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest from Piedmont, said, “The benefits Italy would gain from a political confederation under the moderating authority of the pontiff are beyond enumeration…would increase the strength of the various princes without damaging their independence; it would remove the causes of disruptive wars and revolutions at home, and make foreign invasions impossible. (DOC 3) Some civilians of these states also agreed that the unification of Italy would be just fine. Jessie White Mario, an English journalist who is obviously an opinionated individual being in the field of journalism said, “…Italy would have been free from foreigners, would have been free, independent, and united, had not monarchy stepped in and substituted the petty longings of dynastic ambition for the great national aim.” (DOC 9) On the other hand, some people felt that the unification of Italy would not bring success, but failure.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, more importantly in my opinion, the end of the war revealed that Italy lacked the diplomatically-savvy leaders because, as “the ruling coalition included many divergent points of view, her traditional system of government made this almost inevitable”.10 The public was confused about national interests and began to question whether the traditional system was really the best, be it the Liberals, the Socialists or the…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays