Preview

Island of Plenty Response

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Island of Plenty Response
Svetlana Feldman Professor Crowder SFELD5157@HOSTOS.CUNY.EDU March 26, 2012 Are We Selfish Or Can We Help? In “The Island of Plenty”, Montgomery emphasizes his article on social Darwinism. The United States should not share their resources with other parties to reduce the amount of hunger games going on. Other countries are in this difficult position because they are not capable of reproducing their products. The larger the population becomes, the more products are wasted. Once the population can be controlled then the resources would not become so scarce. “[s]ome of us have polluted the planet by reproducing too many of us” (399 Montgomery). The United States should help others in need because once the help stops serving others then there would be no help from others when needed. The Garden of Eden is known to be an imagery place of the Utopian world. The United States cannot be relatively compared to the Garden of Eden. Being a resident of The United States, it is not such a happy and free place. The United States is overpopulated with minorities from every place of the world. Other countries are over populated as well but with the citizens of their homeland. Once there might have been a theory that The United States was a pure place but now it is not so harmonious and peaceful as others preserve it to be. There might be enough products to support the individuals that live here but not enough power to stand alone. The United States us consuming a large amount of resources from other places. In order for The United States to receive general resources from other places, sharing theirs will help

1

them reproduce more. If there is a large amount of goods which is more than enough from one country then why not share them? The United States is a country built up with negligence, but Americans so greedy that they want everything for themselves? If The United States would not share their economic resources then the country would be set apart from other materials

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The increase in the number of population in poor countries is much higher than in rich countries over a given period of time. This means that while the population of poor countries is expanding massively, the proportion of rich countries consistently diminishes. Hardin presents the idea of "The Tragedy of The Commons'' and clarifies it as a negative impact on customers of shared resources around the globe. It has as of now happened in today's general public and infected our surroundings as well as helped increase overpopulation. The act of rich nations offering the poor some assistance resulted in making of The World Food Bank. Yet, Hardin claims this system stops the improvement of poor countries and gives them a chance to depend on rich nations when crisis happens. While attempting to discover an answer for this issue and help poor people, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations made the "Green Revolution" program, the objective of this program is to show poor countries how to develop "supernatural occurrence wheat" and "marvel rice." Hardin argures that this project helped spread of malignancy and over-trying so as to burden the earth; consequently, to spare individuals from starvation, different damages were made. Hardin convictions that movement is another push variable of the overpopulation issue on the grounds that it permits individuals to escape from poor countries and weight the biological system of rich nations. Therefore, in "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor," Garrett Hardin recommends that our planet could be protected by taking his advices, or else nothing will be left for the future…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In passage 8, author mainly uses the comparison which is a rhetorical strategy and method of organization in which a writer examines similarities or differences between two things. The article says that future of the world need children; however, there are some preconditions. ‘But it is with the nourished, educated, and loved children. It is not with the starving, uneducated, and ignored.’(Montgomery, Page 541) the purpose of Montgomery using comparison in this sentence is to tell audience that if there are too much children in the world, less resources can be shared with each child and there will be more uneducated and ignored children. But the fact is: our future needs children who are been taken good care of. With the comparison, the readers can understand the importance of birth controlling better. Cause no one wants to live in the terrible future. In passage 11, he also mentions that ‘if everyone shared equally, we would all be suffering from protein-deficiency brain damage-and that would probably be true even if we ate every last animal on earth.’(Montgomery, Page542).Montgomery compares personal interests - if we don’t share resource with others, on one hand, we wouldn’t encounter many potential dangers, on the other hand, we are able to have sufficient food for ourselves, for our children. Everyone wants to give their offspring best resources. Through comparisons, the tone of Montgomery can be passed to the audience strongly - the birth control and no sharing with others are substantial.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the first article, Garrett Hardin attempts to assert that there is no universal solution to the population problem. His supports this central thesis be explaining that in a world that has finite resources, the population must inherently also be finite. He also declares that the optimum population is less than the maximum. In order to take full advantage of each individuals potential, it is necessary to maximize “good per person” (which is a relative phrase; and to measure the values of the goods, a weighting system would have to be implemented).…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With several fonts of information embedded in this article from TIMES magazine, Olivia Waxman articulates the momentum in which American society is tuning on the issue of overpopulation. The consensus is, again, the need to control the birthrate, thus diminishing (or try to) population growth. One of the sources the author uses is Stanford entomologist Paul Ehrlich who argues that “it was time for a population-control movement. Without it, the world would face shortages of food, water and more.”…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    us dakota war

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The more people who are born the more resources you are going to use to help them survive.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason is that most people living in industrialized countries refuse to acknowledge the issue. They believe that lessening consumption will mean large sacrifices on their part, as they will forced to give up their comfortable way of life (Baltz, 1999, p. 214). This attitude shows that many are not willing to change their lifestyles, even if it means reducing inequality and suffering for thousands of people in developing countries. Effective altruists aim to work for the benefit of as many people as possible, especially of the poor in developing countries. Here, we can see that instead of recognizing that everyone deserves an equal share in the Earth’s resources, many consumers would rather prioritize themselves and protect their own interests at the cost of other people’s welfare.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lands of the earth are limited, and soon will be taken…” quoted from Minister Josiah Strong. Many Americans felt it was not only our responsibility and duty but it was also a command from God. Minister Strong argued that America was in a race with other nations to dominate the world and obtain resources that we needed. So because America claimed that it was their duty to uplift and “Christianize” the foreign people they used this as an argument for imperialism. As Charles Darwin states “In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment." America had gone into a state of “social Darwinism”, where they thought that the earth belong to the fit and strong, which in this case is America. And so, if U.S. wanted to survive in competition of modern states, it too would have to become an imperial power. According to Beveridge, "...and thanksgiving to Almighty God that He has marked us as His chosen people, henceforth to lead in the regeneration of the world..." This embarks that they were even told that America was the chosen people, and the people who would change the entire…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Island Research Paper

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cloning is a naturally occurring phenomenon, as well as a human induced process. A clone is a living organism deriving from another, with identical set of genes. A naturally occurring anthropological example of a clone would be twins, a set of individuals with identical DNA. A laboratory-induced clone would be stem cell production and animal cloning. In the movie The Island by Michael Bay, the concept of cloning is used as a life insurance policy to elongate the life of a natural born individual. This medical use of cloning has been under the experimental stage for quite sometime now and under ethical question. There are three different ways of cloning, recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history there has been many stipulations concerning our environment and how we as a population has reacted to its cause for such drastic and demanding changes over time. There has also been many areas that is said to be over populated because of the high birth rate across the United States and the world in such third world countries as Asia, Haiti and Nigeria. Stats has taught us that the united states make up of 6% of the world’s population, and consume 50% of it’s global resources. Social justice as well as logic suggest that US population should consume less. Let’s not forget that when the US started building a democracy after discovering the new world, there was the Native American population that roamed free in the wilderness across the US and tried to prevent the discovery of such a land. But unsuccessfully accomplished that task because of the Europeans quest for greed for profit that was obtained by more ownership of land to produce crops, building, expansion ect. With the help of free labor by African slaves that where brought just for that purpose alone more than three hundred years before they were freed due to a battle between North America and South America in which ended in the declaration of independence that was signed in 1865.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whatever produce man deserves they can get it at any store, be it crops we have grown, meats from animals we breed, or chemicals needed to produce pills. We are untouchable, and we can grow and provide for ourselves without limits, we believe there is no termination to the amount of intelligence, productivity and self-advancement that can be fulfilled. In recent years, evidence has shown that man's actions towards the environment is critical. First came global warming due to industrial activities that our modern civilization depends upon, then came species that are endangered or rare due to man having total control of land. Evidently, man’s culture is currently affecting the nature we live in, the current personification of humanity, which is currently at flaw, but man believe to be successful comes with a strand attached. We can choose to stay on the same path we are currently in until the world is destroyed. Most of us are aware of the effects industrialization has on the planet but part of humanity has given up hope that the world we live in would ever be saved and we lost interest in…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United states is a land of opportunity and we should be able to share these opportunities with others…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why are we not more like the Native Americans they believed in a circle of life you only take what you need you never over harvest and…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today I'll be reflecting my insight on a very critical issue rising in our global economy, that is to recognize “OVERPOPULATION IS BAD BUT OVER-CONSUMPTION IS WORSE”. You know it is very interesting how Dr. David Suzuki published this article in 1993 pointing this issue of over-consumption about 18 years ago, I only wish he could see how economy has taken over us in these 18 years. ( a drastic variation it has been ) His article “overpopulation is bad but over consumption is worse” is portraying the present situation very precisely. We often find ourselves remarking on the third world countries and how they are adding up to the global condition by overpopulating and most definitely the cause is their limited grasp on resources. Which is quite understandable of course not justified BUT what about our side of the world???…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) Furedi points out that we are being hypocrites by spending a lot on healthcare and trying to make sure that people can live as long as possible but also blaming ourselves as a source of the world’s problems and trying to minimize the population by carrying out birth control measures.(1) Furedi believes it is the Malthusians, such as Ehrlich and Ehrlich, that are the real problem as they promote inhuman practices such as birth control to be given such great lengths of attention.(1) Furedi discredits Ehrlich and Ehrlich ’ global warming concerns by stating that without human species, the issue would resolve by itself (2)and so the “obsession with natural limits distracts society from the far more creative search for solutions to hunger or poverty or lack of resources”(5). He also claims that Malthusians strongly lower people’s confidence in fighting future problems(5) by giving people immoral solutions such as stopping to reproduce altogether. Malthusians also enforce the use of contraception for women in poor countries by disguising the whole thing and calling it counseling about family planning which is mandatory for everyone to attend(3). Furedi wants people to start believing in themselves again and begin having faith in humanity as a whole. Furedi believes that people will never reach the “death rate solution” mentioned by Ehrlich and Ehrlich if they do not sacrifice humanity. According to Furedi, overpopulation should never have been given this much attention and spotlight in the first…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays