Preview

Is Profit the Only Business of Business?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Profit the Only Business of Business?
It is an ageless discussion on what the corporate social responsibility is for managers. Two models that discuss Corporate Social Responsibility are the Shareholder Model and stakeholder Models. The goal of this paper is to discuss these models, the general principals of corporate social responsibility, and end with some concluding thoughts.
It is an ageless discussion on what the corporate social responsibility is for managers. Two models that discuss Corporate Social Responsibility are the Shareholder Model and stakeholder Models. The goal of this paper is to discuss these models, the general principals of corporate social responsibility, and end with some concluding thoughts.
Stakeholder
Stakeholder
Shareholder Model
Shareholder Model
Alliance Model
Alliance Model
Concluding Arguments
Concluding Arguments
A discussion of the three models surrounding Corporate Social Responsibility
A discussion of the three models surrounding Corporate Social Responsibility
Outline
Outline is profit the only business of business? is profit the only business of business? The Stakeholder Model, that was developed my R. Edward Freeman, and states that collectivist ends can be attained without collectivist needs. It is important to distinguish a stakeholder from a stockholder. A stakeholder is any group or individual that has a vital interest in the actions of a specific corporation. The stockholder is in fact a stakeholder of the firm, but their interest is the share owned of the firm and how much money has been invested in the firm (Frey & Cruz-Cruz, 2009). The stakeholder theory looks at a firm as a series of groups with different relationships spread among the corporation. A stakeholder could be an internal organizational member, such as an employee, or an external, member; such as a customer or supplier Stakeholders has the potential to influence the company through words, deeds, and actions (Schneider, 2002). The stakeholder theory asks



References:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate social responsibility can simply be identified as a duty, which is not a legal obligation lately, under very much consideration by every multinationals, as well as the growing firm. The ongoing concern is meant to increase the awareness between the business Individuals, to implement and draw line which should clearly indicates that what social obligation an organization has towards the society.(Caroll,1970) (Caroll, Archie, B.(1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility is towards the moral management of organization stakeholder.…

    • 2712 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s modern business world, commerce implements operation, drive and manner notions with endorsement and adoption of corporate social responsibility as a matter of course (David Henderson 2004). The stakeholder groups, for instance, governments, communities, suppliers, employees, customers and stockholders persistently claim administrators to dedicate capitals to corporate social responsibility (McWilliams and Siegel 2001, 117). Despite the fact, strategic corporate social responsibility is far more selective on being a standing corporation rate citizen and also addressing the social issues that the corporate creates (Micheal E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer 2006).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Auditing Research

    • 5043 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by Corporate Social Responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 16-22.…

    • 5043 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A stakeholder refers to "any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the firm's objective. Obviously the organization operates under supervision of a large social system, which includes shareholders, employees, customers, communities and various interest groups. Indicating the provision of information that can be useful for the sustainable operation of an enterprise is the crucial aim of stakeholder theory, comprising ethical and managerial branch.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Donaldson, T & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management. 20 (3), p70-71.…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stockholder vs Stakeholder

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages

    * Wheeler, David; Maria Sillanpää (1997). The Stakeholder Corporation: a blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. London: Pitman. ISBN 0-273-62661-2.…

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is more than one definition for corporate social responsibility. One way in which it can be defined is the obligation of organization management to make decisions and take actions that will enhance the welfare and interests of society as well as the organization (Daft, 2003). In other words, corporate actions have social implications, and managers have a responsibility to act in ways which benefit society as well as the organization (Body, 2005). The difficulty that most companies of today are facing is that investing money in order to become more socially responsible may benefit one of the company’s…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a topic has received the attention of organisations and managers as a whole. The 1950s marked the start of the modern era of CSR for managers, where Howard R. Bowen (1953) defines social responsibilities in his publication as the businesses’ duty to make decision and follow principles that are acceptable to society. However, Milton Friedman (1970) argued that social responsibilities is for people not businesses, he claims that the only responsibility business managers should have is to use all their resources to maximise profit and increase shareholder’s wealth (Friedman, York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, pp. 32-34).…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lee, M-D.P., 2007. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), pp.53-73.…

    • 3954 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Corporate social responsibility refers to the moral and legal accountability on the part of individuals and corporations towards others and social institutions. Those in leadership positions must be aware of social issues and problems to establish laudable goals and ensure practices are fair and just. As decision makers the managers must treat others with dignity and respect, must ensure that the integrity of sport is maintained, and must pledge to do what is best from organisational and communal standpoints ( DeSeni & Rosenberg, 2003)…

    • 3830 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stakeholder theories have grown in number and type since the term stakeholder was first coined in 1963. According to R. Edward Freeman, whose work in stakeholder theory is well known, the stakeholder concept was originally defined as including "those groups without whose support the organization would cease to exist." As a part of management theory and practice, stakeholder theory takes a number of forms. Descriptively, some research on stakeholder theory assumes that managers who wish to maximize their firm's potential will take broader stakeholder interests into account. This gives rise to a number of studies on how managers, firms, and stakeholders do in fact interact. Normatively, other management studies and theories will discuss how corporations ought to…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the Statement

    • 1655 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Corporate responsibility is a term that suggests, with evidence that, businesses have considered their impact on society for a long time. Whereas, in recent years it has become an increasingly important subject as social and environmental harm caused by some organizations has come to the public’s attention. This term is made up of a number of morals and rules that increase chances of the competetiveness of an organisation. This is done by taking into consideration and focusing on four main groups of the hierarchy which consist of: customers, employees, shareholders, and communities. These focusses are made from a number of points which include: legal and financial compliance, business ethics, brand management, environmental affairs, and public an community affairs.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    7401 assigment

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (1): Stakeholder theory is about identifying the groups who are stakeholders in a corporation and need to be managed. It emphasizes that the company should not only pursue the interest of the shareholders (not only act for the financial benefits), but also run for the benefit of both their owners and stakeholders. It suggests the purpose of the firm is to serve broader societal interests beyond economic value creation for shareholders (Margolis & Walsh, 2001). The essential idea of stakeholder theory is that organizations that manage the relationships of the stakeholders effectively will survive longer and improve performance (Freeman, 2003). Stakeholder theory is recognizing that organizations hold responsibilities towards other stakeholders beyond their stockholders (shareholders).…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Csr Case Study

    • 6604 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Abstract: Starting from the times of barter system to today’s modern era of plastic money, the mankind has trodden a remarkably long path. Undoubtedly “profitability” has always been the driving force and an undercurrent behind all this development; but as every coin has two facets; growing cut throat competition and business rivalries started taking heavy toll on the quality, transparency, environment and the society in general endangering the peaceful coexistence of business and society. The businesses houses started realizing that they would have to rise over and above the profitability and take care of all those associated with their survival in the society directly or indirectly. This realization resulted into the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This research paper moves around developing an understanding about the corporate social responsibility (CSR), delving into its concept and finding out its scope taking the case study of the TATA Group under Mr. Ratan Tata who has exemplified the sense of responsibility towards the upliftment of common masses and protection of the environment and development of the nation. Keywords: Corporate citizenship, Corporate social responsibility, Employee, Productivity, Profitability, Society, Stakeholders. I. Introduction…

    • 6604 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility has changed since the early 20th century and it has never been a straightforward. The importance of CSR arose with the role of leadership, how a leader can manage the company with an ethical approach to society and what can be done for the environment. Furthermore, the focus of CSR has changed the behavior of organizations, not the role of leadership anymore. It created a debate about what companies should do for society. Subsequently, the structure of CSR places less stress on organizational behaviours and more on the responsibility (Blowfield and Murray 2011, p.7). However, the most well-known and accepted model of CSR is Carroll four-part model, which he defined as “ CSR includes the economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic expectations placed on organization by society at a given point of time” (Carroll 2009, cited in Crane and Matten 2010, p.53).…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays