Preview

Internal & External Possessors

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5104 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internal & External Possessors
Term Paper
Internal & External Possessors
A Contrastive Analysis of Humorous Aspects in English and German
Module: Sprachwissenschaftliche Methoden und Englischunterricht
Course: English in Contrast Mondays, 2 to 4 p.m.
Lecturer: Dr. George Smith

submitted by Nadja Degen born 22 November 1988 major Englisch, MA of Ed. minor Latein, MA of Ed.

Content

1. Introduction 2
2. Hypothesis 3
3. Internal & external possessor constructions in English and German 4
4. The incongruity theory 5
5. Humor and translation 6
6. Verbal humor in English possessor constructions 7 6.1 Verbal humor in internal possessor constructions I 7 6.2 Verbal humor in internal possessor constructions II 9
7. Verbal humor in German possessor constructions 11 7.1 Verbal humor and idiomatic expressions 11 7.2 Verbal humor and the animacy hierarchy 13
8. Conclusion 15
9. Bibliography 16

1. Introduction
Speaking a language is an activity governed by rules and conventions. Many of these are such that they may be violated to a certain degree, often with amusing results. Therefore, studying the resulting incongruities leads to an identification of rules and conventions the existence or influence of which may have passed unnoticed but for attention to their violation (Goldstein 1).

Verbal humor, that is humor “expressed by means of a linguistic system” (Attardo 96), employs diverse strategies. One strategy, which is frequently applied as the above quotation admits, is the violation of linguistic rules as a trigger for humorous aspects. The resulting incongruities emphasize the regulatory framework of the respective language. An analysis of linguistic structures underlying verbal humor can, therefore, deliver deep insights into the workings of a language. This relation between linguistic correctness and humor has further

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Attardo, S. (2001). Humor and Irony in Interaction:. IOS Press. [Online]. Retrieved at: www.emergingcommunication.com [April 11th 2011].…

    • 15087 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humor - Humor is apparent in his section headings, “The Prince of Prescriptivists”, “Linguists Spring into Action” (MacNeil, page 307) and in the examples that he includes “In downtown Pittsburgh—pronounced “dahntahn”—the question, ‘Did you eat yet?’ sounds like ‘Jeet jet?’”(MacNeil, page 312). He uses humor to keep the audience's attention, so he can insert more sensitive and educational topics.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be analysing a transcript from a Newsnight show featuring Jeremy Paxman, Baroness Amos and Dizzee Rascal. I will be talking about the effects of choices in the use of standard and non-standard forms of spoken language.…

    • 908 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this project, you will select a socio-linguistic group—a specific community of language users. Your task is to observe 1) the arena(s) of language use, and 2) record examples of miscommunication.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural differences - different cultures interpret non-verbal and verbal messages and humour in different ways. Assumptions about ethnic group, gender, disability and other groupings can lead to stereotyping and misunderstanding.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Incongruity Theory humor in philosophy asserts that we laugh because we have been expecting something to happen, but then that thing that we were expecting does not happen. “This approach was taken by James Beattie, Immanuel Kant, Søren Kierkegaard, Arthur Schopenhauer, and many later philosophers and psychologists. It is now the dominant theory of humor in philosophy and psychology” (Morreall, 10). The incongruity theory of humor is the most widely accepted theory of humor, possibly because it covers the widest scope of experience.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overgeneralization in language – the incorrect application of all language rules to aspects which do not require those rules…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Clark, M. (1987). Humor and Incongruity. In The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. New York: State University of New York Publishing,.…

    • 2697 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humor is not a tool that can be used limitlessly as there are certain societal boundaries that prohibit jokes from exceeding levels of acceptable humor. This kind of prohibition is known as a taboo. In unit five of Alison Ross’s textbook, The Language of Humour, Ross discusses on these common taboos: sex, excreta, death, and religion while also explaining how jokes sometimes break taboos, but at the same time keep limits to where these jokes are accepted by society.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changing the way we speak is an important way of building bridges in different social situations. Not responding to new contexts or people can cause problems. In the hands of comedians that means laughter.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Yerlikaya (2007), affiliative and self-enhancing humor styles are included in the “harmonious” category, whereas aggressive and self-defeating humor styles are included the “inharmonious” category. Both the self-enhancing and affiliative humor styles generally tap the positive or adaptive aspects of sense of humor, whereas the self-defeating and aggressive humor styles generally tap the negative or maladaptive aspects of sense of humor. It is possible to employ any of these humor styles in combination and to varying degrees. Individuals can use a particular style of humor in one situation and another style in a different situation (Erozkan, 2009).…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conception Of Ownership

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ownership is defined as the act, state, or right of possessing something, although, in our minds the idea of ownership varies with the person (Ownership). Throughout history, the perception of ownership has been viewed differently depending on circumstances including time. For example, during the beginning of exploration times there were issues with claiming land--white men thinking they were superior they believed they had right to other’s land. Psychologically, the human mind has developed a sense of entitlement. Ownership over time has been perceived as land settlement, material object possession, and the control of a person over another.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, the project does not show the linguistic workings of jokes that cause them to be funny to us. What factors enable people to understand jokes? What prevents people from understanding jokes? What factors improve or deteriorate the delivery of jokes? Do these factors differ per language or conversation type? This essay will attempt to answer these questions by discussing the linguistic factors that influence the delivery and understanding of jokes in different types of conversation in English and Dutch, using Clark’s common ground theory and joint construal principle and Grice’s cooperative principle.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Term Paper

    • 3632 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Sarcasm, verbal irony, paradox, and pun are devices sometimes used to show humor. Heck, a simile or metaphor can also establish humor. One of my favorite funny lines from a book is a simile. Somewhere in the "Hitchhiker's Guide" series, Douglas Adams described a woman failing to fly by saying "She…

    • 3632 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stylistic Analysis

    • 10234 Words
    • 41 Pages

    References: Burns, Anne (1998). Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 102–123. Candlin, Christopher (1991). General editor’s preface. In Language as Discourse, Michael McCarthy and Ronald Carter, vii–x. London and New York: Longman. Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy (1995). Grammar and spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16: 141–158. Cathcart, Ruth (1989). Authentic discourse and the survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly 23: 105–126. Firth, Alan (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 237–259. Firth, Alan and Johannes Wagner (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81: 285–300. Gardner, Rod and Johannes Wagner (eds.) (to appear). Second Language Talk: Studies of Native and Non-native Interaction. Godard, Danielle (1977). Same setting, different norms: Phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society 6: 209–219. Hatch, Evelyn (1992). Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heritage, John (1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, John Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hopper, Robert (1989). Sequential ambiguity in telephone openings: “What are you doin”. Communication Monographs 56: 240–252. — (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.…

    • 10234 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics