Preview

In 1862 Bismarck Said, 'the Great Question of the Day Will Not Be Settled by Speeches and Majority Decisions...'

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2045 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In 1862 Bismarck Said, 'the Great Question of the Day Will Not Be Settled by Speeches and Majority Decisions...'
In 1862 Bismarck said, 'The great question of the day will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions...'
What were 'the great questions of the day' for Bismarck, and how did he settle them up to 1871?

The significance of Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schönhausen for world history is indisputable. Bismarck, a German Junker who was born on April 1st 1815 and died on July 30st 1898, is often referred to as the first modern politician of world history and it is very important to know what kind of man he was to understand his motives and what his 'great questions of the day' were.
While his father was from an old noble family his mother was only from a common one with no special background and history. She always told him that he needed to burst out of the status his family was in. He wanted to make history and wanted to be considered as one of the best politicians in history and not an underpart. It is not clear if his national feelings were for Germany or Prussia.

The experience he gained for his later political career came from his early times as politician which he spend in Frankfurt, Russia and France, partially as ambassador for Germany. The most significant step in his political career was maybe when he was made chief minister of Prussia under Wilhelm I. His relation to the King and later the Kaiser was so good that he was much trusted by Wilhelm I. In the later years of his career, during the unification, Bismarck really ruled the country.

Even though many Germans wanted a nation and something that was secure and powerful they did not see Bismarck as somebody who did want to unite Germany but as somebody who wanted to increase the power and influence of Prussia. But that is the reason why the answer for the first part of the question in the heading is very clear. The quote about 'the great questions of the day' was taken from Bismarck's famous 'Iron and Blood' speech (also 'Blood and Iron speech) and represented most certainly the unification of



Bibliography: History notes Notes on the server http://zeus.zeit.de/text/1998/31/Fuenf_Schuesse_auf_Bismarck http://www.military-quotes.com/otto-von-bismarck.htm http://www.deutsche-schutzgebiete.de/deutscher_krieg.htm www.zdf.de (mediatehk)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    HIST 531

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Leo von Caprivi- Was an German General who succeded Bismarck as Chancelor. He sepperated the office of Prussian Minister President and chancellor of the Reich which Bismarck previously held simultaneously. Under Caprivi’s system secretaries of state were given greater freedom and were allowed audiences with the Kaiser. Further Caprivi introduced the “New Course” which changed foreign and domestic policy towards conciliation with social democrats and a pro-british policy away from the Bismark policy. Caprivi was an ex‐military man who, as a result of this, Wilhelm II was quick to trust. He instigated his own ‘New Course’ – which aimed to ‘kill Socialism with kindness’. He wanted to allow some of the Socialists wanted, including re‐introducing Free Trade and extending the social welfare reforms put in place by Bismarck.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “ He believes that war is the answer. He fights these conflicts through violence, and suggests the Germans to fight and defend themselves. Germans were required to pay reparations for World War 1. In Document…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An important factor of Hitler becoming Chancellor in January 1933 was his personality, Adolf Hitler was a genius; it took overwhelming intelligence to come from such a poor background to the Chancellor of Germany, but he managed it suggesting that he was a stubborn man and doesn’t stop until he gets what he wants. Hitler was a very popular man, which helped him make the public like him. In doing this he was able to make them listen to what he had to say, he was a very powerful speaker and the speeches he wrote were very inspiring which filled the listeners with aspiration. His personality links to every one of the point I am going to make in this essay because if he didn’t put his twist on things he would never have done them, he turned the Depression into a beam of hope for Germany. This factor defiantly helped Hitler in his rise to power because his personality is who he is, his stubbornness and arrogance defiantly helped him become one of the most listened to men in Germany.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    education. It was in Berlin that he first became aware of a different side of life. Hapgood took…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890).…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time he was a very modern, up to date person. He took advantage of the available technology. For example he was one of the first German politicians to fly in an aeroplane. He almost brain washed the country, by giving them hope of a better future, and shifting the blame of the nation’s state onto a common enemy: the Jewish population. The Jews were an easy target, mainly because the majority of them were fairly rich. Because the war was blamed on the Jews, the rest of Germany felt less guilty about losing the war.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bismarck almost single-handedly unified Germany and brought it to one of its most prosperous points in history. Some may say Bismarck was a diamond in the rough. After all, he came from a very unusual background but that did not stop him from achieving greatness even in his younger years. Otto von Bismarck was born the first of april in 1815 in the german…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Berlin, March 7-Germany today cast off the last shackles fastened upon her by the Treaty of Versailles when Adolf Hitler, as commander-in-chief of the Reich defense forces, sent his new battalions into the Rhineland's demilitarized zone.... "After three years of ceaseless battle," Hitler concluded, "I look upon this day as marking the close of the struggle for…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Adolf Hitler

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hitler’s political abilities were outstanding. In order to attract and unite the German citizens, he used his personality, propaganda and wisely planned his speeches. Hitler used simple and concise language during his speeches so all citizens will understand him more and hopefully support him. He also had strong propaganda slogans painted promises of an alluring future for Germany. His first and most significant point was the “rebirth” of Germany to after the catastrophic Treaty of Versailles, which would be abolished when he seized power along with the other reparations. He promised to improve economic prosperity by changing the strategy that the current government used. A German whom had given Hitler…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays