Preview

I See No Reason Why The Gunpowder Treason Should Ever Be Forgot

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
I See No Reason Why The Gunpowder Treason Should Ever Be Forgot
“…I See no Reason, Why the Gunpowder Treason Should Ever be Forgot.”
I hate being cheated. Although I have had several hundred people to help me with my job, I still hate it. Kane, Hitler, Booth. These are just a few of those who helped me. Even if I did claim their lives in the end, I am thankful to them.
One who tried (but failed) is Guy Fawkes. I avenged myself by killing him too. That’s my job. No one lives forever. I am sorry to tell you this, but it is true.
The tale that we commemorate is well known, how a bunch of Catholic conspirators sought to blow up King James I and Parliament in 1605. Convention says that the group wanted to reestablish the Catholic religion in England. I was alongside Fawkes and his companions the
…show more content…
Fawkes was born in 1570 York England. He joined the Catholic Church while he was still young and his religious passion led him to leave Protestant England and serve in the Spanish army in the Netherlands from 1593 to 1604.
Robert Catesby asked him to return to England to take part in the plot. Because of his experience as a soldier and his reputation for courage and coolness, he was entrusted with actually carrying out the plan. He was an amazing man, Catesby. Too bad his wish wasn’t fulfilled.
The Catholic protesters rented a cellar that was directly beneath the House of Lords and stashed 26 barrels of gunpowder, covered with straw and faggots. Then an anonymous letter warning the Catholic Lord, Monteagle, to stay away from the opening of Parliament blew the game. The Royal Guards were sent into the cellar, but no one was found. They waited in silence and
…show more content…
He was on the rack, on the wheel and some other ghastly things that I just love. As he was screaming in pain and agony, I was whispering in his ear. It only made him yell and scream louder.
“Never get caught, Fawkes, or this will happen,” I said. “You are learning this the hard way.” By November 12, most of the conspirators had been killed or taken to the Tower of London.
Although the Gunpowder plot was meant to murder King James I and the members of the House of Parliament , it killed a whole different group of people, including Fawkes himself. And I know that he will never forget the day he was executed. He was a good man, and he is often toasted as “the last man to enter Parliament with honorable intentions.”
He was tried and found guilty before a special commission (Jan. 27, 1606) and was executed opposite the Parliament building. Before he died, he had one last thing to say: “Remember, remember the Fifth of November, Gunpowder, treason and plot. I see no reason why Gunpowder treason and plot should ever be forgot.” He was hanged, drawn and quartered in the bloody fashion of the day. I love those

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Coxy=Needs+Provides Help

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3 .From reading sources B and source C, I think that they do not agree with each other because it says in source B that ‘He said his plan was to blow parliament House with gunpowder and would give my consent. I told him “Yes”.’ This means Thomas Wintour was part of the plot Catesby put him into this. So Thomas Wintour was part of this as well. The sources do not agree with each other because source B says they only need to ‘destroy parliament’ and in source C it says ‘Catholics must even kill the king to help their region’.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Haymarket bombing occurred on May 4, 1886. The leaders of the labor movement in Chicago called for a public meeting in Haymarket Square after police had shot and killed two workers at the McCormick Reaper Works plant on May 3rd. In The Trial of the Haymarket Anarchists: Terrorism and Justice in the Gilded Age Timothy Messer-Kruse uncovers the truth about the Haymarket bombing and the trial that followed. He walks his readers through the bombing, the investigation, the trial, the execution, and the pardon. In preparation for this book, he studied the complete original transcript of the trial, instead of solely depending on the Abstract of Record and other historian’s interpretations, as most of his predecessors had done. In doing so he discovered and effectively proved that contemporary understandings about this historical event are utterly flawed.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of nonconforming Catholics such as Guy Fawkes and Robert Catesby plotted against their King. They planned to commit regicide by placing gunpowder under the Parliament. Nevertheless, they were caught and all executed. After the Gunpowder Plot failed, James I passed harsher rules such as the Popish Recusants Act (denying Pope’s authority over the King). This rule included the Puritans who also wanted change and reform within the church such as the abolishment of wedding rings and the term priest.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One chilly night on March 5th, 1770 war broke out between the Patriots and the Loyalists. It occurred on King Street in Boston, Massachusetts. Before this event took place, the British had decided to tax the colonists for many manufactured items acquired through trade. This caused an outrage in the populace of Boston, mostly for the impoverished people. Ever since then, the colonists have been boycotting and protesting against these inequitable laws. Then on this day the Patriots and Loyalists were bickering when a shot was fired into the crowd of the Loyalists and then someone had yelled “Fire!” and in the end, few Patriots were killed and some injured. This anger the Colonists greatly and they deserved justice, this night will always be remembered…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story "John Adams and the Coming of the Revolution”, author David McCullough discusses how John Adams was asked to defend the British soldiers in court of the soldier’s accusation of man slaughter, following the Boston Massacre. Being such a problematic case that could ruin his reputation, John Adams accepted to defend the soldiers because of his experience in difficult cases, and his strong principles and beliefs. John Adam’s reputation did not even tarnish because of how skillfully he handled the case gaining the respect of the people of Boston.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Becket's Influence

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The king was angered and uttered words which were said to have the intention of killing Becket. On the time of his assassination, knights came with weapons which they kept under a tree outside under cloaks before entering the cathedral where they challenged Becket ot head to Winchester and give accounts of his excommunication to the opponents but he refused. The knights went outside and rushed back with their weapons and killed him. After Thomas Becket’s death, he was canonized by the pope and he was taken to the…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the American Revolution, many events occurred that not only demonstrated the rising tensions between Britain and the colonies, but stoked the revolutionary spark in America. The Boston Massacre was one of these pivotal events, occurring on March 5, 1770 when an altercation between British soldiers and Boston rebels resulted in the death of five Boston men. There is much controversy as to which party incited the violence, but ultimately the Boston Massacre was a result of the Bostonians’ desire to break away from British control, with the British soldiers only acting in self-defense.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Historic Timeline." Boston Massacre Historical Society. Boston Massacre Historical Society, n.d. Web. 30 Oct 2012. .…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soldiers scrambled to their places, eager to win the battle.The soldiers sloppily poured in the gunpowder in their guns, loaded them, and began to shoot at the barracks of the Hessians. BANG! Bodies were thrown to the ground, surrounded by blood, one of which was Col. Johann Rall of the Hessians. The Hessians tried to fight back, but failed to. In the end, it was the underdog Patriots who won.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    March fifth, 1770 was a gruesome culmination of high tensions between the British forces and colonists inhabiting Boston. There is no doubt that this was one of the most appalling displays of bloodshed in history; but who is to blame for the instigation of this deplorable event? I believe that it was the British soldiers of the 29th regiment who initiated the Boston Massacre. Although the soldiers were somewhat provoked by the crowd on king street and by the ropewalk workers, the soldiers had a responsibility, and were duty-bound to keep peace, not to kill innocent civilians. The British also had an irresponsible, hot headed motive behind their fighting and firing: revenge. If the British hadn't sought out revenge on the Bostonians for the ropewalk fights, the bloody events that followed may never have happened.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British marched to Concord to seize gunpowder and to detain Hancock and Adams. This failed miserably. Both Adams and Hancock escaped and not much gunpowder was seized. The American’s had…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later after the Massacre still on March 5, 1770 a mob of American colonists gathers at the Customs House in Boston and begins taunting the British soldiers guarding the building. Well I know that the colonist probably shouldn’t have rebelled like that afterwards, but you would have to think if someone you knew and loved got killed you would be pretty mad and would probably do something like that in that time. It would not help if you did not…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    New York Burning

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The plot first began to unravel in February of 1741 with a robbery. On February 26, 1741 a young English sailor by the name of Christopher Wilson went to a shop owned by Robert Hogg. While paying for his purchase he spotted where the money was kept. He then went to John Hughson’s tavern to talk to Hughson and three black men: Caesar, Prince, and Cuffee. Together they came up with a plan to rob Robert Hogg’s store. On…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics