How do they fit into his overall argument?
As a means of fully understanding the argument brought forward by Hume’s, one must understand certain key words used. According to Merriam Webster dictionary online coherence can be defined as “logically or aesthetically ordered or integrated, having clarity or intelligibility, having the quality of holding together”; and constancy is “the quality of staying the same : lack of change, the quality of being loyal to a person or belief, steadfastness of mind under duress”. Constance and coherence are biological dispositions, wired into the very fabric of our mind. The mechanism of constancy and coherence, as described by Hume …show more content…
I agree with Hume when he presented the idea of out constancy and coherence exist but I am yet to understand the term external world. I do believe however, that Hume made some very irrational assumptions when he said that the imagination is flawed. I believe that humans ability to imagine is one of the main contributor to human’s survival for many centuries. Hume states our imagination is faulty, breaks and combines idea, thus forming new ones. This now leads me to ask the question what exactly leads our imagination. Is our imagination lead by association, by contiguity, by resemblance or even by Illusion? If I cannot presently answer these questions then all the things I thought I truly knew and understood I do not anymore. Are most of the concepts and subject matter that once governed my behave could all be a fabrication of my imagination. As I reflect on the writing presented to me by Hume I think back to the question that we had once spoken about during class regarding what is your “true Self’? Hume study does help me to understand a lot about things we never rationally observed throughout our lives before. I can say that most of Hume’s writings are philosophically unjustified for he believed that he gave an accurate account of how humans arrive at the idea of