Preview

David Hume's Version Of Empiricism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
324 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume's Version Of Empiricism
Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses. Synthetic propositions can pose a problem since they can be untrue. An example is the sun. We can say that it will rise tomorrow—which is likely to happen because we have experienced it before. However, it is not impossible that it will not rise. We don’t know that this will definitely happen. All we really know is that “First X happens, then Y happens” (93), and in our experience events like X are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    If death is the perpetual and permanent end of our existence, the question comes up, if suicide is morally right or wrong. Should death even be feared? Suicide rates are increasing, in fact, 2015; there was a suicide rate of 11.4 per 100,000 people, or in perspective, 800,000 in the world. My standpoint on suicide is that it is morally acceptable to do it under any circumstances.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume argues that all a priori knowledge is of relations of ideas, and so analytic. All knowledge of synthetic propositions, matters of fact, is a posteriori. It depends either on present experience or causal…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This then influenced A J Ayer who claimed in his publication of ‘Language, Truth and Logic’ that there are only two kinds of proposition being the truths known by definition, and the truths known by reference to sense…

    • 1272 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Things that constitute Matters of Fact can be rejected without that rejection resulting in a contradiction. In short, these objects of human reason are not certain and can not be derived from logically or rationally reflecting on a concept. With this being said, Matters of Fact can be understood to be those things that are a posteriori, which means knowledge or justifications that can is dependent upon experience or empirical evidence. An example of a Matter of Fact is the statement that Earth is the third planet from the sun. One can not know this fact by simply reflecting on Earth and the solar system. There is nothing about the Earth or the solar system that is contingent upon the Earth to be the third plant from the sun. As a result, no one can know that the Earth is the third planet from the sun without viewing with a telescope that this happening is the case. Another example of this is the statement that it is raining outside. One can not simply reflect on the concept of rain to conclude that it is raining outside. Hence, in order to know that it is raining outside one has to go to the door or window to observe that it is raining outside. In addition to this, if someone where to reject the fact that it is raining outside, that rejection has an equal ability of being true or false upon that person’s observation of it raining outside. Though…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BeckerKevinE2Phil100F2014

    • 1326 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Empiricism, or the belief that knowledge is achieved through the senses, was a popular belief amongst some of the greatest modern philosophers. Perhaps the most prominent Empiricists were John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, all of whom are regarded as some of the most influential philosophers of the last 500 years. Each of those philosophers can be considered Empiricists due to the importance of experience throughout their philosophical principles. More specifically, Locke's empirical views can be seen in his idea of the primary and secondary qualities of an object. Berkeley's empiricism is evident in his critique of Locke's concept of abstract ideas. Lastly, Hume can be considered as the most consistent empiricist of the group as he did not waver from experience being the source of knowledge and at the root of reasoning. His views are evident in his concept of humans having perceptions and impressions and his idea of “self”.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the "argument from design" put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume Philosophy Paper

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume was an early 18th century philosopher that is best known for covering a variety of theories. He covered that reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, moral distinctions are not derived from reason and moral distinctions are direct from the moral sentiments [Treatise of Human Nature, 11]. “Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them” [T 2.3.3 p. 414] in his work A Treatise of Human Nature.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hume’s theory of the mind owes a great debt to John Locke’s ideas. Hume names the basic contents of the mind as “perceptions,” as what Locke described as “whatsoever the mind perceives in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, thought or understanding.” Hume divides perceptions into impressions and ideas. The difference between the two are marked by a difference of forcefulness and vivacity, so that impressions relate roughly to “feeling” as ideas relate to “thinking.” “Feeling” here should be understood broadly, and Hume divides impressions into those of “sensation” and those of “reflection.” Impressions of sensation derive from our senses, impressions of reflection derive from our experience of…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wetenschapsleer

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (1) All evidence bearing on synthetic statements derives from sense perception, which are true by definition (analytic)…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I will analyze philosophical and psychological approach to the economic issues by David Hume, which have played a significant influence on the formation of classical economics, and especially on the work of another great philosopher Adam Smith.…

    • 4390 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Empirical Methods

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Starting with the origins of empiricism, Aristotle was the first person to introduce the theory of the ‘tabula rasa’ which means ‘blank slate’. He believed that we are born without mental content and that all of our knowledge comes from experience through our five senses. About a thousand years later in the 11th century came ‘Avicenna’ and he emphasised the importance of observation in making universal laws. The most famous of all was probably Francis Bacon he was even known as the ‘father’ of the empiricist tradition. Around his time philosophy used ‘deductive reasoning’ to understand the natural world but Bacon introduced the idea of ‘inductive reasoning’. Inductive reasoning involves repeated observation to determine facts. Empiricism in Britain involved three very influential men and they included John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume. John Locke, the originator of British empiricism, strongly believed in the concept of ‘tabula rasa’.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays