Preview

The Science of Human Cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Science of Human Cloning
Scientists are either very close at being able to clone human beings or scientists have already done it. Human cloning has already become illegal or restricted in a variety of degrees in several countries. The film the island shows how the science can go terribly wrong.

Human life should be left to nature for several reasons. First, they make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. Human organ transplants are used from clones and might increase in the market. Also, when we start cloning, people will make a large amount of certain types of human cloning. They make clones for their health. They will just make it and soon kill it. This may not happen. In this film, clones believe they can go to the island, but it means they will die. For example, clone of Michael Jordon says "no, I don't want to die." We can see that they don't treat the clones like human.

Second, the clients pay lots of money and get internal organs for their health from the clones. They are really expansive when you want to make clones. I think we don't need to make clones by paying lots of money. Human life is worth more than money. I think human clones can't assess the value of money, because they are same as human.

Last, clones are human too. They are not just products. They can have feeling like human do. They have dignity, so we have to respect them. In this film, the people brainwash the minds of the clones. They are repeatedly told "You're special, you have a very special purpose in life", but the clones just work and wear only white clothes. It's unfair, because they are human too, but they are prisoned in a limited place.

For these reasons, I am against human cloning. We can't let people make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. A lot of people worry that cloned people would not have full rights, since they are just copies. I find this reasoning absolutely ridiculous, since a person is a person despite their genetic source or of artificially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clones could be seen as less than animals compared with non-clones” (Quinonez, blog.udemy.com). When I was reading I read that cloning is good for one good reason, to harvest the animal's organs. This idea is so inhumane, according (toblog.udemy.com) “While the cloning of body organs can be a great asset to extending human life, it could also cause a lot of malpractice. This could lead to a rise in malpractices within society.” First, scientist create these disgusting creatures and steal their organs for the purpose of human's life, that is just…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the technology available in todays society we now have the ability clone a species, even though it is not accepted by the majority of society. This does prevent a major question do we as Humans have the right to clone a species? Some people say no because it goes against natural selection, if a species was to weak to survive then for the good of the remainder of the world then it does not survive. There is also the possibility like in the movie that even though we think we know everything about this clone things will adapt and evolve to survive such as the dinosaurs evolving to reproduce while they were all females.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some people today that need a kidney or heart any organ. There is some hospital that don’t have organs to replaces. That why people thinking that the more clone we have the better it is for the people who need the organ. The clone has the right to live and have dreams not only as organs donor because the clones are also human. The scientist must have to make the clones with Human DNA. 18 years ago, my mom give birth to me am I a clone? No, I not clone I’m a human just like the student in Hailshaw. Also, maybe it not good idea to use the clone’s organ it may affect the human body. For example, if a scientist did something wrong in the process of making the clones then using their organs to replace the other human organs that small mistake can affect the human body. The human can be created a new disease and spread the disease outside of the world. It can be dangerous to kid and it may kill them. That why I think the guardians should treat the clones like real…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Island Research Paper

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cloning is a naturally occurring phenomenon, as well as a human induced process. A clone is a living organism deriving from another, with identical set of genes. A naturally occurring anthropological example of a clone would be twins, a set of individuals with identical DNA. A laboratory-induced clone would be stem cell production and animal cloning. In the movie The Island by Michael Bay, the concept of cloning is used as a life insurance policy to elongate the life of a natural born individual. This medical use of cloning has been under the experimental stage for quite sometime now and under ethical question. There are three different ways of cloning, recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a few ways scientists think human cloning could work. Researching and testing is expensive and it’s dangerous. “Theoretically, a cloned human embryo could be implanted in a uterus and allowed to develop into a fetus, infant, child, and so on.” (Stark)…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal cloning is very costly and not worth it. The costs, according to the Cloning Fact Sheet is in excess of over 7 billion dollars. And they have yet to produce an animal who has not died within a short period of time. Cloning is costly and a lot of the tax dollars paid are going to it…and not even showing much for it. Dolly the sheep was attempted 276 times before she was finally cloned, and even then she died of a strange lung disease developed only in a short period of time. Close to 3 million dollars on a sheep that lived a shorter lifetime than a goldfish, you have to ask yourself is it really worth it?…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analytical Brief Cloning

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cloning is difficult and results are not guaranteed. If scientists make a mistake in the early stages of the cloning process, the clone will no longer be identical. The clone that was created to help in the medical field, for example, will no longer be used for the scientific research. In addition, clones are more likely than their original to develop problems, such as infections, tumors, and other disorders. Typically, clones do not live as long as other creatures produced naturally, so it is as if scientists spent years and thousands of dollars for something that would not last long on Earth. They do not age as other creatures, and scientists have not been able to gather enough data to determine the life of a clone. Sometimes, clones mysteriously die, just as Australia’s first cloned sheep. One day, it “appeared healthy and energetic,” (Cloning Fact Sheet) but it died that very day. There were no signs of illnesses or any other problems, and the reason for death was never…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are people who believe that cloning should be allowed. One of the reasons is that parents can have control in their reproductive lives. Children should be valued by who they are, and parents don’t have the right to choose the physical characteristics or even take away the identities of their children. As a result, cloned children will see themselves as an object but not as a person. Another reason is the possibility of cloning organs to save lives. This argument I see it very insufficient because cloned organs can have some defects and cause some damage in a person’s body and organism if the procedure is not well done. Furthermore most scientists agree that research cloning for medical research is not needed as a source of embryonic stem cells these can be obtained from embryos generated by in vitro fertilization.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why shouldn't humans attempt to clone living organisms including humans? Why do people think it is wrong? Nevertheless, natural cloning occurs everywhere. All plants, some insects, algae, unicellular organisms that conduct mitosis or binary fissions, and identical twins are all clones of each other. As long as genetic make-up is the same they are considered clones. Cloning would bring endless potentially important benefits to everyday life and more importantly, the future.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Cloning Controversy

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Research into the field would cost California an exorbitant amount of funds, funds that would better put to use fixing our roads, or providing welfare and healthcare for the underprivileged. According to the budget proposed by Jerry Brown for 2014-15, the state of California saw 106,793 million dollars in expenditures, the majority of which went to K-12 education (42.4%), healthcare (20.4%), higher education (11.6%), and the prison system (9%) (Brown, 2015). The remaining funds – which total up to about 15% of the expenditures – were allocated for human services and environmental projects. If funds were to be found for the purpose of endorsing research into human cloning, these areas would undoubtedly experience significant cuts. We would be sacrificing our education system, our healthcare system, or even our environment in order to satisfy our curiosity. Moreover, an influx of clones that are specially created for labor would drastically decrease the amount of jobs available to unskilled workers. This fact is highlighted by Giles Saint-Paul, who claims that, “financially motivated cloning will shift the distribution of [employment] to top-ability workers,” (Saint-Paul, 2003). These “top-ability workers” will be clones created from individuals who have desirable traits for the tasks that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Speech

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The worst part about cloning animals and humans is it results in failure most of the time. In the article “Arguments for and Against Creating Human Clones”, it states “95-98% of mammalian cloning experiments have resulted in failures in the form of miscarriages, stillbirths, and life- threatening anomalies”. Itś clearly a fail most of the time so why should taxpayers waist money for it? I believe in the fact that everyone in this world is different and unique. Cloning ourselves would lessen our value and our uniqueness. The article “Arguments for…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Never Let Me Go

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question of cloning humans sounds morally unethical, right? It doesn’t seem even today with our scientific technology or knowledge, that we could pull something that extraordinary off. In the novel by Kazuo Ishiguro “Never Let Me Go” we learn that the setting takes place in a world where there are clones of people who must donate their vital organs to non clones. Basically their life is setup to donate then “complete” which indefinitely means to die. There are three “donations” which take place, which later in the novel I learned a “donation” is an a surgery they perform to take out the clones organs. While this whole system is taking place these clones don’t even know they are clones! Seems kind of cliche? Human cloning wouldn’t be possible in today's world for a few reasons; It wouldn’t be morally acceptable, science could not pull it off, and it wouldn’t be socially acceptable to be a clone.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays