Preview

How Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
863 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?
How far do Sources 10, 11 and 12 suggest that the Amritsar Massacre created widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards British rule?

Sources 10, 11 and 12 suggest that the Amritsar Massacre, the incident in which British troops under the order of General Dyer fired at a crowd of Indian protesters on the 13th April 1919, did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards the British. Creating the British government to be portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.

The view of which the Amritsar Massacre did create widespread and long-lasting hostility amongst Indians towards British rule is presented in Source 11. ‘The Empire have become dishonest and unscrupulous, with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people.’ This article was written by Gandhi in 1920, which is shortly after the Amritsar Massacre, and the reliability of it is not that high as it is published in his own newspaper. Although it is still useful as Gandhi was a highly influential figure and supported by the masses so what he said would be key. Using strong words such as dishonest and unscrupulous, suggests strong feelings of hostility towards British rule. Also Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people, meaning that the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread as it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by the masses within India. This source does suggest that the Amritsar Massacre did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards British rule.

This theme of hostility towards British is also shown within Source 10, ‘Irresponsible government... rights of human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, India, a great tragedy occurred that day. The massacre that killed at least 379 people and the wounding of at least 1,200 others was committed by the British general Reginald Dyer (Cavendish). Many protests and riots preceded the massacre and resulting from them were the arrests of two leaders by the British ("Amritsar Massacre"). This caused many Indians to form mobs, which looted businesses and killed five British people (Cavendish). General Dyer was sent to Amritsar to restore order in there ("Amritsar Massacre"). What happened after he got there is why you, the Jury, are all in court today to decide General Dyer’s fate.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand the sources suggest the Amritsar Massacre did create hostility among Indians towards the British, with the British government being portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British India Dbq

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the British government intentionally created conflict between the two religious groups that made up India, causing Hindus and Muslims both to be concerned about their governmental role in the new India. In the Gandhi movie, we learn that from this tension, at least one million people died in conflict, including Gandhi himself. One million people dying in a fight that was caused by the British is anything but peaceful. Overall, these two political effects of British rule on India were negative, not positive. Indians were not represented in government, leading in civil rights oppressions (such as the right to free speech), and because the British were able to manipulate two large religions, they caused one million to die in the transition of…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, the expression of all of the Indian’s resistance was seen as rebellious and deemed as imprudent choices. Now after full consideration, one can see that that was their only way out, and how anything other than rebellious acts would have just lead to greater and greater events of violence inflicted upon them. Therefore, the conclusions behind Indian’s reasoning’s have changed over time to the point where now it is understandable why they reacted and tried to put a stop to the abuse before it got…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre or “Jallianwala Bagh massacre’’, as it took place in on the 13th of April 1919 in Jallianwala Bagh garden in Amritsar, a city located in the north of India. General Reginald Edward Dyer had announced before 13 April that ‘’ any processions or gatherings of four men will be looked upon and treated as an unlawful assembly and dispersed by force of arms if necessary’’ (Cavendish, R., 2009). In the enclosed compound were about 5000 to 20 000 Indians according to different sources(Bose, P., & Lyons, L.,1999) They were in fact protesting peacefully against the “Rowlatt act” concerning the right of appeal for the people involved in seditious activities. Dyer placed the military vehicles in front of the only door of the garden and ordered the shooting of all the unarmed civilians. The shooting lasted until the British armed men ran out of ammunition. In fact, the military used approximately 1650 rounds of ammunition, killing 379 civilians and wounding 1136 others (Bose, P., & Lyons, L., 1999). The Amritsar Massacre is considered as a major turning point that led the British government to consider the possible independence of the Indian State as the massacre became source of controversies between the British officials and the Indian nationalists. All sources state clearly that the British government condemned the massacre and qualified it as ‘’unbritish’’. Churchill declared that the massacre was 'an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation'. Dyer, standing before the commission charged of investigating the massacre, declared that he acted according to the rule of law, by engaging more precisely the ‘’minimum force’’ policy of public-order (Doyle, 2011). Subsequently, he also justified his action by the fact that the Indian nationals were defying the British authorities, and his action…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    struggles with racism in a Britain occupied India where all Indians were treated like second class…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May 1857 there was a rebellion in India that lasted for months. Indian soldiers shot their British officers. They had refused, for religious reasons, to bite or even handle the cartridges before loading them in to the, then new, Enfield Rifle, as they were said to be smeared in pig-animals that are considered unclean to Muslims- and cow –animals sacred to Hindus-grease. The Indians had become tired of the East India Company ruling and wanted power in India once more. However it wasn’t just this single event that caused the rebellion in 1857 but underlying social, political, economic and religious reasons.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the colonial period, it served the interests of the British (and their European cohorts) to exaggerate the democratic character of their own societies while diminishing any socially redeeming features of society in India (and other colonized nations). Social divisions and inequities were a convenient tool in the arsenal of the colonizers. On the one hand, tremendous tactical gains could be achieved by playing off one community against the other. On the other hand, there were also enormous psychological benefits in creating the impression that India was a land rife with uniquely abhorrent social practices that only an enlightened foreigner could attempt to reform. India 's social ills were discussed with a contemptuous cynicism and often with a willful intent to instill a sense of deep shame and inferiority.…

    • 6104 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aftermath of world war one increased the self esteem if Indian as they were fighting alongside British soldiers, it also strengthened the arguments of the Indian politicians that India should be given a greater say in Indian affairs, this suggests that Indian nationalism was starting to progress. Muslims and Hindus had also joined together, forming the Lucknow pact, which shows that the Indians were becoming more powerful as they were joining together but the day of the massacre in Amritsar only included mostly Sikh people who were gathered to celebrate their religious festival showing that the attacks weren’t necessary. local officials also went on strike as a result of the aftermath of the war, suggesting that support for the raj was crumbling, showing that maybe the action of the British at Amritsar were due to the fear of Indian nationalism and the falling support for the raj. However source 10 clearly says that “it is not proven that any conspiracy had been formed” and that Dyer had acted “beyond the necessity of the case” showing that his action was not necessary and fair as there was no proof and evidence at the scene at jailaiwad bagh to justify that the actions of the British.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snakes and Ladders

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the Indian nationalists were revolting against the British Empire, it changed the way of life in India. It let women have a more active role in everyday activities. Mehta 's father played a very active role in the revolutions; he used his house as a place for Indian nationalists to hide out for this he was placed in jail for several years. Her uncle was sentenced to seventeen years in a torture camp for different charges. Yet when asked what their worst memory of being under British rule was, they simply provided a simple story with not much significance. Now instead of being under British rule, the India people are under the rule of leaders that view themselves as being the person who drove the British out of India. One thing remains the same though, the people of India view their land as being their own, and that is what is important to them.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Indian history of freedom struggle for independence many great warriors laid down their life. There is a record of every incident. One of the most tragic incident in the history is the Jallianwala Bagh massacre which took place in Amritsar (Punjab). Winston Churchill stated this account as "'The incident in Jallian walaBagh was an extra ordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in a singular and silver stone isolation......" The most heartbreaking incident of the Indian history took place a few months after the end of the First World War. Great atrocities were committed in Punjab during the reign of Sir Michael O'Dwyer, lieutenant who was a Governor of Punjab. Sir Michael had no faith in political reforms and consequently, had no sympathy for the political agitators. He refused Tilak and B.C.Pal to enter the Punjab. The methods adopted by him to raise war loans and to find recruits were very unauthorized and oppressive. When the agitation against the Rowlatt Act started, on 7th April 1919 Sir Michael gave a stern warning to the people of Punjab. Amritsar observed hartal peacefully on 30th March and 6th April. On 10th April 1919 the government passed orders for the deportation of Dr. Satya Pal and Saifuddin Kitchlew and their internment at Dharamsala under the defense of India act. Many people went on demonstration to demand the release of two popular leaders of the Indian Independence Movement. The crowd was fired on by a military picket. The firing set off a chain of violence. As the started sinking in the dark hours of night some protesters set the city on burning fire. Several banks and other government buildings, including the Town Hall and the railway station were attacked. The violence made the British to squeeze indoors as it culminated in the deaths of at least 5 Europeans, including government employees and civilians. On 12th April 1919 General Dyer proclaimed that whoever took charge of the meetings or…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

     Political associations came into being in the 1870s and 1880s:Most of these were led by English –educated professionals such as…

    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the red coats arrived in the 19th century, India was a disintegrated spread of primitive sovereignties. Once the British began their cultural imperialistic acts, the populace felt robbed of their rights and authority to their own lives. Their birthrights and beliefs shined through a crusade of domestic rebellion guided by Mahatma Gandhi – “The father of independent India”. The Indians promoted the ideals of “swadeshi,” or self-sufficiency, and boycotted British’s commodities and services. Through persistence and resistance, Gandhi and the Indian people triumphed. After 25 years of constraint, Britain granted India full independence in 1947.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nehru Era

    • 1639 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nationalist movement: Beginning of 20th Century, growing feeling among educated Indians that British rule in India should end…

    • 1639 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays