Preview

How Did William Win Hastings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did William Win Hastings
Why did William win the battle of Hastings? There are 4 reasons for William's victory in the battle of Hastings. First, there was his preparation, the next, William's leadership. Then, Harold's weaknesses: and finally, luck. I think that luck was the main reason for William's victory because, without the wind changing at the precise moment when Harold was still at Stamford Bridge, William would not have been able to accomplish an amphibious landing unnoticed to invade the southern side of England before Harold arrived, ultimately crowning William king of England. William had spent nine months preparing for battle, training troops, building ships and waiting for the right moment to strike. They even had time to relax and eat before the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harold Godwinson was the richest man in England and had been Earl of Wessex for many years. He had been the advisor for Edward the Confessor as well as Edward’s brother-in-law because his sister married Edward in 1045. Harold was one of the most powerful nobles in England, which proves he was an experienced warrior; the Godwin family had also established alliances with all of the major noblemen in England. He understood how England should’ve been governed therefore proving himself to be a good leader. Additionally, Harold was the Witan’s choice to become king.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams victory in 1066 is suprising in some ways, this is because King Harold came up with some good choices. Harold was smart enough to think of making a shield wall with his army. By making a shield wall, William's army would have been struggling to fight them. The shield wall was formed by every man in the army to stand shoulder to shoulder to make it more stronger. Each shield was made from wood and covered in metal which would help the shield wall more protective and stronger. Another good choice from King Harold was positioning his army at the top of Senlac Hill. This was a good choice because William's army were firing arrows at them. This would result in the arrows being fired and missing Harold's army completely.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William did not know it yet, but by allowing this to happen he had already lost the battle before it began. All William had to do was put more guards…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason Richard lost the Battle of Bosworth was because of the Stanley’s changing sides. The Stanley’s controlled around 6000 of Richards troops, around half of his overall army. Although the Stanley’s began the battle on the side of Richard, they changed during the battle. This meant that Richard has far fewer troops than he may have anticipated, and had the Stanley’s not changed sides, it is possible that Richard would have won. Many of Richards other nobles were also unreliable, such as Northumberland. He did not help Richard when he needed it, refusing to bring in Richards reserves, and eventually surrendering, giving Henry an advantage over Richard, helping him to win.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Richard lost at the battle of Bosworth can be put into long and short-term factors. In the short term, to start with Richard outnumbered Tudor’s men 10000 to 5000 and were obviously favoured to be victorious, however when Richard tried to kidnap Tudor, this forced Tudor to seek help from the French. This allowed for King Charles to use henry as a means of unsettling the English Monarchy, to do this Charles gave Henry 60000 francs and 1800 highly professional mercenaries to use in the battle. Although Richards’s men outnumbered Tudor’s, Tudor’s men were of higher skill level and this was certainly a factor of defeat.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Construction of defenses began immediately. After conferring with engineers, Cornwallis estimated six weeks for completion. However, upon the first day of the siege, October 9, the fortifications were not complete. Furthermore, several officers who had previously visited Yorktown stated in a war council that, “his Lordship might defend that position twenty-one days, open trenches, against 20,000 men and a proportional artillery.” This may have been the case if Cornwallis commanded with the same ferocity he possessed in his previous battles. Therefore, these assessments presented Clinton with a false timeline hastening the departure of reinforcements that ultimately did not arrive in time to save Cornwallis from surrender.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. William increased the royal power in England by Granting fiefs to the church and barons, keeping large amounts of land for himself, monitoring who and where castles were built, and requiring every vassal to swear first allegiance to him.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the Tapestry, this is depicted within the one-sidedness of the aforementioned battle preparations. This is seen from both the ability of the Normans to construct the boats needed to cross the Channel, the quick building of the motte-and-bailey castles for defence, and even in the number of forces that William was able to procure for the invasion. Although much of this can be attested to the perspective of the embroidery being from a pro-Norman viewpoint, it still nonetheless attests to an organized battle on the side of William pitted against a rushed Anglo-Saxon conglomeration. In actuality, this perhaps reflects the fact that the Anglo-Saxons, under King Harold, had recently faced two other invasions to the north. This is of no mention within the Tapestry, an omission that gives the Normans the appearance of defeating fierce army, but still allows for the depiction that Herlands force that was the lesser military…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will try to explain the reason for Britains victory in the battle of Britain. I will look at tactics, pilots, leadership, technology and weapons to help me explain this.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays