Preview

How Did Dred Scott Influence The Civil Rights Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Dred Scott Influence The Civil Rights Movement
Born into slavery in 1795 Dred Scott just seemed like every other black slave in the South, but down the road he would be one of the biggest influences in the civil rights movement and the progression of slavery. Dred Scott tried to earn his freedom in a very unusual ways for the black slaves back then, he fought like the white men would; in court. This case would later influence the South succeeding into the confederacy, and most certainly making a big point into slavery coming to an end.

Dred Scott earned his freedom after his first slave owner Peter Blow had passed away. After his first owner died, Scott spent time in two free states working for several subsequent owners. Shortly after he married Harriet Robinson, he tried to buy freedom for himself and his wife him and their four children but failed, where finally in Missouri he took legal action. He argued that although he served other families than the Blow’s he had served them in free states therefore making him a free man, which became the basis for his legal battles. The series of court rulings began in 1846. Dred Scott lost in his first law suit in a local St. Louis district court, which he then later appealed and won the second trial. But the final decision of the second trail was decided to be over turned to the Missouri Supreme court. The
…show more content…
Finally in the end Peter Blows sons, who had grown up with Dred Scott payed all of his legal fees and eventually purchased Dred Scott and his wife Harriet Robinson and emancaped him, giving him the freedom he so desperately wanted and deserved. Sadly, Dred Scott’s freedom was much to short lived after passing away from tuberculosis nine months later on September 17, 1858 in St. Louis Missouri. His wife Harriet survived another 18 years Dred Scott was originally buried in Calvary Cemetery in St.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scott lived in many place throughout his life and had many masters. He lived in Virginia, Alabama, Missouri, Illinois, and Wisconsin territory. Two out of his four children died at infancy (two sons) both of his daughters lived up to adult hood (Eliza Scott and Lizzie Scott). Harriet…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Lyndon B. Johnson was a key figure in a crucial time in American politics and civil rights movement. He was a liberal who had grown up poor in the state of Texas and this translated well with the American people. Furthermore, Johnson early childhood was a prelude to be his greatest ideals that defined his administration and dreams of the Great Society (Germany, 2009). President Johnson was in the forefront of social justice but did not see justice as just a race issue; he saw it as a class issue that he fought to repair. President Johnson wish was to save children by ensuring the education system was strong a trait that was said to come from his mother who valued intelligence and education (Kearns, 1976).…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott, originally a slave in Missouri, had been taken by his owner, John Emerson, into Illinois, where slavery had been prohibited by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, and into the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise. After his return to Missouri, Scott brought suit against Emerson 's widow, claiming that he was free by reason of his residence in free territory. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled against him, but after his ownership was transferred to Mrs. Emerson 's brother, John F. A. Sanford of New York, Scott brought a similar suit in federal court. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that a black slave could not become a citizen under the U.S. Constitution based on that Scott had not become free by virtue of his residence in a territory covered by the Missouri Compromise, since that legislation was unconstitutional. This was viewed as a proslavery decision by the abolitionists, and the case probably hastened the coming of the Civil War. That issue aside, it was the second time that the Court had declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, the first having occurred 54 years earlier, in Marbury vs. Madison.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr., born on January 15, 1929, in Atlanta, Georgia, is celebrated as a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement. At a young age, King exhibited extraordinary intelligence and a deep commitment to social justice, foreshadowing the influential role he would later play in reshaping the course of American history. Growing up in a segregated society, King witnessed the harsh realities of racial discrimination and inequality. These experiences fueled his determination to bring about positive change. King's journey as a civil rights leader began with his involvement in the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955, a pivotal event triggered by the arrest of Rosa Parks, an African American woman who refused to give up her seat…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. was one of the most inspiring people of all time. He was an activist, who was fighting against racial discrimination and for the blacks’ rights in the 1950s. Martin Luther King, Jr. was the son of Martin Luther King, Sr., who was a great activist and leader in the early stages of the civil rights movement. He also had a huge impact on his son. Martin Jr. witnessed a lot of racial discrimination against blacks during his early life. Living in a society where he and other African-Americans had fewer rights than all other people, along with other influential motivations, pushed him into living his life trying to retrieve the African-Americans’ rights and trying to help create a society, where all people are treated equally.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision was an important ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that had a significance influence on the issue of slavery. The case was decided in 1857 and that slaves were viewed as property, and had no individual rights. This controversy began when Scott traveled with his owner to Illinois, a free state and lived there for seven years, in the end returning to Missouri, a slave state. When his owner passed away, Scott filed a lawsuit arguing that he should be considered a free man. The owner’s wife disagreed with Scott. After series of court decisions, Scott decided to bring his case to the federal courts. Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that Scott could not bring his case to the courts because he was still a slave. When the Constitution was written, the courts allegedly considered blacks as subordinate and inferior to the dominant race. The Dred Scott decision also declared the Missouri compromise to be an unconstitutional use of congressional power because it deprived slaveholder of the property without due process of law. Therefore, they could not be citizens. Following the Civil War, the Reconstruction Congress passed, and states ratified the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendment, were added to the Constitution which directly overturned the Dred Scott decision. The 13th amendment ratified in 1865 made slavery unconstitutional everywhere within the United States. The 15th amendment ratified in 1870 made it unconstitutional for the national government or state governments to deny an individual the right to vote based in race, color, or previous history of having been a slave or of having been descended from a slave. The 14th amendment ratified in 1868 established that anyone born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen of the United States and also the state in which he or she lives. This proclamation made it clear that former slaves were fully citizens. It then declared that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    was mother of Walter, Anne, and Charles Scott. He was the sheriff of the county of…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays