Preview

Hierarchy Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hierarchy Court
CHAPTER 1 THE COURT STRUCTURE
- The present court structure has been in effect since June 1994 following the Constitution (Amendment) Act 1994.
- The judicial powers are exercised by the Subordinate Courts and the superior courts organised in a hierarchy where the Subordinate Courts are at the lower level and the superior courts at the higher level.
THE SUBORDINATE COURTS (The Subordinate Courts Act 1948)
THE PENGHULU’S COURT
- The Penghulu’s Court is presided over by a Penghulu who has limited jurisdiction within a mukim.
- In criminal cases, the Penghulu can impose a fine not exceeding RM25.
- In civil cases, the Penghulu can try dispute where value of the subject matter does not exceed RM50.
- An appeal against a Penghulu’s decision lies in a First Class Magistrate.
THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT (Two classes)
1. Second Class Magistrates’ Court
- The Magistrate is not required to be qualified in law, and is usually a public servant or minor court officer who performs the functions of granting bail and mentioning cases.
- In criminal cases, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try cases where the maximum punishment is not more than 12 months’ imprisonment; and can impose a fine not exceeding RM1000 or an imprisonment of up to 6 months or a combination of a fine and imprisonment.
- In civil cases, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try cases to recover a debt of RM3000 or less.
2. Second Class Magistrates’ Court
- The Magistrate has to be a member of the Judicial and Legal Service.
- In criminal cases, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try all offences punishable with a fine or imprisonment of up to 10 years plus offences under Sections 392 and 457 of the Penal Code; and can impose a fine up to RM10000, an imprisonment of up to 10 years, whipping of up to 12 strokes, or a combination of these sentences.
- In civil cases, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try cases where value of the subject matter does not exceed RM25000.
-

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Defendants election: if magistrates accept jurisdiction, defendant has the right to choose trial by jury. He should also be informed that if he chooses to be tried at magistrates, they can still send his case to down for sentencing.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The local court has no jury. Instead a magistrate hears the case and decides the verdict and sets any punishments…

    • 3694 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the magistrates court there is a clerk which is fully trained, there role is to advise the magistrate about the law and procedures and if the sentence the magistrate has given is not satisfactory then the…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | Incorrect. Substantive due process focuses on the content (substance) of a law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Depending on which rights a law regulates, it must either promote a compelling or overriding government interest or be rationally related to a legitimate governmental end.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If the defendant pleads not guilty or refuses to state a plea, the magistrate’s have…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The state court system and the federal court system have similar codes of conduct, but they do have their differences. The state court system hears way more cases than the federal courts, and get more personally involved due to the issues being right in their own backyard. The state of California has 58 superior courts (trial courts) which reside in each of the 58 counties. It is here where any, and all, issues pertaining to civil and criminal cases, as well as family, probate, and juvenile cases are heard. This is where the bulk of California’s judiciary justice is served. If a case is appealed it is taken up the ladder to one of California’s six Courts of Appeal. According to courtinfo.ca.gov (2011), “The State legislature divided the state geographically into six appellate districts, each containing a Court of Appeal.” (About California Courts, para. 2). The Supreme Court of California sits at the apex of authority in the state 's judicial system (courtinfo.ca.gov, 2011). Cases that have been questioned in the Court of Appeal must be reviewed by the Supreme Court, as well as any case in which a trial court has issued the death penalty.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Lay- person in the context of a lay magistrate is a person with no legal qualifications or training in law. Their purpose is to provide experience of society and ensure that the common people’s values are represented when delivering a verdict. Most magistrates are lay magistrates and they are also referred to as justices of the peace. There are roughly 30,000 lay magistrates sitting on the bench and they usually sit in threes but section 49 of the crime and disorder act 1998 allows single magistrates to exercise certain powers when administering justice. All magistrates are appointed by the Lord Chancellor on the advice of the local advisory committees for each area. To become a Lay magistrate a person must be between the ages of 18 to 65 but this requirement has only recently come into place, with the requirement being dropped from 21 to 18 in 2003. A lay magistrate must have six key qualities to enable them to be appointed, these ensure that the magistrate is of sound mind and judgement. Most magistrates are nominated by groups such as trade unions but a person can nominate themselves to partake in the role. The maximum sentence a lay magistrate can give if up to 6 months imprisonment and a £5000 fine. Therefore there power is restricted enabling them to only deal with certain cases. It is said that magistrates are involved in 97% of cases whether this is in the pulmonary stages or the final sentencing; therefore it is clear to see that they play a vital role within the legal system.…

    • 3775 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Judicial Branch holds an enormous deal of power and possesses an extremely influential grip on governmental processes that occur in both national and state levels, the system of checks and balances assures that it is not a monarchial power while also allowing it some level of power. Judicial review, the belief that the Judicial Branch possesses the ability to control and veto decisions made by the Executive and Legislative branches, is one such power that the Judiciary contains in the system of checks and balances. This specific ability allows the Judiciary to hold a certain amount of restrained power that can control the other two branches.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A court is a place where justice is administered. It is a tribunal duly constituted for the hearing and determination of cases, and a session of a judicial assembly. The courts are here to settle disputes between parties. The purpose for the courts is to hear the defendant's cases and either rule to dismiss or sentence the defendant to some type of punishment. The defendant is given a chance to plead guilty, not guilty, or no contest. If the defendant pleads guilty during their arraignment the judge may sentence them at that time or schedule them for sentencing. If they plead not guilty than their case is scheduled for a trial, depending on what charges are filed by the Prosecuting Attorney or District Attorney. During a trial officers, medical specialist, forensic experts, and witnesses may be subpoenaed. At this time the judge will hear both sides of the opposing counsel. The judge and jury are the fact finders. The jury will deliberate and come back to court with a decision. At this time the judge will read their decision and is the one who determines the law. At the sentencing the judge will make the final decision. If a defendant pleas no contest than they leave it up to the judge to choose what punishment or sentencing is given for that person. No matter what that defendant pleas during the arraignment they do give the option to come clean or fight their case in a trial.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The nature of the offence – some courts or divisions within courts will have authority to hear particular types of offences.…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the US court system the local courts are under the state courts. They include the county, municipal, traffic and magistrate courts. These courts mostly hear the minor cases and…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    District Court judges are often assisted by Magistrate Judges. Magistrates are not judges that have their place secured. But, they are auxiliary officers (appointed under Article I of the Constitution) who handle certain kinds of tasks sent by District Judges. Magistrates can take pleas of "not guilty" in felony criminal charges; they also frequently handle discovery disputes, misdemeanor trials, settlement negotiations, and hearings to calculate damages. Their orders can be appealed to the District Judge who initially had the…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States legal system ladder, begins with the federal courts and numerous levels of courts. The hierarchy of courts is known to be the most complex system in the entire world. Many individuals use these systems of the courts to resolve disputes. It’s a system that functions successfully in a country as big and varied as the United States. The Supreme court is the highest court in the land it has the ultimate authority to appeal over all federal and state cases.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Australian Court Hierarchy

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The term "Court Hierarchy" is a very important word in the law world in modern society. It's definition gives a very clear and concise meaning to the law industry. The phrase can be split into two words to be easily dealt and understood. The word "court" is from a Greek derivative "cohors" or "cohort" meaning courtyard or retinue. It's definition from the dictionary certainly portrays the law as a very important and distinguished practice. "a. A person or body of persons whose task is to hear and submit a decision on cases at law." "b. The building, hall, or room in which such cases are heard and determined." The word, "hierarchy", however, has a more powerful and specific relation to the law world. It is a Greek derived word and originally came from the word "hierarkhia", meaning the rule of a high priest. "a. A body of clergy organized into successive ranks or grades with each level subordinate to the one above." "b. A series in which each element is graded or ranked." By placing these two words together, it has a responsibility of giving the public a definition of one of the most important practices portrayed by the Court System of Australia. Court Hierarchy is the term given to the system in which the Courts of Australia are split into different levels to deal with different matters by different levels of severity.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fd13 Essays

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Resident Magistrate Court is found in every parish, this court hears and tries both civil and criminal matters. This court consits of a clerk and a director public prosecution whom is Paula Llewyin, the court deals with the criminal cases while the civil cases has their own reprehensive attorney. They do not appeal for certain criminal cases such as murder or treason. They can conduct a preliminary enquire to see if the cases can go for trial or not. In criminal cases, the maximum fine is one million dollars per offence and the maximum imprisonment is of five years in prison, for the civil cases the maximum claim is $250,000 dollars and appeals can be made to the court of appeal. The types of courts that can be found in the Resident Magistrate Court are: Tax Court, Night Court, Gun Court,…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays