In this book, Hannah Arendt goes over the principles of the politics of communist and autocrat governments. She believes that these types of governments use tools such as implantation, or brainwashing, to get the people to believe a certain sets of ideas. These governments would get the people to believe that one race was better than the others by using those brainwashing methods. This is how Arendt thought these totalitarian governments got all of their power, and once they had that power, anything done wrong against a certain race of people would be accepted, and in some cases advocated. Such was the case in Nazi Germany in its prosecution against the Jews.
I believe that the thought of one race being superior to another is extremely backwards and crazy, no matter what race we are talking about. Everybody is different in one way or another, and to persecute somebody because they do not look the same as you do or have the same culture as you do is absurd and ignorant.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability could be wrong, so is the belief that a particular race is superior to others. Anyone can have a belief like that - black, white, whatever. I am not about to buy into this rhetoric that any race shoulders 100% of the blame for racism in America today. Indeed, but racism is a belief, not an action. Sociologists clearly delineate between "prejudices" and acts of "discrimination." One can be racist (prejudice) and not act on it (discriminate). By the same token, one can discriminate against others and not hold racist beliefs (prejudice). There is simply no way, short of telepathy, to determine if anyone is truly racist. One can easily assume that Adolf Hitler was a racist based on his writings and horrific actions, but there is absolutely no way to know for sure that Hitler *truly* hated Jews or simply used the hatred of Jews as a convenient means to attain power. Anyway, those in a position of power have more opportunities to act discriminatorily than those without, but I see no evidence to suggest that The Powers That Be are more *likely* to engage in such behaviors. As such, a discriminatory action by a "powerless" person can be more effective than the lack of such an action by someone in power.…
- 2324 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
I do not think that I am one to be bias or racist in any way. However, I do think that in the society we live in today, growing up, you know who stands out in your community. I grew up in a white community. There is very little diversity where I come from. Once I got to Jr. High though, there was one student out of the whole class that was of a different color. I do not know what it was life for her growing up where she did, but when she was little I cannot imagine that it was easy. I would not say out loud that I had more privilege than another person, but when I was younger, I feel like I may have thought that I…
- 889 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Discrimination in any case is a disrespectful and despicable. It doesn’t matter or is about color, religion social class, or birth country. In my opinion judging others, a person only because these characteristics only could came from an ignorant person. Wasn’t discrimination the reason which unleashed a World War? Additionally, wasn’t not discrimination the main reason of the Ku Klux Klan to execute another human being? It’s time to reflect and change these judgmental attitude. So, I agree with Shakan, found his essay and observation about this issue by Americans, very well…
- 447 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Seeing someone as a lesser person based on their skin color is indeed discrimination. In the Lemon Grove Incident, Americans violated the Fourteenth Amendment of Mexican students. The Fourteenth Amendment has a clause, which is the equal protection clause. The equal protection clause States that “No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”(Amendment XIV section 1). In other words the Fourteenth Amendment forces states to treat anyone with the same laws as others in a similar situation. The Lemon Grove incident was caused by the Lemon Grove school board. The Lemon Grove school board built another school (La Caballeriza) for Mexicans with the reasoning that Mexican students didn’t know enough English. The Lemon Grove Incident was an event that did not show meritocracy. Mexican children tried very hard to learn English, but American parents didn’t want their children hanging out with children who had a darker shade of skin. Even though in courts Mexican children were classified as white. During the case the judge said “To separate all the Mexicans in one group can only be done by infringing the laws of the state of California”(E. Michael Madrid 18). It seems as the harder Mexicans tried to succeed, the more white Americans started to see Mexicans as inferior and a threat.…
- 220 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
She comments on the “principle of action,” as the twin criteria of organization. She also comments on the difference between “lawful” and “lawless.” “Arendt argues that Western political thought has customarily distinguished between ‘lawful’ and ‘lawless’, or ‘constitutional’ and ‘tyrannical’ forms of government” (Dietz) Arendt reveals that terror is at the core of a totalitarian government and that terror is based on ideology. Arendt uses two types of governments to prove a point; fascist Germany and communist Russia. These governments are very controlling and difficult to live in, like totalitarian governments. She clears up the fact that totalitarian governments are not run by tyranny. She explains that even though it seems as if tyranny could be the only way a government would be run like that, that it wasn’t. Having first hand experiences with a type of totalitarian government makes her arguments very…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Margaret Canovan argued that Hannah Arendt failed to realize that political opinions too have drawbacks. According to Arendt, different people have different opinions and claims that one political opinion can bring an enhancement on another. Based on this assumption, she adopted Kant’s notion of “judgement,” that is, “to think for the sake of general” into her political thinking. But Habermas rejected her ideas on the ground that it is “monologic.” She seems to have left no room for “rational truth” in political affairs. On the other hand, Canovan also disputed on Habermas’s insistence for fixing his attention on rational consensus. Habermas assumes that “just” society can be institutionalized if political discourse is based on ideal discourse. On this ground, Arendt also argued that Habermas’ idea of placing politics on rational consensus might lead him into a dangerous illusion. Canovan’s concern on the distinctive views of rational communication between Arendt and Habermas however leave a sarcastic remark on the latter because according to her Habermas might have to wait his whole life in…
- 374 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It is inexcusable to consider others as less than who they are, simply due to the fact they are members of a separate race. We as humans must continue to comprehend we are infinitely more advantageous when we are accepting of all members of society, and when we persist in synergizing as one human race.…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
No one should be a victim of discrimination whatsoever, especially based on their skin color. A person has no control over how they look and it does not define who they are. People define themselves through what they do and how they act. Each person has potential and everyone should be given a chance to do something or be someone great. If a person is to be judged, it should be based on their behaviorism and mannerism.…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hannah Arendt wrote “Total Domination” as the Nazi regime began their apparatus of terror and destruction. As a motive of terror, Hitler removed specific races, the mentally impaired, and other attributes that weren’t suited for him and put them in concentration camps. He not only eliminated the human species but also history was lost as well. In “Total Domination” Arendt correctly explains totalitarian rule through acts of terror, losing individuality, and leaving ones humanity and self-judgment,…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Whitfield, Stephen J. "Hannah Arendt and the Banality of Evil." The History Teacher. 4th ed. Vol. 14. Society for History Education. 469-77. August, 1981. JST. Web.…
- 1317 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Next, I am white. I do believe in society it is easier to be a white woman than any other race. It is more accepted and I am more privileged. Even though I see this as really unfair, races are not treated equally or fairly.…
- 507 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When people are using racial stereotypes, they often think that they are better than the other person based on the color of their skin. In the article “Stereotypes” by Saul McLeod, he uses research on stereotypes by Katz and Braly which states, “Not surprisingly, racial stereotypes always seem to favor the race of the holder and belittle other races” (McLeod,Katz,Braly). A person who is set on pre-judging someone is that they are better than someone of another race. Some feel as though no one of another racial background can equal to them or is not even worthy to sit and eat with them, all because they do not have the same skin color. People cannot choose what race they want to be. As people belittle each others races, those that they belittle may be left thinking, together they are really better because they are black, white, Latino, or Indian.…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Our planet has been filled with cases of discrimination throughout history, whether it be because of origin, race, or religion. Many think of discrimination as a horrible thing that people should not to, but sadly most of us still discriminate. Discrimination can sometimes lead to horrible things, as seen in Germany, where death and despair reaps many who were discriminated against because they were different. Another example of discrimination is when Spain tortured many poor innocent people because they did not want to convert to their religion, which was called the Spanish Inquisition. In America black men and women, just like us, were forced to be set to a lower standard of living that white men and women, just because of the color of their skin.…
- 668 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A person should not be judged due to their appearance. Today skin color makes you a suspect in America. It makes you more likely to be stopped, more likely to be searched, and more likely to be arrested and imprisoned. When police officers stop or charge a person based on their race; that’s racial profiling. Racial profiling has been occurring around the nation for years. Statistics show that if a Caucasian man and an African American man are both driving a nice car and speeding at the same time; the police officer is most likely to stop the African-American man. Not only is racial profiling wrong, but is disrespectful to minorities, and should be illegal throughout America. Racial profiling should be illegal because it causes discomfort and humiliation to many minority citizens, lack of unity in the American people, and the possibility of real criminals getting away because he is not a minority thus becoming a threat to society.…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe it is your freedom on how you express and describe yourself. Under that believe, I do take regard of everyone as human beings. I cannot stand when one race group mistreat or persecute another group. It is essential for us to remember to treat others the way you want to be treated.…
- 393 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays