Gun Ownership Homicide In The Home

The title not only consists of the topic that is being discussed through out the paper, but it also gives the reader a clear perspective of what information will be presented to them line by line. “Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the Home” this title does not only embody what a article will be about it is an a quick look about what this paper will consist of, especially in today’s society when people are so amply for quick solutions. A title now holds power either it attracts readers or turns them off before they read the first sentence. The title consists of the research subjects in this case it would be gun owners. One of the main variables that can be seen within this article is the risk of homicide in the home specifically
This particular study not only finds the answers to this particular question but it breaks it down in a more coherent manner by analyzing many other variables that can also play a part in homicides that transpire within the home as well. This particular studies I personally believe stayed within the ethical standards that are presented in today’s standards. I believe is that the compensation that were offered to the proxies was a very intelligent way to attain participants that would be willing to tell stories. Many people would not be willing to spend their time with researchers answering numerous questions about a particular cases, if there was not an apparent compensation and or reward for their time. This case deiced to study only three particular counties then taking those and making this study even similar and only looking at cases that where pertaining to homicides that had taken place in homes. I feel that a better foundation for this particular study is to expand their sampling size by increasing the counties by either two or more, still in the same area that the prior three counties where located out. To increase the amount of homicides and to be able to offer more support for their claims that they made within the article. I feel also that the sampling size was adequate to making generalization about the the public on a small scale. But if the study did become more popular and utilized after publication then I feel that the size needs to be larger prior to making generalization about the public. The different types of methodology that was used during the time of the case study I feel like it was very valid especially the type of system that they used to collect information pertaining to the cases; using the proxies. It provide a validity to their case and the information that they were able to attain from