Preview

Intolerable Tolerance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intolerable Tolerance
Intolerable Tolerance

Intolerable tolerance, is often said that too much of a good thing is wonderful, which in this case that may not be true. Tolerance which is a virtue only when it is difficult, it involves strong beliefs as a symptom: a distinctively contemporary form of decadence. George F. Will who wrote and summarized the handout on intolerable tolerance. He writes about the thoughts of Theodore Kaczynski’s journal. Kaczynski is a bomber who killed three and maimed twenty two. He did not apologize for what he did and does not regret it. He does on the other admit to it, instead of claiming insanity or mentally disturbed. My reaction to this was a man that will admit to his sins and take responsibility for them then I would be more likely to give him life in prison than the death penalty. It says that in the American society there are about 500,000 murders that are walking around on our streets. This is not a pleasant thought. I believe or think that if a murder can kill someone cold blooded than they should be able to take responsibility for their crimes. I don’t think that they should claim insanity or that they are mentally disturbed when in fact they really aren’t. Capital punishment is a sore subject anywhere in the world especially the United States. Some states allow it and some states don’t. I personally believe in the Capital punishment, for one thing if someone killed a person that I loved or cared about then I would want them to pay. Like the old saying goes an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. So my reactions to this article were that criminals should take responsibility for their actions and if they can commit a crime then they should be able to confess or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Allen debates firstly on the utilitarian arguments and thus possible benefits of the death penalty. Accordingly to Allen capital punishment is a deterrent and an understandable reaction of those who have been affected by the homicides. However, the significance of deterrence is unclear. Studies result only minimum support for deterrence as a consequence of executions, or what Allen in other words is trying to say: death penalty is to discourage or, scare if you will, the people from committing a murder (the death penalty in the U.S. today in practise, only applies for murder) (2), and does not have any effect. “Capital punishment remains a freakishly rare punishment” says Allen. This is a reaction to the following, if capital punishment has indeed barely sufficient deterrence or caution effects like what was just argued, it can just as well be an argument for its increased use instead of its decreased use. People do not feel alarmed enough for the consequences to prevent them from committing a murder. Clearly, it is difficult to understand the arguments from deterrence and finding a way to interpreted them sufficiently.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neo-conservatives like Rumsfeld (2002) have argued that ultimately, the ideology of mindless hatred that motivates Muslims to blow up innocent people on buses and trains and fly airliners into buildings full of innocent people in the name of “justice” must be repeatedly denounced by every Western government and must be relentlessly discredited through whatever methods necessary. They believe that people who take part in or support such atrocities, or contend that they are legitimate and that their perpetrators are heroic defenders of Islam do not deserve to have their “grievances” addressed by the civilized…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment is, undeniably, one of the most highly debated topics in the United States. Many Americans support capital punishment, but they are wrong to do so. Many people use the argument that capital punishment deters crime and recent studies have shown that it does deter crime. Over the years, several studies have demonstrated a link between executions and decreases in murder rates (Haugen). While this is true, people do not realize there are several reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. The three main reasons capital punishment should be abolished is too many innocent inmates are either executed or put on death on row, capital punishment is morally wrong, and it would save the government millions of dollars if capital punishment was not in place.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Positive connotations are used to describe tolerance as representing “broad-mindedness and vision” predicated on a confidence that enables “new challenges” to be met without the need for either “intransigence or violence.”…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Assignment Crt 205

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment has long been on the chopping block within many forums in America. Most in favor will argue, when considering the most heinous and wicked of crimes, criminals committing these crimes should be put to death. Those opposed will always take the stance that capital punishment is unacceptable in a civilized society in that it is a cruel form of punishment. My stance is one of support for capital punishment in the capacity that it is a necessity in respect to the basic premise of the severity of punishment being weighed against the circumstances of the crime.…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tolerant, even if he did not act upon his belief. A Tolerant person must possess…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “When someone commits a felony, it is a matter of free will. No one is compelled to commit armed robbery, murder, or rape. The average citizen does not have the mind or intentions to become a killer(Ornellas).” This statement by Lori Ornellas, a victim in the brutal murder of her nephew shows us that when someone commits a crime they do it on their own account. In the United States today more than six thousand murder investigations a year go cold or go unsolved(Rein). This means that there are so many murders that get away and are not held accountable for the crimes that they have committed. Today in our society capital punishment is a form of punishment that is implemented in our justice system. Capital punishment should stay implemented in our justice system because, the death penalty can serve as a deterrent for violent crimes, the death penalty is morally permissible in today’s society, and under our Constitution the death penalty legally permissible.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has always been a huge controversial issue in the United States. Some states have legalized this punishment while others do not agree and sentence defendants to life in prison instead. Capital punishment, or the death penalty is a legal sentence to die for criminal behavior. It varies from state to state how the execution of the convicted criminal is carried out. Just like every controversial issue there is always two viewpoints. The first is that law enforcement and juries make errors and capital punishment cannot be reversed. The second is that certain crimes are so heinous that the perpetrator deserves to die. There are many pros and cons related to the death penalty. The question has always been, do psychopaths with no regard for human life deserve to live or should they be put to death with the same coldness that they showed to their victims.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debating the Death Penalty is authored by Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell. Hugo Adam Bedau is a retired professor of philosophy at Tufts University. Bedau has more than two awards and wrote for many newspapers as well as academic presses. He was an editor of the standard work on capital punishment “The Death Penalty in America” and several other books. Bedau also published three volumes of his own essays. Paul G. Cassell was a court Judge of Salt Lake City. Cassell was a professor of Law at the University of Utah. Cassell had over nine honors and awards. He joined the faculty at the college of law in 1992 where he taught, wrote, and litigated on issues relating to crime victims’ rights and criminal justice reform. He has published many law review articles on criminal justice issues in journals. The viewpoints of experts who face questions about capital punishment is expressed clearly in Debating the Death Penalty, showing the moral and legal problems behind it all. I think the death penalty should be allowed as long as there is full evidence that the criminal on trial is quilty.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ For hundreds of years people have considered capital punishment a deterrence of crime. Seven hundred and five individuals have died since 1976, by means of capital punishment; twenty-two of these executions have already occurred this year at Death Penalty Information Center”, exclaims Tara Volpe in her article, Capital Punishment: Does Death Equal Justice? In another article written by Coretta King, the author states that, “In recent years, an increase of violence in America, both individual and political, has prompted a backlash of public opinion on capital punishment”. Capital punishment is a tremendous issue that faces the criminal justice system. Some people think that capital punishment is a good idea for those who commit capital or very serious crimes; on the other hand, some people believe that capital punishment is wrong. In reality, capital punishment is wrong for several reasons.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the murdered victim’s family perspective, we seek justice for our beloved one; we have to be the voice of our loved one since they cannot speak for themselves. I understand that capital punishment is a subject of controversial debate in the United States, and some people are against the death penalty, as they believe it to be cruel and unusual punishment. However, the Supreme Court has taken precautions and enacted a sentencing guideline to ensure that capital punishment is the right sentence; “States could establish a two-stage procedure consisting of a trial at which the question of culpability could be determined, during which evidence might be presented to make the death penalty decision better informed.” (Hendrix & Inciardi, 2013,…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I along with many people in America today still believe that the death penalty is very important in that we use it as a tool in fighting violent pre-meditated murder. One big downside to the death penalty is the possibility that innocent men and women will be put to death. Also financial cost to tax payers of capital punishment is several times that of housing the perpetrator in prison. The punishment relating to this crime is quite fair, although I believe there are many cases in that a person has committed murder but has not received the death penalty for their actions. Of the 22,000 homicides committed every year approximately 150 people are sentenced to death (Death Penalty Facts, California, Death Penalty Focus, 3/31/2009). The only real problem I still see relevant to the punishment regarding any crimes that lead to the death penalty, is that there are still innocent people being put to death and obviously once this is done there is no reversing this action. Generally speaking I would say the death penalty as a punishment is fair and that we are being too lenient in that people who should receive the death penalty are given a life sentence in prison as an…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays