Preview

Fraud Triangle paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fraud Triangle paper
Real Housewife of New Jersey Or
Criminal of Fraud

The TV series “Real Housewives of New Jersey” super star Teresa Giudice and husband Joe have been accused of more than 39 counts of Fraud. The Fraud accounts range from mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, making false statements on loan applications and bankruptcy fraud. Teresa is obviously a woman that has money and has fame and an image attached with her name. The question is why would she commit fraud with so much going for her? The Fraud Triangle has three different points the non-shareable problem, the opportunity, and the Rationalization which will be the foundation of getting into the minds of Teresa and Joe.
The Fraud Triangle can better help us understand why this act could be committed in the first place. The first point of the Triangle is a “Non-sharable Problem” which in Teresa’ case would have to be status gaining. In all the articles I have read Teresa seems to want what a lot of stars want more fame. This is similar to the old saying a man with power only wants one thing and that’s more power. Teresa falsely claimed in a $121,500 mortgage application that she worked for four years at Modern Era investment Corp. earning $3,750 a month, according to the indictment prosecutors contend she actually was unemployed from January 2001 to 2008. Also Joe her husband also failed to file tax returns for 2004 through 2008 when he had earned nearly $1 million.
The Second part of this Triangle would be the Opportunity the trust violator has. Teresa and Joe had all the abilities to commit this Fraud. At the time the crime was committed it was during the housing booming era before the economic crash. It was easier for people to get loans without proving to much of their income. Teresa and Joe obviously knew this when committing this crime and once they had committed the crime it became easier and easier to do it again and again. Their status in society made them able to conduct their crimes they had falsified

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to the 16-count indictment and a related criminal complaint, Blalock and Bush allegedly recruited women to steal personal information, such as social security numbers, addresses, and dates of birth, from their employers, which included a local dental practice, insurer, and rental car company. Over 600 potential victims have been identified. Members of the ring are alleged to have used the stolen identity information to manufacture fraudulent identification documents bearing their photographs and victims’ personal information, and would then use those fraudulent identification documents and victims’ social security numbers to open credit lines under victims’ names. Through this scheme, members of the ring were able to obtain merchandise from various retailers.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Livent's Fraud Summary

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the late 80s and 90s, a Toronto-based theater company showcased performances of popular acts like Ragtime, Showboat, and Phantom of the Opera. Livent, Inc. (Livent) founders, Garth Drabinsky and Myron Gottelieb, watched their small theater company grow from a partnership and become publicly traded on the NASDAQ a few years later. Eventually the duo sold off the “successful” theater company to Michael Ovitz, the head of Lynx Ventures, L.P. in 1998. The new owners came to discover that there was more drama happening offstage than onstage! (Jackson 2015).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fraud Schemes Exercise

    • 258 Words
    • 1 Page

    The store clerk giving the refund signs the refund form; names of purchasers are only obtained for the card refunds.…

    • 258 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martha Stewart Fraud Case

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 2003, Martha Stewart was facing prison time and her empire in domestic art was at risk because of “nine-count federal indictment” which she was charge will “perjury and conspiracy” because of a “high profile stock trading scandal” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.). James Comey, a U.S. Attorney, said that “she brought trouble on herself and her company by lying to her shareholders and investors in an attempt to cover her tracks and keep her stock from plummeting” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.). Comey believe that the criminal case was all about lying and he said that Martha is being prosecuted for what she did and not who she is. When she went to court she plead not guilty. Stewart was also charge with “securities fraud stemming” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.).,…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people that are in high profile positions would rather receive positive accolades for their…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. I’m convinced that Martha Stewart did commit the crime of insider trading, on December 27, 2001. Looking at the events leading to her decision to liquidate her shares in ImClone, it is evident that she was in possession of material information that was not available to the public yet. The fact that her Financial Advisor, Mr. Bacanovic had instructed Faneuil to call Martha Stewart and let her know of the selling frenzy that was going on with the Waksal’s, which suggests that Peter Bacanovic was in possession of insider information about ImClone company, which he shared with Martha and advised her to sell her shares before the stock plummets proves that, Stewart was aware of upcoming changes effecting ImClone stock beforehand. Another incident that suggests Martha Stewart’s quilt is the fact that when Peter Bacanovic asked Faneuil to call Martha and break the news to her, Faneuil hesitated asking Peter whether or not it was permitted to share that sort of sensitive information, with another client. Merrill Lynch’s Privacy Policy prohibits the release of client information, except upon client’s…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I enjoyed reading your post. Another classmate chose this story as well. I had not heard of it before I read her post. You had mentioned that these types of crimes “rarely only hurt one person, but that multiple people get caught in this web”, this organizational deviance/crime also hurt numerous students and teachers. Barbara Byrd-Bennett accepted money in exchange for contracts. These contracts could have been done for less money leaving the excess money to be used for things that would benefit the students as well as help teachers. One teacher commented that according to Abc7chicago.com (2015), “I’m outraged and appalled by the fact that I spent several years trying to get text books and resources for my 12th grade students to get…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    she knew her company Martha Stewart living Omni media would see a negative impact because it was associated with ImClone, so she sold some of her shares and because of that she was charged with manipulating the price of the stock of he own company. But by expressing her innocence that was charge was later thrown out (McGee, 2008). Ultimately she was guilty for everything, but the primary legal issues were from Stewarts conspiracy to defraud the investigators. The verdict, “ Martha Stewart was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice in an insider trading case in 2004, and her punishment was five-months jail sentence, five-month house arrest two-year probation, and a $30,000 fine” (Source). Many believed her sentence was too lenient.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martha Stewart is an American Home decorator Icon surrounded by accusations of Inside trading, Obstruction of justice, False statements and Conspiracy. Her trial and investigation lasted for two years ending with her being found guilty of charges and convicted to spend time in jail, home arrest and probation. In this work I will expose Martha Stewart’s behavior and why her actions were considered outlaw, unethical and unprofessional. I will also explain which ethical behavior she used and how that affects her image, financial status, social position, fame and followers.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cressey however, took his own studies in a different direction from Sutherland’s research. He was intrigued by embezzlers, whom he called “trust violators”. He was especially interested in the circumstances that led them to be overcome by temptation. Upon completion of his research, he developed what still remains as the classic model for the occupational offender. His research was published in "Other People’s Money: As Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement.”…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States takes fraud very seriously and the majority of its government organizations dedicate time and specific teams to investigate and combat fraud from occurring within the government and governmental agencies. If you work within one of these sectors, you usually can safely report a scam under the protection of a whistleblower policy. If you witness this as a normal citizen, you can feel secure with the same protection. Individuals opposing governmental corruption and reporting it to the right sources is a cornerstone of democracy.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fraud Triangle

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When evaluating this case using the three elements of the fraud triangle I have concluded that the potential pressures for Chris to commit fraud are greater than for others. The pressure is from Chris himself because he wants what others have or what he doesn’t have. This is due to the fact that Chris is young and impressionable may feel as though he doesn’t make enough money to obtain the material possession he desires or see others with. He may also be of the mindset that “he wants it now” it being the latest technology. This younger generation seems to feel entitlement instead of working and earn it. This may be due to their upbringing. Although my generation had things we worked for them and with our parents/families help we were able to obtain those things we wanted. We live in a technology savvy society so if you don’t have the last gadget then you may be looked upon as not having the means to acquire these things or not technologically savvy enough to want or have these items. Having the latest gadgets is a societal status symbol, the more you have…. the more you have meaning money. Chris may have friends that have the latest and greatest technology and he maybe envious of them and desire to acquire those things as well but not on his salary in his mind. So he must find a way to get either more money or a way to acquire the latest and the greatest in technology.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martha Stewart was a celebrity homemaker who served five months in prison for lying about a stock sale. She was convicted of lying to invesitgators about why she sold ImClone stock in December 2001, just before the stock price plunged (McCabe, 2010). After going through a five-week jury trial, Martha was found guilty in March 2004 of conspiracy, obstruction of an agency proceeding and making false statements to federal investigators. She served her sentence in West Virginia and was released March 4, 2005. After her release she was placed on house arrest for five months. Since then she has made a highly successful…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very famous scandal that has embedded ourselves in our history is the Martha Stewart scandal of 2003. Martha Stewart is a true success story of the American dream in effect. Starting as a housewife, Martha created her career by turning her previous business experience and career into a household name and an enterprise. Having established Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (MSO), which handled everything from print to television to merchandising, with her business partner Sharon Patrick in 1997 the company went public in October of 1999. She became entangled in an insider trading scandal only 4 years later.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Martha Stewart was under investigation for insider trading. She had sold 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems in December 2001, just before the Food & Drug Administration announced that it was scuttling ImClone's application to sell a new so-called wonder drug. It looked like classic insider trading, and it probably was, but oddly the feds never proved this in court, or even tried to prove it. Instead, they charged Stewart with four crimes (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements to federal agents), all stemming from her conversations with investigators. A jury found her guilty, and she was sentenced to five months in prison. Under federal law,…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays